21 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2025 8 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Dahlgreen2 sentences2010See Dahl, 139 Wn.2d at 688 . 2010See Dahl, 139 Wn.2d at 688 . | 2 | 2 |
Matter of Personal Restraint of Cashawgreen2 sentences2023Brandon Creech next cites In re Personal Restraint of Cashaw, 123 Wn.2d 138, 149 (1994). 2023Brandon Creech next cites In re Personal Restraint of Cashaw, 123 Wn.2d 138, 149 (1994). | 1 | 2 |
Holder v. City of Vancouvergreen1 sentence2025Id. (good reason); Holder, 136 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
Matter of Personal Restraint of Davisgreen1 sentence2024See Davis, 67 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
Frank Haygood v. Evelle J. Younger, and Harold Cranke and Benjamin Seymourgreen2 sentences2022The DOC defendants did not cause Scott to serve additional time on community custody. 8 No. 83419-3-I/9 Scott, relying on Haygood v. Younger, 769 F.2d 1350, 1359 (9th Cir. 1985), argues that DOC is liable for failing to end her supervision despite being on notice by September 2016 that Scott believed her amended sentence was illegal. 2022The DOC defendants did not cause Scott to serve additional time on community custody. 8 No. 83419-3-I/9 Scott, relying on Haygood v. Younger, 769 F.2d 1350, 1359 (9th Cir. 1985), argues that DOC is liable for failing to end her supervision despite being on notice by September 2016 that Scott believed her amended sentence was illegal. | 1 | 1 |
State Of Washington v. Daren M. Moralesgreen1 sentence2022The DOC defendants moved to dismiss Scott’s complaint under CR 12(b)(6), arguing that (1) they had no authority to override or disregard the amended judgment and 3 See State v. Morales, 196 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
Maziar v. Department of Correctionsgreen1 sentence2015Maziar v. Dep’t of Corr., 180 Wn. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Dahlgreen2 sentences2010See Dahl, 139 Wash.2d at 688 , 990 P.2d 396 . 2010See Dahl, 139 Wash.2d at 688 , 990 P.2d 396 . | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Mottergreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Everybodytalksaboutgreen | 1 | 1 |
| In re the Detention of Brooksgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Smithred | 1 | 1 |
| In Re the Personal Restraint of Cookgreen | 1 | 1 |
| In Re Detention of Brooksgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Smithred | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
King v. Rice
green
2 sentences2018King v. Rice, 146 Wn. 2017King v. Rice, 146 Wn. | 2 | 2017–2018 |
In re the Personal Restraint of Capello
green
2 sentences2003NOTES [1] 106 Wash.App. 576 , 24 P.3d 1074 , rev. denied, 145 Wash.2d 1006 , 37 P.3d 292 (2001). [2] In re Personal Restraint of Stewart, 110 Wash. App. 1050 , 2002 WL 339352 (2002). [3] Former RCW 9.94A.120(8)(b) (1988). [4] Former RCW 9.94A.120(8)(b)(i)-(iv) (1988). [5] Former RCW 9.94A.120(8)(c)(i)-(vi) (1988). [6] Former RCW 9.94A.120(8)(c)(v) (1988). [7] Former RCW 9.94A.120(8)(b)(vi) (1992). [8] Former RCW 9.94A.150(2) (1988). [9] Capello, 106 Wash.App. at 579 , 24 P.3d 1074 . [10] 106 Wash.App. 576 , 24 P.3d 1074 . [11] North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 , 91 S.Ct. 160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 1 2003We deny DOC’s motion for reconsideration of our decision granting Stewart’s PRP and direct DOC to transfer him to community custody without the need for a preapproved residence location and living arrangement. 83 Baker and Kennedy, JJ., concur. 106 Wn. | 2 | 2003–2003 |
In Re Capello
neutral
2 sentences2003NOTES [1] 106 Wash.App. 576 , 24 P.3d 1074 , rev. denied, 145 Wash.2d 1006 , 37 P.3d 292 (2001). [2] In re Personal Restraint of Stewart, 110 Wash. App. 1050 , 2002 WL 339352 (2002). [3] Former RCW 9.94A.120(8)(b) (1988). [4] Former RCW 9.94A.120(8)(b)(i)-(iv) (1988). [5] Former RCW 9.94A.120(8)(c)(i)-(vi) (1988). [6] Former RCW 9.94A.120(8)(c)(v) (1988). [7] Former RCW 9.94A.120(8)(b)(vi) (1992). [8] Former RCW 9.94A.150(2) (1988). [9] Capello, 106 Wash.App. at 579 , 24 P.3d 1074 . [10] 106 Wash.App. 576 , 24 P.3d 1074 . [11] North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 , 91 S.Ct. 160 , 27 L.Ed.2d 1 2003App. 576 , 24 P.3d 1074 , review denied, 145 Wn.2d 1006 (2001). | 2 | 2003–2003 |
