number of other factors in Maryland

19 Maryland opinions name it 2 courts 1977–2025 2 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Maryland courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (11)

Case	Followed	Cited
Bartholomee v. Caseygreen mdctspecapp · 1994 · cited in 5 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1996–2007 2 sentences 2007See Bartholomee, 103 Md.App. at 56 , 651 A.2d 908 (explicating the “substantial factor” test). 2007See Bartholomee, 103 Md.App. at 56 , 651 A.2d 908 (explicating the “substantial factor” test).	4	5
Bainum v. Kalengreen md · 1974 · cited in 5 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1977–2002 2 sentences 1995Where these factors are not so clear, however, or where there are special circumstances explaining a particular place of abode or place of voting, the Court will look to and weigh a number of other factors in deciding a person’s domicile.” With regard to voting or voter registration, “this Court has termed it the ‘highest evidence of domicile,’ ” Bainum v. Kalen, supra, 272 Md. at 498 , 325 A.2d at 397 , quoting Wagner v. Scurlock, supra, 166 Md. at 292 , 170 A. at 542 . 1995Where these factors are not so clear, however, or where there are special circumstances explaining a particular place of abode or place of voting, the Court will look to and weigh a number of other factors in deciding a person’s domicile.” With regard to voting or voter registration, “this Court has termed it the ‘highest evidence of domicile,’ ” Bainum v. Kalen, supra, 272 Md. at 498 , 325 A.2d at 397 , quoting Wagner v. Scurlock, supra, 166 Md. at 292 , 170 A. at 542 .	2	5
Kiriakos v. Phillips Dankos v. Stapfgreen md · 2016 · cited in 2 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2025–2025 2 sentences 2025Id. at 465, 471, 139 A.3d at 1021, 1024-25 . 2025Id. at 465, 471, 139 A.3d at 1021, 1024-25 .	2	2
Pittway Corp. v. Collinsgreen md · 2009 · cited in 2 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2013–2016 2 sentences 2016Pittway, 409 Md. at 245 , 973 A.2d 771 (quoting Section 433 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965)). 2016Pittway, 409 Md. at 245 , 973 A.2d 771 (quoting Section 433 of the Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965)).	1	2
Comptroller of Treasury v. Lenderkinggreen md · 1973 · cited in 2 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1995–2002 2 sentences 2002Furthermore, this Court has stated that the place of voting is the “highest evidence of domicile.” Blount, supra, 351 Md. at 369 , 718 A.2d at 1115 ; Bainum, supra, 272 Md. at 498 , 325 A.2d at 397 (“the two most important elements in determining domicile are where a person actually lives and where he votes”); Roberts, supra, 340 Md. at 154, 665 A.2d at 1027 (“Evidence 374 that a person registered or voted is ... ordinarily persuasive when the question of domicile is at issue,” quoting Comptroller v. Lenderking, 268 Md. 613, 619 , 303 A.2d 402, 405 (1973)). 2002Furthermore, this Court has stated that the place of voting is the “highest evidence of domicile.” Blount, supra, 351 Md. at 369 , 718 A.2d at 1115 ; Bainum, supra, 272 Md. at 498 , 325 A.2d at 397 (“the two most important elements in determining domicile are where a person actually lives and where he votes”); Roberts, supra, 340 Md. at 154, 665 A.2d at 1027 (“Evidence 374 that a person registered or voted is ... ordinarily persuasive when the question of domicile is at issue,” quoting Comptroller v. Lenderking, 268 Md. 613, 619 , 303 A.2d 402, 405 (1973)).	1	2
Asibem Assoc., Ltd. v. Rillgreen md · 1972 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2014–2014 2 sentences 2014It states: The following considerations are in themselves or in combination with one another important in determining whether the actor’s conduct is a substantial factor in bringing about harm to another: (a) the number of other factors which contribute in producing the harm and the extent of the effect which they have in producing it; (b) whether the actor’s conduct has created a force or series of forces which are in continuous and active operation up to the time of the harm, or has created a situation harmless unless acted upon by other forces for which the actor is not responsible; (c) lap 2014It states: The following considerations are in themselves or in combination with one another important in determining whether the actor’s conduct is a substantial factor in bringing about harm to another: (a) the number of other factors which contribute in producing the harm and the extent of the effect which they have in producing it; (b) whether the actor’s conduct has created a force or series of forces which are in continuous and active operation up to the time of the harm, or has created a situation harmless unless acted upon by other forces for which the actor is not responsible; (c) lap	1	1
