stare decisis scrupulously doctrine in Wisconsin

21 Wisconsin opinions name it 1 courts 2005–2024 6 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (8)

Case	Followed	Cited
Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Insurance of Wausaugreen wis · 2003 · cited in 20 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2005–2024 2 sentences 2023"This court follows the doctrine of stare decisis scrupulously because of our abiding respect for the rule of law." Hinrichs v. DOW Chemical Co., 2020 WI 2 , 389 Wis. 2d 669 , 937 N.W.2d 37 (quoting Johnson Controls, Inc., 264 Wis. 2d 60, ¶94 ). 2023"This court follows the doctrine of stare decisis scrupulously because of our abiding respect for the rule of law." Hinrichs v. DOW Chemical Co., 2020 WI 2 , 389 Wis. 2d 669 , 937 N.W.2d 37 (quoting Johnson Controls, Inc., 264 Wis. 2d 60, ¶94 ).	2	20
State v. Michael R. Luedtkegreen wis · 2015 · cited in 5 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2017–2024 2 sentences 2024We "follow[] the doctrine of stare decisis scrupulously . . . ." State v. Luedtke, 2015 WI 42, ¶40 , 362 Wis. 2d 1 , 863 N.W.2d 592 (quoting Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Emp. 2024We "follow[] the doctrine of stare decisis scrupulously . . . ." State v. Luedtke, 2015 WI 42, ¶40 , 362 Wis. 2d 1 , 863 N.W.2d 592 (quoting Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Emp.	2	5
Schultz v. Natwickgreen wis · 2002 · cited in 6 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2017–2023 2 sentences 2017See Moran, 284 Wis. 2d 24, ¶47 ("[I]f the testing [at Moran's expense] is done, the circuit court will determine whether or not the results 'support the movant's claim.' Wis. Stat. § 974.07 (9)-(10)."). ¶69 "This court follows the doctrine of stare decisis scrupulously because of our abiding respect for the rule of law." State v. Luedtke, 2015 WI 42, ¶40 , 362 Wis. 2d 1 , 863 N.W.2d 592 (quoting Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Ins. of 35 No. 2015AP202-CR Wausau, 2003 WI 108, ¶94 , 264 Wis. 2d 60 , 665 N.W.2d 257 ); Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Comm'n, 502 U.S. 197, 202 (1991) ( 2017See Moran, 284 Wis. 2d 24, ¶47 ("[I]f the testing [at Moran's expense] is done, the circuit court will determine whether or not the results 'support the movant's claim.' Wis. Stat. § 974.07 (9)-(10)."). ¶69 "This court follows the doctrine of stare decisis scrupulously because of our abiding respect for the rule of law." State v. Luedtke, 2015 WI 42, ¶40 , 362 Wis. 2d 1 , 863 N.W.2d 592 (quoting Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Ins. of 35 No. 2015AP202-CR Wausau, 2003 WI 108, ¶94 , 264 Wis. 2d 60 , 665 N.W.2d 257 ); Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Comm'n, 502 U.S. 197, 202 (1991) (	1	6
State v. Alan S. Johnsongreen wis · 2023 · cited in 3 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2023–2024 2 sentences 2024Ins. of Wausau, 2003 WI 108, ¶94 , 264 Wis. 2d 60 , 665 N.W.2d 257 ); see also State v. Johnson, 2023 WI 39, ¶19 , 407 Wis. 2d 195 , 990 N.W.2d 174 ("We have repeatedly recognized the importance of stare decisis to the rule of law."). 2024Ins. of Wausau, 2003 WI 108, ¶94 , 264 Wis. 2d 60 , 665 N.W.2d 257 ); see also State v. Johnson, 2023 WI 39, ¶19 , 407 Wis. 2d 195 , 990 N.W.2d 174 ("We have repeatedly recognized the importance of stare decisis to the rule of law.").	1	3
State v. Alexandergreen wis · 1997 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018 2 sentences 2018Such abstract is not admissible in evidence in any action for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident. § 343.24(1). 14 The holding that preponderance of the evidence is the burden of proof applies only when the prior convictions are not an element of the offense, such as in second offense OWI cases, but not so when the prior convictions become an element of the offense as in some PAC cases where the prior convictions lower the "[p]rohibited alcohol concentration." See Wis. Stat. § 340.01 (46m)(c) ; see also State v. Alexander , 214 Wis. 2d 628 , 640-41, 571 N.W.2d 662 (1997). 15 "This 2018Such abstract is not admissible in evidence in any action for damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident. § 343.24(1). 14 The holding that preponderance of the evidence is the burden of proof applies only when the prior convictions are not an element of the offense, such as in second offense OWI cases, but not so when the prior convictions become an element of the offense as in some PAC cases where the prior convictions lower the "[p]rohibited alcohol concentration." See Wis. Stat. § 340.01 (46m)(c) ; see also State v. Alexander , 214 Wis. 2d 628 , 640-41, 571 N.W.2d 662 (1997). 15 "This	1	1
Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Commissiongreen scotus · 1991 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017 2 sentences 2017"This court follows the doctrine of stare decisis scrupulously because of our abiding respect for the rule of law." State v. Luedtke, 2015 WI 42, ¶ 40 , 362 Wis. 2d 1 , 863 N.W.2d 592 (quoting Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Ins. of Wausau, 2003 WI 108, ¶ 94 , 264 Wis. 2d 60 , 665 N.W.2d 257 ); Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Comm'n, 502 U.S. 197, 202 (1991) ("Time and time again, this Court has recognized that 'the doctrine of stare decisis is of fundamental importance to the rule of law.' " (quoting Welch v. Texas Dep't of Highways and Public Transp., 483 U.S. 468, 494 (1987) (p 2017See Moran, 284 Wis. 2d 24, ¶47 ("[I]f the testing [at Moran's expense] is done, the circuit court will determine whether or not the results 'support the movant's claim.' Wis. Stat. § 974.07 (9)-(10)."). ¶69 "This court follows the doctrine of stare decisis scrupulously because of our abiding respect for the rule of law." State v. Luedtke, 2015 WI 42, ¶40 , 362 Wis. 2d 1 , 863 N.W.2d 592 (quoting Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Ins. of 35 No. 2015AP202-CR Wausau, 2003 WI 108, ¶94 , 264 Wis. 2d 60 , 665 N.W.2d 257 ); Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Comm'n, 502 U.S. 197, 202 (1991) (	1	1
Welch v. Texas Department of Highways & Public Transportationgreen scotus · 1987 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017 2 sentences 2017"This court follows the doctrine of stare decisis scrupulously because of our abiding respect for the rule of law." State v. Luedtke, 2015 WI 42, ¶ 40 , 362 Wis. 2d 1 , 863 N.W.2d 592 (quoting Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Ins. of Wausau, 2003 WI 108, ¶ 94 , 264 Wis. 2d 60 , 665 N.W.2d 257 ); Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Comm'n, 502 U.S. 197, 202 (1991) ("Time and time again, this Court has recognized that 'the doctrine of stare decisis is of fundamental importance to the rule of law.' " (quoting Welch v. Texas Dep't of Highways and Public Transp., 483 U.S. 468, 494 (1987) (p 2017See Moran, 284 Wis. 2d 24, ¶47 ("[I]f the testing [at Moran's expense] is done, the circuit court will determine whether or not the results 'support the movant's claim.' Wis. Stat. § 974.07 (9)-(10)."). ¶69 "This court follows the doctrine of stare decisis scrupulously because of our abiding respect for the rule of law." State v. Luedtke, 2015 WI 42, ¶40 , 362 Wis. 2d 1 , 863 N.W.2d 592 (quoting Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Ins. of 35 No. 2015AP202-CR Wausau, 2003 WI 108, ¶94 , 264 Wis. 2d 60 , 665 N.W.2d 257 ); Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Comm'n, 502 U.S. 197, 202 (1991) (	1	1
State v. Morangreen wis · 2005 · cited in 1 Wisconsin opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017 1 sentence 2017See Moran, 284 Wis. 2d 24, ¶47 ("[I]f the testing [at Moran's expense] is done, the circuit court will determine whether or not the results 'support the movant's claim.' Wis. Stat. § 974.07 (9)-(10)."). ¶69 "This court follows the doctrine of stare decisis scrupulously because of our abiding respect for the rule of law." State v. Luedtke, 2015 WI 42, ¶40 , 362 Wis. 2d 1 , 863 N.W.2d 592 (quoting Johnson Controls, Inc. v. Employers Ins. of 35 No. 2015AP202-CR Wausau, 2003 WI 108, ¶94 , 264 Wis. 2d 60 , 665 N.W.2d 257 ); Hilton v. South Carolina Public Railways Comm'n, 502 U.S. 197, 202 (1991) (	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (4)

