Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
The doctrines Wisconsin courts name when they cite: mined from the sentence each citation lives in, keyed on the citing court, counted by distinct opinions. Entry by issue, not by case: pick one to see the cases on each side.
| # | Issue | Most-cited case | Opinions | Courts | Years | Last 5y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | due process clause | State v. Gary Lee Wayerski | 668 | 3 | 1924–2026 | 144 |
| 2 | ineffective assistance of counsel claim | Strickland v. Washington | 451 | 2 | 1982–2026 | 216 |
| 3 | erroneous exercise of discretion standard | Martindale v. Ripp | 414 | 2 | 1993–2026 | 179 |
| 4 | harmless error | State v. Harvey | 394 | 2 | 1964–2026 | 108 |
| 5 | Machner hearing | State v. MacHner | 313 | 2 | 1991–2026 | 175 |
| 6 | Miranda warning | Miranda v. Arizona | 300 | 3 | 1966–2026 | 69 |
| 7 | warrant requirement | State v. Artic | 299 | 3 | 1973–2026 | 95 |
| 8 | equal protection clause | Treiber v. Knoll | 268 | 3 | 1929–2026 | 24 |
| 9 | fundamental principle | State v. Huebner | 264 | 3 | 1849–2026 | 51 |
| 10 | exclusionary rule | United States v. Leon | 252 | 2 | 1966–2026 | 47 |
| 11 | ineffective assistance claim | Strickland v. Washington | 241 | 2 | 1988–2026 | 123 |
| 12 | affirmative defense | Maple Grove Country Club Inc. v. Maple Grove Estates Sanitary District | 233 | 3 | 1875–2026 | 48 |
| 13 | Strickland test | Strickland v. Washington | 229 | 2 | 1972–2026 | 93 |
| 14 | de novo standard | Jicha v. State Department of Industry, Labor & Human Rights Division | 211 | 2 | 1980–2026 | 34 |
| 15 | Fourth Amendment violation | Herring v. United States | 185 | 2 | 1971–2026 | 34 |
| 16 | hearsay rule | Chambers v. Mississippi | 184 | 2 | 1939–2026 | 32 |
| 17 | forfeiture rule | State v. Ndina | 184 | 3 | 1903–2026 | 109 |
| 18 | Wisconsin rule | In Matter of Bar Admission of Rippl | 180 | 3 | 1900–2026 | 14 |
| 19 | reasonable doubt error | Chapman v. California | 154 | 2 | 1977–2026 | 52 |
| 20 | reasonable possibility error | State v. Dyess | 154 | 2 | 1985–2026 | 53 |
| 21 | probable cause hearing | Dodge County v. Ryan E. M. | 145 | 3 | 1970–2026 | 36 |
| 22 | Fifth Amendment privilege | Miranda v. Arizona | 143 | 3 | 1972–2026 | 23 |
| 23 | per se rule | Missouri v. McNeely | 142 | 3 | 1974–2025 | 10 |
| 24 | double jeopardy clause | North Carolina v. Pearce | 141 | 2 | 1949–2026 | 19 |
| 25 | confrontation clause | Ohio v. Roberts | 138 | 2 | 1972–2026 | 26 |
| 26 | defendant guilty absent error | State v. Harvey | 130 | 2 | 2002–2026 | 50 |
| 27 | plain error | State v. Jorgensen | 125 | 2 | 1872–2026 | 63 |
| 28 | good faith exception | State v. Eason | 117 | 2 | 1913–2026 | 20 |
| 29 | Terry stop | Terry v. Ohio | 117 | 2 | 1983–2026 | 32 |
| 30 | prima facie presumption | State v. Bangert | 102 | 2 | 1903–2025 | 13 |
| 31 | deficiency prejudiced defense | Strickland v. Washington | 100 | 2 | 1990–2026 | 48 |
| 32 | rational basis test | Aicher Ex Rel. LaBarge v. Wisconsin Patients Compensation Fund | 98 | 3 | 1979–2026 | 9 |
| 33 | Bangert violation | State v. Bangert | 95 | 2 | 1986–2026 | 29 |
| 34 | economic loss doctrine | Daanen & Janssen, Inc. v. Cedarapids, Inc. | 95 | 2 | 1991–2026 | 17 |
| 35 | public policy exception | Brockmeyer v. Dun & Bradstreet | 92 | 2 | 1922–2026 | 11 |