Roberts v. Lakingreen md · 1995 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 2002–2002 2 sentences 2002Where these factors are not so clear, however, or where there are special circumstances explaining a particular place of abode or place of voting, the Court will look to and weigh a number of other factors in deciding a person’s domicile.” Id., quoting Dorf v. Skolnik, supra, 280 Md. at 116-117, 371 A.2d at 1102-1103 (emphasis in original). 2002Furthermore, this Court has stated that the place of voting is the “highest evidence of domicile.” Blount, supra, 351 Md. at 369 , 718 A.2d at 1115 ; Bainum, supra, 272 Md. at 498 , 325 A.2d at 397 (“the two most important elements in determining domicile are where a person actually lives and where he votes”); Roberts, supra, 340 Md. at 154, 665 A.2d at 1027 (“Evidence *374 that a person registered or voted is ... ordinarily persuasive when the question of domicile is at issue,” quoting Comptroller v. Lenderking, 268 Md. 613, 619 , 303 A.2d 402, 405 (1973)).	1	1
Harrison v. Harrisongreen · 1912 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1995–1995 2 sentences 1995Similarly, as to the place of actual residence, we have held that “ ‘[t]he presumption of the law is that where a person actually lives is his domicile,’ ” Bainum v. Kalen, supra, 272 Md. at 498 , 325 A.2d at 397 , quoting Harrison v. Harrison, 117 Md. 607, 615 , 84 A. 57, 59 (1912). 4 And in Comptroller v. Lenderking, supra, 268 Md. at 619 , 303 A.2d at 405 , the Court stated: “Evidence that a person registered or voted is ... ordinarily persuasive when the question of domicile is at issue. * ❖ * * * * “The act of registering, taken together with the fact that Mr. Lenderking lived ... in Mary 1995Similarly, as to the place of actual residence, we have held that “ ‘[t]he presumption of the law is that where a person actually lives is his domicile,’ ” Bainum v. Kalen, supra, 272 Md. at 498 , 325 A.2d at 397 , quoting Harrison v. Harrison, 117 Md. 607, 615 , 84 A. 57, 59 (1912). 4 And in Comptroller v. Lenderking, supra, 268 Md. at 619 , 303 A.2d at 405 , the Court stated: “Evidence that a person registered or voted is ... ordinarily persuasive when the question of domicile is at issue. * ❖ * * * * “The act of registering, taken together with the fact that Mr. Lenderking lived ... in Mary	1	1
Dorf v. Skolnikgreen md · 1977 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1994–1994 2 sentences 1994Where these factors are not so clear, however, or where there are special circumstances explaining a particular place of abode or place of voting, the Court will look to and weigh a number of other factors in deciding a person’s domicile.” 460 280 Md. at 116-17 , 371 A.2d at 1102-03 (emphasis added). 1994Where these factors are not so clear, however, or where there are special circumstances explaining a particular place of abode or place of voting, the Court will look to and weigh a number of other factors in deciding a person’s domicile.” 460 280 Md. at 116-17 , 371 A.2d at 1102-03 (emphasis added).	1	1
Toll v. Morenogreen md · 1979 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1984–1984 2 sentences 1984Id.; see Toll v. Moreno, 284 Md. 425, 444 , 397 A.2d 1009, 1018 (1979); see also Bainum v. Kalen, 272 Md. 490, 499 , 325 A.2d 392, 397 (1974) (other factors). 1984Id.; see Toll v. Moreno, 284 Md. 425, 444 , 397 A.2d 1009, 1018 (1979); see also Bainum v. Kalen, 272 Md. 490, 499 , 325 A.2d 392, 397 (1974) (other factors).	1	1
Biakanja v. Irvinggreen cal · 1958 · cited in 1 Maryland opinions naming this issue, 1980–1980 1 sentence 1980See, for example, Biakanja v. Irving, 320 P.2d 16, 19 (Cal., 1958); Lucas v. Hamm, supra, 364 P.2d 685 (Cal., 1961).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Maryland. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

