requested defensive instruction (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

requested defensive instruction in Texas

127 Texas opinions name it 5 courts 1997–2026 26 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (16)

CaseFollowedCited
Bufkin v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 2006 · cited in 58 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2007–2026
2 sentences

2026App. 2011) (quoting Tex. Penal Code Ann. § 2.05 (b)(1)). “[W]hen reviewing a trial court’s decision to deny a requested defensive instruction, . . . we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the defendant’s requested submission.” Bufkin v. State, 207 S.W.3d 779, 782 (Tex. Crim.

2026When reviewing a trial court’s decision to deny a requested defensive instruction, “we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the defendant’s requested submission.” Bufkin v. State, 207 S.W.3d 779, 782 (Tex. Crim.

5758
Hamel v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1996 · cited in 22 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1997–2021
2 sentences

2021Id.

2016Hamel v. State, 916 S.W.2d 491, 493 (Tex. Crim.

1822
Farmer, Kody Williamgreen
texcrimapp · 2013 · cited in 14 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2016–2024
2 sentences

2024Farmer v. State, 411 S.W.3d 901, 906 (Tex. Crim.

2020Farmer v. State, 411 S.W.3d 901, 906 (Tex. Crim.

1414
Gamino, Cesar Alejandrogreen
texcrimapp · 2017 · cited in 12 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2018–2025
2 sentences

2023“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the defendant’s requested defensive instruction.” Id. (citing Gamino v. State, 537 S.W.3d 507, 510 (Tex. Crim.

2023“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the defendant’s requested defensive instruction.” Id. (citing Gamino v. State, 537 S.W.3d 507, 510 (Tex. Crim.

1112
Brazelton v. Stategreen
texapp · 1997 · cited in 10 Texas opinions naming this issue, 1999–2011
2 sentences

2011See Brazelton, 947 S.W.2d at 646 ; see also Lowe, 2008 Tex. App. LEXIS 3666 , at *2.

2008Id.

810
Hayes v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1987 · cited in 6 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2009–2020
2 sentences

2020Hayes v. State, 728 S.W.2d 804, 807 (Tex. Crim.

2010Hayes v. State, 728 S.W.2d 804, 807 (Tex.Crim.App.1987).

36
Ferrel v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 2001 · cited in 5 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2008–2015
2 sentences

2015Bufkin v. State, 207 S.W.3d 779, 782 (Tex.Crim.App.2006); Ferrel v. State, 55 S.W.3d 586, 591 (Tex.Crim.App. 2001).

2012However, “if the evidence, viewed in the light most favorable to the defendant, does not establish self-defense, the defendant is not entitled to an instruction on the issue.” Ferrel, 55 S.W.3d at 591 .

25
Beltran, Ricardo v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 2015 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2021–2024
2 sentences

2024Beltran v. State, 472 S.W.3d 283, 290 (Tex. Crim.

2021Beltran v. State, 472 S.W.3d 283, 290 (Tex. Crim.

22
Walters v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 2007 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
2 sentences

2016Proc. art. 36.14. 14 Walters v. State, 247 S.W.3d 204, 208-09 (Tex. Crim.

2016Proc. art. 36.14. 3 Walters v. State, 247 S.W.3d 204, 208-09 (Tex. Crim.

22
Arline v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1986 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003
2 sentences

2003Arline v. State, 721 S.W.2d 348, 351-52 (Tex. Crim.

2003Arline v. State , 721 S.W.2d 348, 351-52 (Tex. Crim.

22
Shaw v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 2007 · cited in 8 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2013–2023
2 sentences

2023“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the defendant’s requested defensive instruction.” Id. (citing Gamino v. State, 537 S.W.3d 507, 510 (Tex. Crim.

2023“We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the defendant’s requested defensive instruction.” Id. (citing Gamino v. State, 537 S.W.3d 507, 510 (Tex. Crim.

18
Pennington v. Stategreen
texapp · 2001 · cited in 4 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2009–2013
2 sentences

2013Pennington v. State, 54 S.W.3d 852, 859 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd) (finding some harm when the defendant admitted to possessing contraband and no instruction was given on the defense of necessity).