| 36 | totality of the circumstances test | Illinois v. Gates | 92 | 2 | 1973–2026 | 29 |
| 37 | Sullivan analysis | State v. Sullivan | 92 | 2 | 1998–2026 | 45 |
| 38 | emergency doctrine | Geis v. Hirth | 85 | 2 | 1928–2025 | 2 |
| 39 | plain meaning analysis | State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County | 82 | 2 | 1968–2025 | 28 |
| 40 | reducing clause | Badger Mutual Insurance v. Schmitz | 82 | 2 | 1980–2026 | 8 |
| 41 | sovereign immunity | Lister v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System | 82 | 3 | 1962–2026 | 11 |
| 42 | Brady violation | Brady v. Maryland | 81 | 3 | 1971–2026 | 47 |
| 43 | separation of powers doctrine | State v. Holmes | 80 | 3 | 1941–2025 | 11 |
| 44 | Alford plea | North Carolina v. Alford | 76 | 2 | 1981–2026 | 19 |
| 45 | test for harmless error | State v. Dyess | 75 | 2 | 1974–2026 | 6 |
| 46 | elementary principle | Fitz v. Industrial Commission | 71 | 3 | 1862–2022 | 2 |
| 47 | latitude rule | State v. Davidson | 69 | 2 | 1873–2026 | 36 |
| 48 | vagueness challenge | State v. Pittman | 67 | 2 | 1979–2026 | 6 |
| 49 | motion without hearing | State v. Bentley | 65 | 2 | 1974–2026 | 23 |
| 50 | sufficiency of the evidence standard | State v. Poellinger | 65 | 2 | 1986–2026 | 28 |
| 51 | postconviction evidentiary hearing | State v. MacHner | 64 | 2 | 1988–2026 | 29 |
| 52 | Tbe rule | Pumorlo v. City of Merrill | 63 | 1 | 1863–1918 | 0 |
| 53 | circumstances claim | State v. Jimothy A. Jenkins | 62 | 2 | 1915–2026 | 14 |
| 54 | lesser included offense instruction | State v. Sarabia | 62 | 2 | 1984–2026 | 15 |
| 55 | estoppel doctrine | Department of Revenue v. Moebius Printing Co. | 61 | 2 | 1869–2023 | 3 |
| 56 | blanket rule | Richards v. Wisconsin | 60 | 2 | 1980–2026 | 6 |
| 57 | guilty plea waiver | State v. Riekkoff | 59 | 2 | 1980–2026 | 22 |
| 58 | claim preclusion doctrine | Northern States Power Co. v. Bugher | 59 | 2 | 1996–2026 | 19 |
| 59 | process analysis | State Ex Rel. Kalal v. Circuit Court for Dane County | 58 | 2 | 1981–2025 | 18 |
| 60 | uniformity clause | Gottlieb v. City of Milwaukee | 57 | 3 | 1904–2026 | 5 |
| 61 | manifest injustice test | State v. Thomas | 56 | 2 | 1969–2026 | 18 |
| 62 | refusal hearing | State v. Nordness | 56 | 3 | 1891–2026 | 18 |
| 63 | Daubert standard | Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. | 55 | 2 | 2013–2026 | 32 |
| 64 | procedural due process claim | State v. Ehlenfeldt | 55 | 2 | 1972–2025 | 8 |
| 65 | subrogation waiver | Schulte v. Frazin | 55 | 2 | 1913–2019 | 0 |
| 66 | exigent circumstances exception | Missouri v. McNeely | 55 | 2 | 1982–2026 | 14 |
| 67 | judicially created doctrine | Daanen & Janssen, Inc. v. Cedarapids, Inc. | 54 | 2 | 1997–2025 | 9 |
| 68 | self-defense instruction | State v. Robert Joseph Stietz | 54 | 2 | 1973–2026 | 22 |
| 69 | sense test | State v. Young | 53 | 2 | 1982–2026 | 22 |
| 70 | law of the case doctrine | State v. Stuart | 52 | 2 | 1986–2026 | 22 |
| 71 | discretionary standard | State v. Veach | 52 | 3 | 1970–2026 | 15 |
| 72 | reasonable suspicion standard | State v. Post | 52 | 2 | 1987–2026 | 28 |
| 73 | mootness doctrine | Marathon County v. D. K. | 52 | 2 | 1986–2026 | 38 |
| 74 | extension hearing | Winnebago County v. S.H. | 51 | 2 | 1951–2026 | 21 |