Case	Cited	Years
Chris Hinrichs v. DOW Chemical Company green wis · 2020 2 sentences 2023"This court follows the doctrine of stare decisis scrupulously because of our abiding respect for the rule of law." Hinrichs v. DOW Chemical Co., 2020 WI 2 , 389 Wis. 2d 669 , 937 N.W.2d 37 (quoting Johnson Controls, Inc., 264 Wis. 2d 60, ¶94 ). 2023"This court follows the doctrine of stare decisis scrupulously because of our abiding respect for the rule of law." Hinrichs v. DOW Chemical Co., 2020 WI 2 , 389 Wis. 2d 669 , 937 N.W.2d 37 (quoting Johnson Controls, Inc., 264 Wis. 2d 60, ¶94 ).	2	2023–2023
State v. Harrell green wis · 1996 2 sentences 2020When existing law is open to revision 12"Stare decisis" refers to the principle that requires courts to "stand by things decided." State v. Harrell, 199 Wis. 2d 654, 667 , 546 N.W.2d 115 (1996) (Abrahamson, J., concurring); see Black's Law Dictionary 1626 (10th ed. 2014) (defining "stare decisis" as "[t]he doctrine of precedent, under which a court must follow earlier judicial decisions when the same points arise again in litigation"). 23 No. 2017AP2361 in every case, deciding cases becomes a mere exercise of judicial will, with arbitrary and unpredictable results." Schultz v. Natwick, 2002 WI 2020When existing law is open to revision 12"Stare decisis" refers to the principle that requires courts to "stand by things decided." State v. Harrell, 199 Wis. 2d 654, 667 , 546 N.W.2d 115 (1996) (Abrahamson, J., concurring); see Black's Law Dictionary 1626 (10th ed. 2014) (defining "stare decisis" as "[t]he doctrine of precedent, under which a court must follow earlier judicial decisions when the same points arise again in litigation"). 23 No. 2017AP2361 in every case, deciding cases becomes a mere exercise of judicial will, with arbitrary and unpredictable results." Schultz v. Natwick, 2002 WI	1	2020–2020
State v. Hansen green wis · 2001 2 sentences 2005It is a "longstanding rule that this court 'is bound by its own precedent.'" State v. Hansen, 2001 WI 53, ¶ 52 , 243 Wis. 2d 328 , 627 N.W.2d 195 (Wilcox, J., dissenting) (quoting Rose Manor Realty Co. v. City of Milwaukee, 272 Wis. 339, 346 , 75 N.W.2d 274 (1956)). ¶ 42. 2005It is a "longstanding rule that this court 'is bound by its own precedent.'" State v. Hansen, 2001 WI 53, ¶ 52 , 243 Wis. 2d 328 , 627 N.W.2d 195 (Wilcox, J., dissenting) (quoting Rose Manor Realty Co. v. City of Milwaukee, 272 Wis. 339, 346 , 75 N.W.2d 274 (1956)). ¶ 42.	1	2005–2005
Rose Manor Realty Co. v. City of Milwaukee green wis · 1956 2 sentences 2005It is a "longstanding rule that this court 'is bound by its own precedent.'" State v. Hansen, 2001 WI 53, ¶ 52 , 243 Wis. 2d 328 , 627 N.W.2d 195 (Wilcox, J., dissenting) (quoting Rose Manor Realty Co. v. City of Milwaukee, 272 Wis. 339, 346 , 75 N.W.2d 274 (1956)). ¶ 42. 2005It is a "longstanding rule that this court 'is bound by its own precedent.'" State v. Hansen, 2001 WI 53, ¶ 52 , 243 Wis. 2d 328 , 627 N.W.2d 195 (Wilcox, J., dissenting) (quoting Rose Manor Realty Co. v. City of Milwaukee, 272 Wis. 339, 346 , 75 N.W.2d 274 (1956)). ¶ 42.	1	2005–2005

Statutes the citing opinions construe

WI § Wis. Stat. § 227.19 (6) WI § Wis. Stat. § 346.63 (5) WI § Wis. Stat. § 346.65 (5) WI § Wis. Stat. § 15.37 (4) WI § Wis. Stat. § 227.01 (4) WI § Wis. Stat. § 227.11 (4) WI § Wis. Stat. § 227.135 (4) WI § Wis. Stat. § 227.185 (4) WI § Wis. Stat. § 343.305 (4) WI § Wis. Stat. § 940.25 (4) WI § Wis. Stat. § 961.20 (4) WI § Wis. Stat. § 967.055 (4)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check