2009Almanza, 686 S.W.2d at 171 ; Pennington, 54 S.W.3d at 856 .

14
Shawn Pierre Lee v. Stategreen
texapp · 2014 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2016–2018
2 sentences

2018Bufkin, 207 S.W.3d at 782 ; Lee, 442 S.W.3d at 577 .

2016“When reviewing a trial court’s decision to deny a requested defensive instruction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the defendant’s requested submission.” Lee v. State, 442 S.W.3d 569, 576-77 (Tex.App.-San Antonio 2014), citing Bufkin v. State, 207 S.W.3d 779, 782 (Tex.Crim.App.2006).

12
Kirsch, Scott Alangreen
texcrimapp · 2012 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2022–2022
1 sentence

2022See Kirsch v. State, 357 S.W.3d 645, 649 (Tex. Crim.

11
Granger v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1999 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2010–2010
1 sentence

2010Granger v. State, 3 S.W.3d 36, 38 (Tex. Crim.

11
Miller v. Stategreen
texcrimapp · 1991 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2001–2001
1 sentence

2001Hamel v. State, 916 S.W.2d 491, 493 (Tex.Crim.App.1996) (recognizing that “an accused has the right to an instruction on any defensive issue raised by the evidence, whether that evidence is weak or strong, unimpeached or contradicted, and regardless of what the trial court may or may not think about the credibility of the defense”); Miller v. State 815 S.W.2d 582, 585 (Tex.Crim.App.1991) (op. on reh’g); Brazelton v. State, 947 S.W.2d 644, 646 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1997, no pet.).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

CaseCitedYears
Almanza v. State green
texcrimapp · 1985
2 sentences

2018Id.

2018Id.

72009–2018
Durden v. State green
texapp · 2009
2 sentences

2010Durden, 290 S.W.3d at 416 .

2010Durden, 290 S.W.3d at 416 .

22010–2010
Barnes v. State green
texapp · 2002
2 sentences

2009Hamel v. State, 916 S.W.2d 491, 493 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996); Barnes, 70 S.W.3d at 304 .

2009Hamel v. State, 916 S.W.2d 491, 493 (Tex.Crim.App. 1996); Barnes, 70 S.W.3d at 304 .

22009–2009
Schier v. State green
texapp · 2001
2 sentences

2015Conclusion Although trial courts should err on the side of caution when considering a requested defensive instruction, they retain a duty to prevent irrational verdicts based on speculation. “[T]he law of self-defense . . . has well-defined limitations, marked 134 Id. at 343 . 135 Id. at 343-44 . 136 Id. at 344 . 137 Id. 138 Id. (citation omitted). 29 out by human experience.

2015Conclusion Although trial courts should err on the side of caution when considering a requested defensive instruction, they retain a duty to prevent irrational verdicts based on speculation. “[T]he law of self-defense . . . has well-defined limitations, marked 134 Id. at 343 . 135 Id. at 343-44 . 136 Id. at 344 . 137 Id. 138 Id. (citation omitted). 29 out by human experience.

12015–2015
Lightbourne v. McCollum green
scotus · 2008
1 sentence

2015Id. (citing Bufkin v. State, 207 S.W.3d 779, 782 (Tex. Crim.

12015–2015
McGarity v. State green
texapp · 1999
1 sentence

2009Id.

12009–2009

Statutes the citing opinions construe

TX § Tex. Penal Code § 9.31 (29) TX § Tex. Penal Code § 9.22 (27) TX § Tex. Penal Code § 1.07 (24) TX § Tex. Penal Code § 2.03 (21) TX § Tex. Penal Code § 19.02 (20) TX § Tex. Penal Code § 9.32 (18) TX § Tex. Penal Code § 9.02 (11) TX § Tex. Penal Code § 22.01 (8) TX § Tex. Penal Code § 8.06 (8) TX § Tex. Penal Code § 31.03 (7) TX § Tex. Penal Code § 8.05 (7) TX § Tex. Penal Code § 22.02 (6)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check