7 Oregon opinions name it 3 courts 1978–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Oregon courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Niemeyer v. Department of Revenuegreen2 sentences2018Accuracy of the study depends upon classification of the properties, whether available sales are representative of the class, and a number of other factors.” Niemeyer v. Dept. of Rev., 14 OTR 34, 35 (1996); see also Clackamas County Assessor v. Village at Main Street Phase II, LLC, 349 Or 330 , 333 n4, 245 P3d 81 (2010) (explaining that, when taxable property is not physically appraised, county assessors apply a ratio to equalize the real market values of comparable property in a “process called ‘trending.’ ”). 2011Accuracy of the study depends upon classification of the properties, whether available sales are representative of the class, and a number of other factors." Id. | 1 | 2 |
Clackamas County Assessor v. Village at Main Street Phase II, LLCgreen2 sentences2018Accuracy of the study depends upon classification of the properties, whether available sales are representative of the class, and a number of other factors.” Niemeyer v. Dept. of Rev., 14 OTR 34, 35 (1996); see also Clackamas County Assessor v. Village at Main Street Phase II, LLC, 349 Or 330 , 333 n4, 245 P3d 81 (2010) (explaining that, when taxable property is not physically appraised, county assessors apply a ratio to equalize the real market values of comparable property in a “process called ‘trending.’ ”). 2018Accuracy of the study depends upon classification of the properties, whether available sales are representative of the class, and a number of other factors.” Niemeyer v. Dept. of Rev., 14 OTR 34, 35 (1996); see also Clackamas County Assessor v. Village at Main Street Phase II, LLC, 349 Or 330 , 333 n4, 245 P3d 81 (2010) (explaining that, when taxable property is not physically appraised, county assessors apply a ratio to equalize the real market values of comparable property in a “process called ‘trending.’ ”). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Oregon. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Marriage of Kunze
green
2 sentences2008Id. at 134-35 . 2006Kunze, 337 Or at 134-35 . | 2 | 2006–2008 |
Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.
green
1 sentence2007Ailes, 312 Or at 382 n 6. | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty.
green
2 sentences1978The county governing body is directed by ORS 215.055 to consider a number of other factors when enacting zoning ordinances, and the list there does not purport to be exclusive. * * *" 264 Or. at 585 , 507 P.2d at 28 . 1978The county governing body is directed by ORS 215.055 to consider a number of other factors when enacting zoning ordinances, and the list there does not purport to be exclusive. * * *" 264 Or. at 585 , 507 P.2d at 28 . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Marsh v. Davidson
green
1 sentence1978The Supreme Court affirmed, stating that while "[t]he amount of a settlement may have * * * some bearing on the severity of plaintiff’s injuries, * * * it might also [be] the product of a number of other factors * * 265 Or at 538 . | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.