21 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2013–2025 12 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Hearts Bluff Game Ranch, Inc. v. Stategreen2 sentences2025“In the absence of a properly pled takings claim, the state retains immunity.” Hearts Bluff Game Ranch, Inc. v. State, 381 S.W.3d 468, 476 (Tex. 2012). 2025“In the absence of a properly pled takings claim, the state retains immunity.” Hearts Bluff Game Ranch, Inc. v. State, 381 S.W.3d 468, 476 (Tex. 2012). | 10 | 15 |
City of Houston v. James & Elizabeth Carlsongreen2 sentences2021Instead, it is the plaintiff’s burden to plead facts that affirmatively state a viable claim. “‘In the absence of a properly pled takings claim, the state retains immunity’” and the court “must sustain a properly raised plea to the jurisdiction.” City of Houston v. Carlson, 451 S.W.3d 828, 830 (Tex. 2014) (quoting Hearts Bluff Game Ranch, Inc. v. State, 381 S.W.3d 468, 476 (Tex. 2012)). 2021“In the absence of a properly pled takings claim, the state retains immunity” and “a court must sustain a properly raised plea to the jurisdiction.” Id. at 830 . | 5 | 7 |
Klumb v. Houston Municipal Employees Pension Systemgreen1 sentence2025Pension Sys., 458 S.W.3d 1, 13 (Tex. 2015)). “[T]he State retains its immunity in the absence of a properly pled takings claim.” Jim Olive Photography v. Univ. of Houston Sys., 624 S.W.3d 764 , 777 (Tex. 2021). | 1 | 1 |
Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. Whitleygreen1 sentence2021“In a suit against a governmental unit, the plaintiff must affirmatively demonstrate the court’s jurisdiction by alleging a valid waiver of immunity.” Dallas Area Rapid Transit v. Whitley, 104 S.W.3d 540, 542 (Tex. 2003); cf. also Hearts Bluff Game Ranch, Inc. v. State, 381 S.W.3d 468, 476 (Tex. 2012) (“In the absence of a properly pled takings claim, the state retains immunity.”). | 1 | 1 |
Andrade v. NAACP of Austingreen1 sentence2017See Texas Parks & Wildlife Dep’t v. Sawyer Tr., 354 S.W.3d 384, 388 (Tex. 2011) (considering underlying nature of claim to determine if sovereign immunity waived as to that claim); Andrade v. v. NAACP of Austin, 345 S.W.3d 1, 11 (Tex. 2011) (considering substance of claims that included allegations of constitutional violations in reviewing plea to jurisdiction and noting that immunity was retained unless “viable claim” pleaded); see also Hearts Bluff Game Ranch, Inc. v. State, 381 S.W.3d 468, 476, 491 (Tex. 2012) (observing that state retains immunity in “absence of a properly pled takings cla | 1 | 1 |
Texas Parks & Wildlife Department v. Sawyer Trustgreen1 sentence2017See Texas Parks & Wildlife Dep’t v. Sawyer Tr., 354 S.W.3d 384, 388 (Tex. 2011) (considering underlying nature of claim to determine if sovereign immunity waived as to that claim); Andrade v. v. NAACP of Austin, 345 S.W.3d 1, 11 (Tex. 2011) (considering substance of claims that included allegations of constitutional violations in reviewing plea to jurisdiction and noting that immunity was retained unless “viable claim” pleaded); see also Hearts Bluff Game Ranch, Inc. v. State, 381 S.W.3d 468, 476, 491 (Tex. 2012) (observing that state retains immunity in “absence of a properly pled takings cla | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
City of McKinney v. Hank's Restaurant Group, L.P.
green
1 sentence2014City of McKinney, 412 S.W.3d at 112 . | 1 | 2014–2014 |