isolated instruction in Kansas

18 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1988–2013 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (1)

Case	Followed	Cited
United States v. Cronicgreen scotus · 1984 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 1988–1988 2 sentences 1988Ed. 2d 397 , 106 S. Ct. 2639 (1986),] reaffirmed that ‘the right to effective assistance of counsel . . . may in a particular case be violated by even an isolated error ... if that error is sufficiently egregious and prejudicial.’ Ante, at 496; see also United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 657, n. 20 , 80 L. 1988Ed. 2d 397 , 106 S. Ct. 2639 (1986),] reaffirmed that ‘the right to effective assistance of counsel . . . may in a particular case be violated by even an isolated error ... if that error is sufficiently egregious and prejudicial.’ Ante, at 496; see also United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 657, n. 20 , 80 L.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (12)

Case	Cited	Years
Wood v. Groh green kan · 2000 2 sentences 2010If the instructions are substantially correct and the juiy could not reasonably have been misled by them, the instructions will be approved on appeal.” Wood v. Groh, 269 Kan. 420, 423-24 , 7 P.3d 1163 (2000). 2010If the instructions are substantially correct and the juiy could not reasonably have been misled by them, the instructions will be approved on appeal.” Wood v. Groh, 269 Kan. 420, 423-24 , 7 P.3d 1163 (2000).	4	2005–2010
Wolfe Electric, Inc. v. Duckworth green kan · 2011 2 sentences 2013If the instructions are substantially correct, and the jury could not reasonably be misled by them, the instructions will be approved on appeal.’ [Citation omitted]” Wolfe Electric, Inc. v. Duckworth, 293 Kan. 375, 383 , 266 P.3d 516 (2011). 2013If the instructions are substantially correct, and the jury could not reasonably be misled by them, the instructions will be approved on appeal.’ [Citation omitted]” Wolfe Electric, Inc. v. Duckworth, 293 Kan. 375, 383 , 266 P.3d 516 (2011).	2	2012–2013
In Re the Care & Treatment of Foster green kan · 2006 2 sentences 2012If the instructions are substantially correct, and the jury could not reasonably be misled by them, the instructions will be approved on appeal.’ ” Wolfe Electric, Inc., 293 Kan. at 383 (quoting In re Care & Treatment of Foster, 280 Kan. 845 , Syl. ¶ 10, 127 P.3d 277 [2006]). 2012If the instructions are substantially correct, and the jury could not reasonably be misled by them, the instructions will be approved on appeal.’ ” Wolfe Electric, Inc., 293 Kan. at 383 (quoting In re Care & Treatment of Foster, 280 Kan. 845 , Syl. ¶ 10, 127 P.3d 277 [2006]).	2	2011–2012
Noel v. Pizza Management, Inc. green kan · 1995 2 sentences 1999If the instructions are substantially correct, and die juiy could not reasonably be misled by them, the instructions will be approved on appeal.” ’ ” In re Care & Treatment of Hay, 263 Kan. 822, 841-42 , 953 P.2d 666 (1998) (quoting Noel v. Pizza Management, Inc., 258 Kan. 3, 12 , 899 P.2d 1013 [1995]). 1999If the instructions are substantially correct, and die juiy could not reasonably be misled by them, the instructions will be approved on appeal.” ’ ” In re Care & Treatment of Hay, 263 Kan. 822, 841-42 , 953 P.2d 666 (1998) (quoting Noel v. Pizza Management, Inc., 258 Kan. 3, 12 , 899 P.2d 1013 [1995]).	2	1999–1999
Cerretti v. Flint Hills Rural Electric Cooperative Ass'n green kan · 1992 2 sentences 1998If the instructions are substantially correct, and 578 the jury could not reasonably be misled by them, the instructions will be approved on appeal.’ Cerretti v. Flint Hills Rural Electric Co-op Ass’n, 251 Kan. 347, 353 , 837 P.2d 330 (1992).” Also, “ ‘jury instructions are to be considered together and read as a whole, without isolating any one instruction.’ ” Cott v. Peppermint Twist Mgt. 1998If the instructions are substantially correct, and 578 the jury could not reasonably be misled by them, the instructions will be approved on appeal.’ Cerretti v. Flint Hills Rural Electric Co-op Ass’n, 251 Kan. 347, 353 , 837 P.2d 330 (1992).” Also, “ ‘jury instructions are to be considered together and read as a whole, without isolating any one instruction.’ ” Cott v. Peppermint Twist Mgt.	2	1995–1998