| 75 | frequency error | State v. Mayo | 51 | 2 | 1981–2026 | 19 |
| 76 | Sixth Amendment violation | Strickland v. Washington | 51 | 2 | 1980–2025 | 10 |
| 77 | factor analysis | Rosado v. State | 51 | 2 | 1979–2026 | 13 |
| 78 | public trust doctrine | Muench v. Public Service Commission | 51 | 3 | 1972–2026 | 5 |
| 79 | newly discovered evidence test | State v. Plude | 50 | 2 | 1991–2026 | 29 |
| 80 | stare decisis doctrine | Payne v. Tennessee | 50 | 2 | 1918–2024 | 10 |
| 81 | bad faith claim | Anderson v. Continental Insurance | 49 | 2 | 1984–2025 | 9 |
| 82 | substantive due process challenge | State v. Smet | 49 | 2 | 1989–2024 | 3 |
| 83 | right to present defense | State v. Pulizzano | 49 | 2 | 1889–2026 | 9 |
| 84 | recommitment hearing | Langlade County v. D. J. W. | 49 | 2 | 1991–2026 | 36 |
| 85 | three primary factors | State v. Harris | 48 | 3 | 1981–2026 | 7 |
| 86 | community caretaker exception | State v. Pinkard | 47 | 2 | 1989–2026 | 18 |
| 87 | concluded defense | State v. Hatem M. Shata | 47 | 2 | 1962–2025 | 3 |
| 88 | overbreadth doctrine | State v. Stevenson | 47 | 3 | 1978–2021 | 1 |
| 89 | collateral source rule | Koffman v. Leichtfuss | 46 | 2 | 1972–2026 | 2 |
| 90 | first step analysis | State v. Sullivan | 46 | 2 | 1981–2025 | 21 |
| 91 | great weight standard | UFE Inc. v. Labor & Industry Review Commission | 46 | 2 | 1994–2014 | 0 |
| 92 | exclusion clause | Frye v. Theige | 46 | 3 | 1937–2026 | 6 |
| 93 | First Amendment challenge | Center for Individual Freedom v. Madigan | 46 | 2 | 1982–2026 | 5 |
| 94 | statute of limitations defense | State Ex Rel. Susedik v. Knutson | 46 | 2 | 1884–2026 | 8 |
| 95 | exhaustion doctrine | Nodell Investment Corp. v. City of Glendale | 46 | 2 | 1974–2026 | 6 |
| 96 | consent exception | State v. Artic | 46 | 2 | 1882–2026 | 16 |
| 97 | meaningful defense | State v. Klessig | 45 | 3 | 1978–2026 | 13 |
| 98 | standing challenge | Fox v. Wisconsin Department of Health & Social Services | 45 | 2 | 1974–2026 | 12 |
| 99 | available claim | State v. Andres Romero-Georgana | 44 | 2 | 1959–2026 | 28 |
| 100 | multiplicity test | State v. Anderson | 44 | 2 | 1985–2026 | 10 |
| 101 | pattern jury instruction | State v. Ellington | 44 | 2 | 1982–2025 | 6 |
| 102 | unjust enrichment claim | Watts v. Watts | 44 | 2 | 1975–2026 | 10 |
| 103 | factual basis requirement | State v. Smith | 44 | 2 | 1968–2025 | 10 |
| 104 | policy factors | Pouwels v. Cheese Makers Mutual Casualty Co. | 44 | 3 | 1953–2026 | 4 |
| 105 | recreational immunity | Hall v. Turtle Lake Lions Club | 44 | 2 | 1990–2022 | 3 |
| 106 | postconviction motion without hearing | State v. Allen | 43 | 2 | 1997–2026 | 30 |
| 107 | section 51.20(1) finding of dangerousness | Langlade County v. D. J. W. | 43 | 2 | 2007–2026 | 31 |
| 108 | respondeat superior doctrine | Arsand v. City of Franklin | 42 | 3 | 1922–2026 | 4 |
| 109 | immunity defense | Lodl v. Progressive Northern Insurance | 42 | 2 | 1923–2026 | 2 |
| 110 | American rule | Watkins v. Labor & Industry Review Commission | 42 | 2 | 1871–2016 | 0 |
| 111 | equitable estoppel doctrine | Marriage of Ajn & Jmn v. Ajn | 41 | 2 | 1882–2024 | 6 |
| 112 | home rule | New York v. Harris | 41 | 3 | 1912–2024 | 6 |
| 113 | plain view doctrine | State v. Guy | 41 | 2 | 1973–2025 | 6 |
