15 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1978–2022 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Stinsongreen2 sentences1998See People v. Stinson, 200 Ill. 1998See People v. Stinson, 200 Ill.App.3d 223, 224 , 146 Ill.Dec. 679, 680 , 558 N.E.2d 642, 643 (1990); People v. Jones, 176 Ill.App.3d 460, 465-66 , 125 Ill.Dec. 909, 913 , 531 N.E.2d 88, 92 (1988). | 2 | 2 |
In Re ADgreen2 sentences1998App. 3d 158 , 556 N.E.2d 799 (1990), similarly upheld the trial court’s determination that the respondent was “ ‘unwilling or unable’ to care for her children, as those terms are used in section 2 — 27 of the *** Act,” at the time of the dispositional hearing after a finding of neglect based upon the sexual abuse of one of the minors performed by the minor’s stepfather. 199 Ill. 1998App. 3d 158 , 556 N.E.2d 799 (1990), similarly upheld the trial court’s determination that the respondent was “ ‘unwilling or unable’ to care for her children, as those terms are used in section 2 — 27 of the *** Act,” at the time of the dispositional hearing after a finding of neglect based upon the sexual abuse of one of the minors performed by the minor’s stepfather. 199 Ill. | 1 | 2 |
People v. I.S-P.green1 sentence2022In re K.L.S.-P., 381 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
In Re CWgreen1 sentence2020Where a service plan has been established, “‘failure to make reasonable progress toward the return of the child to the parent’ includes the parent’s failure to - 11 - 2020 IL App (2d) 200425-U substantially fulfill his or her obligations under the service plan and correct the conditions that brought the child into care during any 9-month period following the adjudication” of neglected minor. 750 ILCS 50/l(D)(m)(ii) (West 2016); see C.W., 199 Ill. 2d at 213-14 (2002) (“reasonable progress” includes a parent’s compliance with court directives). ¶ 47 Caseworker McKenney testified that at the time | 1 | 1 |
In Interest of Mzgreen1 sentence2020More recently, and in a case involving a minor, the Fourth District opined that “Generally, restitution must be ordered at the time of the dispositional hearing after a minor has been found delinquent.” (Emphasis added.) In re M.Z., 296 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
People v. Jonesgreen2 sentences1998See People v. Stinson, 200 Ill.App.3d 223, 224 , 146 Ill.Dec. 679, 680 , 558 N.E.2d 642, 643 (1990); People v. Jones, 176 Ill.App.3d 460, 465-66 , 125 Ill.Dec. 909, 913 , 531 N.E.2d 88, 92 (1988). 1998See People v. Stinson, 200 Ill.App.3d 223, 224 , 146 Ill.Dec. 679, 680 , 558 N.E.2d 642, 643 (1990); People v. Jones, 176 Ill.App.3d 460, 465-66 , 125 Ill.Dec. 909, 913 , 531 N.E.2d 88, 92 (1988). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re Griffin
green
2 sentences2017Id. at 52 . 2017Id. at 52 . | 2 | 2017–2017 |
In Re Andrea F.
green
2 sentences2002Without a warning of the risks, at least by the time of the dispositional hearing, respondent could not appreciate the importance of compliance.” Andrea F., 327 Ill. 2002Without a warning of the risks, at least by the time of the dispositional hearing, respondent could not appreciate the importance of compliance." Andrea F. , 327 Ill. | 2 | 2002–2002 |
In Interest of Lakita B.
green
1 sentence2022The First District observed that the respondent mother did not challenge the court’s finding that she was unable and concluded, “Because of respondent’s failure to object to such a finding and her concession that the evidence established that she was unable at the time of the dispositional hearing to effectively care for the minors, respondent has waived the issue on appeal of the trial court’s finding that she was unable to care for the minor children.” Id. at 991-92 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
In re Tyianna J.
green
1 sentence2019Allinia has not challenged a deprivation of any of the Mathews elements in her due process challenge. ¶ 103 Recently, the First Division of this court observed, “as a matter of policy, the State should not routinely seek termination of a parent’s rights at the time of the dispositional hearing, but - 33 Nos. 1-18-2290 and 1-18-2429 (Cons.) should, instead, expedite termination through a combined termination and dispositional hearing only in limited and ‘aggravated’ circumstances.” Tyianna J., 2017 IL App (1st) 162306, ¶ 70 . ¶ 104 As noted earlier, the Juvenile Court Act allows for an expedi | 1 | 2019–2019 |
In Re Brooks
green
1 sentence1990Although there is no evidence which indicates that either A.D. or C.D. was abused by Billy, the fact of C.L.D.'s abuse is enough to sustain the trial court's conclusion that these two children needed to be *163 removed from Anita's home. ( In re Brooks (1978), 63 Ill. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
In Re Interest of Stacey
green
2 sentences1978I do not find that In re Stacey (1973), 16 Ill. 1978I do not find that In re Stacey (1973), 16 Ill. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.