Murray v. Carrier green scotus · 1986 2 sentences 1993Ed. 2d 397 , 106 S. Ct. 2639 (1986), as support that an isolated error may be enough to find ineffective assistance of counsel if the ‘error is sufficiently egregious and prejudicial.’ However, [Crease] does not state how the claimed error by his trial attorney is egregious and prejudicial. 1988Ed. 2d 397 , 106 S. Ct. 2639 (1986),] reaffirmed that ‘the right to effective assistance of counsel . . . may in a particular case be violated by even an isolated error ... if that error is sufficiently egregious and prejudicial.’ Ante, at 496; see also United States v. Cronic, 466 U.S. 648, 657, n. 20 , 80 L.	2	1988–1993
State v. McKissack green kan · 2007 2 sentences 2010State v. McKissack, 283 Kan. 721, 732 , 156 P.3d 1249 (2007). 2010State v. McKissack, 283 Kan. 721, 732 , 156 P.3d 1249 (2007).	1	2010–2010
Pullen v. West green kan · 2004 2 sentences 2008If the instructions are substantially correct and the jury could not reasonably have been misled by them, the instructions will be approved on appeal. [Citation omitted.]" (Emphasis added.) Pullen v. West, 278 Kan. 183, 203 , 92 P.3d 584 (2004). 2008If the instructions are substantially correct and the jury could not reasonably have been misled by them, the instructions will be approved on appeal. [Citation omitted.]" (Emphasis added.) Pullen v. West, 278 Kan. 183, 203 , 92 P.3d 584 (2004).	1	2008–2008
Haskell v. Stauffer Communications, Inc. green kanctapp · 1999 1 sentence 2001If the instructions are substantially correct, and die jury could not reasonably be misled by them, the instructions will be approved on appeal.’ ” ’ [Citations omitted.]” Haskell v. Stauffer Communications, Inc., 26 Kan.	1	2001–2001
In Re the Care & Treatment of Hay green kan · 1998 2 sentences 1999If the instructions are substantially correct, and die juiy could not reasonably be misled by them, the instructions will be approved on appeal.” ’ ” In re Care & Treatment of Hay, 263 Kan. 822, 841-42 , 953 P.2d 666 (1998) (quoting Noel v. Pizza Management, Inc., 258 Kan. 3, 12 , 899 P.2d 1013 [1995]). 1999If the instructions are substantially correct, and die juiy could not reasonably be misled by them, the instructions will be approved on appeal.” ’ ” In re Care & Treatment of Hay, 263 Kan. 822, 841-42 , 953 P.2d 666 (1998) (quoting Noel v. Pizza Management, Inc., 258 Kan. 3, 12 , 899 P.2d 1013 [1995]).	1	1999–1999
Guillan v. Watts green kan · 1991 2 sentences 1993If the instructions are substantially correct, and the jury could not reasonably be misled by them, the instructions will be approved on appeal. [Citation omitted.]” Guillan v. Watts, 249 Kan. 606, 617 , 822 P.2d 582 (1991). 1993If the instructions are substantially correct, and the jury could not reasonably be misled by them, the instructions will be approved on appeal. [Citation omitted.]” Guillan v. Watts, 249 Kan. 606, 617 , 822 P.2d 582 (1991).	1	1993–1993
Pilcher v. Board of Wyandotte County Comm'rs green kanctapp · 1990 2 sentences 1991Therefore, if the instructions are substantially correct, they will be approved 147 on appeal because the jury could not reasonably have been misled by them. 14 Kan. 1991*Therefore, if the instructions are substantially correct, they will be approved on appeal because the jury could not reasonably have been misled by them. 14 Kan.	1	1991–1991

Statutes the citing opinions construe

KS § K.S.A. § 60-250 (5) KS § K.S.A. § 20-3018 (4) KS § K.S.A. § 60-251 (4) KS § K.S.A. § 60-258a (3) KS § K.S.A. § 60-401 (3) KS § K.S.A. § 60-456 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

NY 30 (1893–2024) TX 26 (1938–2024) CA 18 (1893–2024) KS 18 (1988–2013) WV 14 (1989–2026) FL 11 (1938–2019) CT 10 (1990–2022) IL 9 (1986–2023) AL 8 (1977–2014) PA 8 (1905–2021) IA 8 (1976–2022) NE 8 (1986–2022) MI 7 (1981–2024) IN 6 (1970–2011) DC 6 (1992–2025) MO 5 (1956–2024) NJ 5 (1968–2014) UT 4 (1992–2019) LA 4 (1952–1993) MA 4 (2001–2024) GA 3 (1940–2025) KY 2 (1978–2023) WA 2 (2015–2015) OR 2 (1973–1990) MN 2 (1987–2016) NC 2 (2020–2020)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check