| 114 | manifest error | Koepsell's Olde Popcorn Wagons, Inc. v. Koepsell's Festival Popcorn Wagons, Ltd. | 41 | 2 | 1955–2026 | 28 |
| 115 | section 974.06 postconviction motion | State v. Escalona-Naranjo | 41 | 2 | 1994–2026 | 14 |
| 116 | adverse effect defense | Strickland v. Washington | 40 | 2 | 1990–2026 | 15 |
| 117 | alibi defense | State v. Allen | 40 | 2 | 1967–2026 | 13 |
| 118 | issue preclusion doctrine | Aldrich v. Labor & Industry Review Commission | 40 | 2 | 1990–2026 | 16 |
| 119 | prerequisite claim | State v. MacHner | 40 | 2 | 1969–2026 | 11 |
| 120 | second part test | State v. Sauceda | 40 | 2 | 1984–2026 | 12 |
| 121 | commitment hearing | State Ex Rel. Lockman v. Gerhardstein | 40 | 2 | 1980–2026 | 16 |
| 122 | bench bar | State v. Henley | 39 | 2 | 1877–2026 | 8 |
| 123 | controversy claim | Loy v. Bunderson | 39 | 2 | 1953–2026 | 4 |
| 124 | laches doctrine | State Ex Rel. Coleman v. McCaughtry | 39 | 2 | 1927–2026 | 7 |
| 125 | res ipsa loquitur instruction | Fehrman v. Smirl | 39 | 2 | 1914–2025 | 4 |
| 126 | low bar | State v. Avan Rondell Nimmer | 39 | 2 | 2012–2026 | 33 |
| 127 | direct claim | Rose v. Schantz | 38 | 2 | 1876–2025 | 8 |
| 128 | particularity requirement | State v. Noll | 38 | 2 | 1874–2025 | 13 |
| 129 | personal waiver | State v. Livingston | 38 | 2 | 1876–2021 | 1 |
| 130 | conditional privilege | Zinda v. Louisiana Pacific Corp. | 38 | 2 | 1914–2026 | 3 |
| 131 | Blockburger test | Blockburger v. United States | 37 | 2 | 1979–2023 | 5 |
| 132 | Powers rule | Powers v. Allstate Insurance | 36 | 2 | 1960–2020 | 0 |
| 133 | qualified immunity | Harlow v. Fitzgerald | 36 | 2 | 1975–2026 | 3 |
| 134 | structural error | Neder v. United States | 36 | 2 | 2003–2025 | 14 |
| 135 | interpretation clause | In RE MARRIAGE OF HARRIS v. Harris | 36 | 2 | 1923–2024 | 7 |
| 136 | res judicata doctrine | Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp. | 36 | 2 | 1929–2005 | 0 |
| 137 | second step analysis | State v. Plymesser | 36 | 2 | 1988–2026 | 11 |
| 138 | Bentley test | State v. Bentley | 35 | 2 | 1995–2025 | 11 |
| 139 | commerce clause | Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. Brady | 35 | 3 | 1929–2011 | 0 |
| 140 | firmly rooted hearsay exception | Ohio v. Roberts | 35 | 2 | 1981–2021 | 1 |
| 141 | coverage clause | Cieslewicz Ex Rel. Finerty v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance | 35 | 2 | 1932–2022 | 1 |
| 142 | reasons rule | Nodell Investment Corp. v. City of Glendale | 35 | 2 | 1878–2020 | 0 |
| 143 | contested case hearing | Milwaukee Metropolitan Sewerage District v. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources | 34 | 2 | 1983–2025 | 7 |
| 144 | deficient performance analysis | State v. Johnson | 34 | 2 | 1993–2025 | 11 |
| 145 | known right privilege | Johnson v. Zerbst | 34 | 2 | 1971–2026 | 1 |
| 146 | attorney-client privilege | State v. Meeks | 34 | 3 | 1974–2026 | 3 |
| 147 | hearing inquiry | Matter of Mental Condition of Shirley JC | 34 | 2 | 1890–2026 | 9 |
| 148 | postconviction motion hearing | State v. Allen | 34 | 2 | 1984–2024 | 10 |
| 149 | facts satisfy the statutory standard | Waukesha County v. J.W.J. | 34 | 2 | 2017–2026 | 32 |
| 150 | establishment clause | Lemon v. Kurtzman | 34 | 3 | 1844–2020 | 0 |
Top 150 by distinct citing opinions.