Steven P. Kozol v. Washington State Dept. of Corrections
green
1 sentence2025Id. (good reason); Holder, 136 Wn. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Gingrich v. Unigard Security Insurance
green
1 sentence2025App. 424, 428-29 , 788 P.2d 1096 (1990), for the proposition that that DOC’s attorney’s and Dr. Sawyer’s declarations in support of DOC’s motion for summary judgment cannot be relied on because of credibility issues. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Dress v. Department of Corrections
green
1 sentence2025Id. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Sanders v. State
green
1 sentence2024We “construe the facts in the light most favorable to [Cousins,] the nonmoving party.” Sanders v. State, 169 Wn.2d 827, 845 , 240 P.3d 120 (2010). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Sanders v. State
green
1 sentence2024We “construe the facts in the light most favorable to [Cousins,] the nonmoving party.” Sanders v. State, 169 Wn.2d 827, 845 , 240 P.3d 120 (2010). | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Mitchell v. Washington State Institute of Public Policy
green
1 sentence2023In Mitchell, the requestor, an inmate, was awarded costs for DOC’s violation of the PRA. 153 Wn. | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Graham v. Connor
green
2 sentences2022App. 459, 487 , 61 P.3d 1165 (2002) (quoting Graham v. Connor, ("Washington courts have consistently rejected invitations to establish a cause of action for damages based upon constitutional violations ‘without the aid of augmentative legislation[.]’") (alteration in original). 8 Although Scott expressly acknowledges that she did not bring a § 1983 claim against DOC, her arguments appear to address all of the DOC defendants. 7 No. 83419-3-I/8 490 U.S. 386, 393-94 , 109 S. Ct. 1865 , 104 L. 2022App. 459, 487 , 61 P.3d 1165 (2002) (quoting Graham v. Connor, ("Washington courts have consistently rejected invitations to establish a cause of action for damages based upon constitutional violations ‘without the aid of augmentative legislation[.]’") (alteration in original). 8 Although Scott expressly acknowledges that she did not bring a § 1983 claim against DOC, her arguments appear to address all of the DOC defendants. 7 No. 83419-3-I/8 490 U.S. 386, 393-94 , 109 S. Ct. 1865 , 104 L. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Stalter v. State
green
1 sentence2022Scott also asserts that the DOC defendants should be held liable for the tort of false imprisonment. “[A] jail is liable for false imprisonment if it holds an individual for an unreasonable time after it is under a duty to release the individual.” Stalter v. State, 151 Wn.2d 148, 155 , 86 P.3d 1159 (2004). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Stalter v. State
green
1 sentence2022Scott also asserts that the DOC defendants should be held liable for the tort of false imprisonment. “[A] jail is liable for false imprisonment if it holds an individual for an unreasonable time after it is under a duty to release the individual.” Stalter v. State, 151 Wn.2d 148, 155 , 86 P.3d 1159 (2004). | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Citoli v. City of Seattle
green
1 sentence2022App. 459, 487 , 61 P.3d 1165 (2002) (quoting Graham v. Connor, ("Washington courts have consistently rejected invitations to establish a cause of action for damages based upon constitutional violations ‘without the aid of augmentative legislation[.]’") (alteration in original). 8 Although Scott expressly acknowledges that she did not bring a § 1983 claim against DOC, her arguments appear to address all of the DOC defendants. 7 No. 83419-3-I/8 490 U.S. 386, 393-94 , 109 S. Ct. 1865 , 104 L. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Blick v. State
green
1 sentence2022“An imprisonment enacted pursuant to a valid legal process and court sentence is not false imprisonment.” Blick v. State, 182 Wn. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Petition of Fogle
procedural
1 sentence2015The Turner test is thus inapplicable. 8 The DOC asks us not to follow Salinas and cites approvingly In re Personal Restraint of Williams, 121 Wn.2d 655, 660-61 , 853 P.2d 444 (1993) and In re Personal Restraint of Fogle, 128 Wn.2d 56 , 904 P.2d 722 (1995). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
