party from relitigating any claim in New York

2004Pursuant to the doctrine of res judicata, ‘once a claim is brought to a final conclusion, all other claims arising out of the same transaction or series of transactions are barred, even if based upon different theories or if seeking a different remedy’ (O’Brien v City of Syracuse, 54 NY2d 353, 357 ; see also, Smith v Russell Sage Coll., 54 NY2d 185 ; Matter of Reilly v Reid, 45 NY2d 24 ; Feigen v Advance Capital Mgt.

2004Pursuant to the doctrine of res judicata, 'once a claim is brought to a final conclusion, all other claims arising out of the same transaction or series of transactions are barred, even if based upon different theories or if seeking a different remedy' ( O'Brien v City of Syracuse , 54 NY2d 353, 357 ; see also, Smith v Russell Sage Coll. , 54 NY2d 185 ; Matter of Reilly v Reid , 45 NY2d 24 ; Feigen v Advance Capital Mgt.

2004Relations Bd. ( 151 AD2d 168, 185-186 [2d Dept 1989]), the Court instructed that “[t]he doctrine of res judicata prohibits a party from relitigating any claim which could have been or which should have been litigated in a prior proceeding (see, Hyman v Hillelson, 79 AD2d 725, 726 [1980], affd 55 NY2d 624 ).

2004Relations Bd . ( 151 AD2d 168, 185-186 [2d Dept 1989]), the Court instructed that "[t]he doctrine of res judicata prohibits a party from relitigating any claim which could have been or which should have been litigated in a prior proceeding ( see , Hyman v Hillelson , 79 AD2d 725, 726 [1980], affd 55 NY2d 624 ).

2025"The doctrine of res judicata bars a party from relitigating any claim which could have been or should have been litigated in a prior proceeding" ( id. , quoting Chapman Steamer Collective, LLC v KeyBank N.A. , 163 AD3d 760, 761). "'One linchpin of res judicata is an identity of parties actually litigating successive actions against each other: the doctrine applies only when a claim between the parties has been previously brought to a final conclusion'" ( Simmons v Trans Express Inc. , 37 NY3d 107, 111 [emphasis and internal quotation marks omitted], quoting City of New York v Welsbach Elec.

2025"The doctrine of res judicata bars a party from relitigating any claim which could have been or should have been litigated in a prior proceeding" ( id. , quoting Chapman Steamer Collective, LLC v KeyBank N.A. , 163 AD3d 760, 761). "'One linchpin of res judicata is an identity of parties actually litigating successive actions against each other: the doctrine applies only when a claim between the parties has been previously brought to a final conclusion'" ( Simmons v Trans Express Inc. , 37 NY3d 107, 111 [emphasis and internal quotation marks omitted], quoting City of New York v Welsbach Elec.

2019"The doctrine of res judicata bars a party from relitigating any claim which could have been or should have been litigated in a prior proceeding" ( Matter of Board of Fire Commrs. of the Fairview Fire Dist. v Town of Poughkeepsie Planning Bd. , 156 AD3d at 627 ).

2018"The doctrine of res judicata bars a party from relitigating any claim which could have been or should have been litigated in a prior proceeding" ( Matter of Board of Fire Commrs. of the Fairview Fire Dist. v Town of Poughkeepsie Planning Bd. , 156 AD3d at 627 ). " A judgment of foreclosure and sale entered against a defendant is final as to all questions at issue between the parties, and concludes all matters of defense which were or might have been litigated in the foreclosure action'" ( Malgeo Constr.

2024"The doctrine of res judicata bars a party from relitigating any claim which could have been or should have been litigated in a prior proceeding" ( Chapman Steamer Collective, LLC v KeyBank N.A. , 163 AD3d at 761 [internal quotation marks omitted]). "'A stipulation of discontinuance with prejudice without reservation of right or limitation of the claims disposed of is [*2]entitled to preclusive effect under the doctrine of res judicata'" ( Cora v Ranjan , 98 AD3d 598, 599 , quoting Liberty Assoc. v Etkin , 69 AD3d 681, 682-683 ; see DeSouza v LSREF2 Apex 2, LLC , 171 AD3d 702 , 703).

2024"The doctrine of res judicata bars a party from relitigating any claim which could have been or should have been litigated in a prior proceeding" ( Chapman Steamer Collective, LLC v KeyBank N.A. , 163 AD3d at 761 [internal quotation marks omitted]). "'A stipulation of discontinuance with prejudice without reservation of right or limitation of the claims disposed of is [*2]entitled to preclusive effect under the doctrine of res judicata'" ( Cora v Ranjan , 98 AD3d 598, 599 , quoting Liberty Assoc. v Etkin , 69 AD3d 681, 682-683 ; see DeSouza v LSREF2 Apex 2, LLC , 171 AD3d 702 , 703).

2023The doctrine of res judicata bars a party from relitigating any claim which could have been or should have been litigated in a prior proceeding ( see id. ).

2023"A judgment of foreclosure and sale entered against a defendant is final as to all questions at issue between the parties, and concludes all matters of defense which were or might have been raised in the foreclosure action" ( id. ).

2023"The doctrine of res judicata bars a party from relitigating any claim which could have been or should have been litigated in a prior proceeding" ( Montoute v Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. , 208 AD3d at 475 , quoting Chapman Steamer Collective, LLC v KeyBank N.A. , 163 AD3d at 761).

2023Servs., Inc. , 39 AD3d 583, 584-585 ).

2023"The doctrine of res judicata bars a party from relitigating any claim which could have been or should have been litigated in a prior proceeding" ( Chapman Steamer Collective, LLC v KeyBank N.A. , 163 AD3d at 761 [internal quotation marks omitted]). "'A judgment of foreclosure and sale is final as to all questions at issue between the parties, and concludes all matters of defense which were or could have been litigated in the foreclosure action'" ( Eaddy v US Bank N.A. , 180 AD3d at 758 , quoting Ciraldo v JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. , 140 AD3d 912, 913 ; see 83-17 Broadway Corp. v Debcon Fin.

2018Corp. v Oehlrich , 292 AD2d 429, 430 , quoting Long Is.

1998The doctrine bars further litigation between the same parties on the same cause of action (see, Matter of Hodes v Axelrod, 70 NY2d 364 ), and is applicable to a judgment taken by default that has not been vacated (Robbins v Growney, 229 AD2d 356, 357 ).

1998The doctrine bars further litigation between the same parties on the same cause of action (see, Matter of Hodes v Axelrod, 70 NY2d 364 ), and is applicable to a judgment taken by default that has not been vacated (Robbins v Growney, 229 AD2d 356, 357 ).

1996Relations Bd. ( 151 AD2d 168, 185-186 , affd 76 NY2d 579 ) we formulated the familiar definition of res judicata, or claim preclusion, in the following terms: "The doctrine of res judicata prohibits a party from relitigating any claim which could have been or which should have been litigated in a prior proceeding (see, Hyman v Hillelson, 79 AD2d 725, 726 , affd 55 NY2d 624 ).