Case	Cited	Years
Yonce v. Smithkline Beecham Clinical Laboratories, Inc. green mdctspecapp · 1996 2 sentences 2005Yonce, 111 Md.App. at 138-39 , 680 A.2d 569 (citing Bartholomee v. Casey, 103 Md.App. 34, 56 , 651 A.2d 908 (1994), cert. denied, 338 Md. 557 , 659 A.2d 1293 (1995) (compiling Maryland cases utilizing the “substantial factor” test)). 115 If causation in fact exists, a defendant will not be relieved from liability for an injury if, at the time of the defendant’s negligent act, the defendant should have foreseen the “general field of danger,” not necessarily the specific kind of harm to which the injured party would be subjected as a result of the defendant’s negligence. 2005Yonce, 111 Md.App. at 138-39 , 680 A.2d 569 (citing Bartholomee v. Casey, 103 Md.App. 34, 56 , 651 A.2d 908 (1994), cert. denied, 338 Md. 557 , 659 A.2d 1293 (1995) (compiling Maryland cases utilizing the “substantial factor” test)). 115 If causation in fact exists, a defendant will not be relieved from liability for an injury if, at the time of the defendant’s negligent act, the defendant should have foreseen the “general field of danger,” not necessarily the specific kind of harm to which the injured party would be subjected as a result of the defendant’s negligence.	2	1999–2005
Stone v. Chicago Title Insurance green md · 1993 2 sentences 2009Stone, 330 Md. at 337 , 624 A.2d at 500 . 2009Stone, 330 Md. at 337 , 624 A.2d at 500 .	1	2009–2009
Blount v. Boston green md · 1998 2 sentences 2002Furthermore, this Court has stated that the place of voting is the “highest evidence of domicile.” Blount, supra, 351 Md. at 369 , 718 A.2d at 1115 ; Bainum, supra, 272 Md. at 498 , 325 A.2d at 397 (“the two most important elements in determining domicile are where a person actually lives and where he votes”); Roberts, supra, 340 Md. at 154, 665 A.2d at 1027 (“Evidence 374 that a person registered or voted is ... ordinarily persuasive when the question of domicile is at issue,” quoting Comptroller v. Lenderking, 268 Md. 613, 619 , 303 A.2d 402, 405 (1973)). 2002Furthermore, this Court has stated that the place of voting is the “highest evidence of domicile.” Blount, supra, 351 Md. at 369 , 718 A.2d at 1115 ; Bainum, supra, 272 Md. at 498 , 325 A.2d at 397 (“the two most important elements in determining domicile are where a person actually lives and where he votes”); Roberts, supra, 340 Md. at 154, 665 A.2d at 1027 (“Evidence 374 that a person registered or voted is ... ordinarily persuasive when the question of domicile is at issue,” quoting Comptroller v. Lenderking, 268 Md. 613, 619 , 303 A.2d 402, 405 (1973)).	1	2002–2002
Wagner v. Scurlock green md · 1934 2 sentences 1995Where these factors are not so clear, however, or where there are special circumstances explaining a particular place of abode or place of voting, the Court will look to and weigh a number of other factors in deciding a person’s domicile.” With regard to voting or voter registration, “this Court has termed it the ‘highest evidence of domicile,’ ” Bainum v. Kalen, supra, 272 Md. at 498 , 325 A.2d at 397 , quoting Wagner v. Scurlock, supra, 166 Md. at 292 , 170 A. at 542 . 1995Where these factors are not so clear, however, or where there are special circumstances explaining a particular place of abode or place of voting, the Court will look to and weigh a number of other factors in deciding a person’s domicile.” With regard to voting or voter registration, “this Court has termed it the ‘highest evidence of domicile,’ ” Bainum v. Kalen, supra, 272 Md. at 498 , 325 A.2d at 397 , quoting Wagner v. Scurlock, supra, 166 Md. at 292 , 170 A. at 542 .	1	1995–1995
Martin v. State green mdctspecapp · 1988 2 sentences 1989Although, as we pointed out in Martin v. State, 73 Md.App. 597 , 535 A.2d 951 (1988), there are a number of other factors that a defendant might want to know about and consider in deciding whether to testify, this is one that he must be informed of and hopefully will consider. 1989Although, as we pointed out in Martin v. State, 73 Md.App. 597 , 535 A.2d 951 (1988), there are a number of other factors that a defendant might want to know about and consider in deciding whether to testify, this is one that he must be informed of and hopefully will consider.	1	1989–1989
Lucas v. Hamm green cal · 1961 2 sentences 1980See, for example, Biakanja v. Irving, 320 P.2d 16, 19 (Cal., 1958); Lucas v. Hamm, supra, 364 P.2d 685 (Cal., 1961). 1980See, for example, Biakanja v. Irving, 320 P.2d 16, 19 (Cal., 1958); Lucas v. Hamm, supra, 364 P.2d 685 (Cal., 1961).	1	1980–1980

Where else courts name it

PA 30 (1974–2025) MD 19 (1977–2025) CA 17 (1988–2023) IL 10 (1977–2024) TX 8 (1969–2024) OR 7 (1978–2018) TN 6 (1964–2019) WA 6 (1982–2020) MI 6 (1976–2025) AL 5 (1977–1982) NY 5 (1976–2019) IN 5 (2013–2020) WI 4 (1980–2017) IA 4 (2016–2018) CO 4 (1988–2026) NM 3 (1991–2025) DC 3 (1990–2010) MO 3 (1972–2001) OH 3 (2012–2024) MN 3 (1973–1987) ND 3 (1974–2002) AR 3 (1991–1997) CT 2 (1997–2010) SD 2 (1992–2008) WV 2 (2007–2021) LA 2 (1991–2009) GA 2 (2004–2020)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check