In re the Personal Restraint Petition of Fogle
green
1 sentence2015The Turner test is thus inapplicable. 8 The DOC asks us not to follow Salinas and cites approvingly In re Personal Restraint of Williams, 121 Wn.2d 655, 660-61 , 853 P.2d 444 (1993) and In re Personal Restraint of Fogle, 128 Wn.2d 56 , 904 P.2d 722 (1995). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Matter of Personal Restraint of Williams
green
2 sentences2015The Turner test is thus inapplicable. 8 The DOC asks us not to follow Salinas and cites approvingly In re Personal Restraint of Williams, 121 Wn.2d 655, 660-61 , 853 P.2d 444 (1993) and In re Personal Restraint of Fogle, 128 Wn.2d 56 , 904 P.2d 722 (1995). 2015The Turner test is thus inapplicable. 8 The DOC asks us not to follow Salinas and cites approvingly In re Personal Restraint of Williams, 121 Wn.2d 655, 660-61 , 853 P.2d 444 (1993) and In re Personal Restraint of Fogle, 128 Wn.2d 56 , 904 P.2d 722 (1995). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Francis v. Department of Corrections
green
1 sentence2015In Francis v. Department of Corrections, 178 Wn. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
State v. Hopson
green
2 sentences2013The remark made by Deputy Nishimura here—"Is this the DOC hearing you're asking about?"—is substantially similar to a remark made by a witness in State v. Hopson, 113 Wn. 2d 273 . 2013The remark made by Deputy Nishimura here—"Is this the DOC hearing you're asking about?"—is substantially similar to a remark made by a witness in State v. Hopson, 113 Wn. 2d 273 . | 1 | 2013–2013 |
State v. Motter
green
1 sentence2008Motter, 139 Wash.App. at 804, 162 P.3d 1190 (Div.Two); Autrey, 136 Wash.App. at 470-71 , 150 P.3d 580 (Div.Three); State v. Massey, 81 Wash.App. 198, 200 , 913 P.2d 424 (1996) (Div.One). [8] In addition, under WAC 137-104-060, a defendant has the right at the DOC hearing to testify or to remain silent, to call witnesses, to cross-examine witnesses, and to have an audio recording copy of the hearing. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Massey
green
2 sentences2008Motter, 139 Wash.App. at 804, 162 P.3d 1190 (Div.Two); Autrey, 136 Wash.App. at 470-71 , 150 P.3d 580 (Div.Three); State v. Massey, 81 Wash.App. 198, 200 , 913 P.2d 424 (1996) (Div.One). [8] In addition, under WAC 137-104-060, a defendant has the right at the DOC hearing to testify or to remain silent, to call witnesses, to cross-examine witnesses, and to have an audio recording copy of the hearing. 2008Motter, 139 Wash.App. at 804, 162 P.3d 1190 (Div.Two); Autrey, 136 Wash.App. at 470-71 , 150 P.3d 580 (Div.Three); State v. Massey, 81 Wash.App. 198, 200 , 913 P.2d 424 (1996) (Div.One). [8] In addition, under WAC 137-104-060, a defendant has the right at the DOC hearing to testify or to remain silent, to call witnesses, to cross-examine witnesses, and to have an audio recording copy of the hearing. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
| State v. Autrey neutral | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Autrey
green
1 sentence2008Motter, 139 Wash.App. at 804, 162 P.3d 1190 (Div.Two); Autrey, 136 Wash.App. at 470-71 , 150 P.3d 580 (Div.Three); State v. Massey, 81 Wash.App. 198, 200 , 913 P.2d 424 (1996) (Div.One). [8] In addition, under WAC 137-104-060, a defendant has the right at the DOC hearing to testify or to remain silent, to call witnesses, to cross-examine witnesses, and to have an audio recording copy of the hearing. | 1 | 2008–2008 |
| State v. Wade green | 1 | 2005–2005 |
| State v. Wade green | 1 | 2005–2005 |
| McGee Guest Home, Inc. v. Department of Social & Health Services green | 1 | 2003–2003 |
| State v. Cruz red | 1 | 2003–2003 |
| State v. Cruz red | 1 | 2003–2003 |
| North Carolina v. Alford green | 1 | 2003–2003 |
| RMC v. Coltran neutral | 1 | 2003–2003 |
| McGee Guest Home v. Department of Social and Health Services green | 1 | 2003–2003 |
| State v. Johnson neutral | 1 | 2003–2003 |
| Robin L. Miller Construction Co. v. Coltran neutral | 1 | 2003–2003 |
| Hollingsworth v. Washington Mutual Savings Bank green | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.