15 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1997–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Peete v. Stategreen2 sentences2014Ind. Code § 14-22-38-7 (d). “‘It is well-settled that a police officer may briefly detain a person whom the officer believes has committed an infraction or an ordinance violation.” Datzek v. State, 838 N.E.2d 1149, 1154 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005) (quoting Peete v. State, 678 N.E.2d 415, 419 (Ind. Ct. App. 1997), trans. denied), trans. denied. 2014The State argues that Officer Packard had reasonable suspicion to stop Williams for violation of an infraction. “ ‘It is well-settled that a police officer may briefly detain a person whom the officer believes has committed an infraction or an ordinance violation.’ ” Datzek v. State, 838 N.E.2d 1149, 1154 (Ind.Ct.App.2005), trans. denied (quoting Peete v. State, 678 N.E.2d 415, 419 (Ind.Ct.App.1997), trans. denied). | 10 | 10 |
Datzek v. Stategreen2 sentences2015“It is well-settled that a police officer may briefly detain a person whom the officer believes has committed an infraction or an ordinance violation.” Goens v. State, 943 N.E.2d 829, 832 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011) (quoting Datzek v. State, 838 N.E.2d 1149, 1154 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005), trans. denied). [8] Here, we find that Officer Wooten had reasonable suspicion to stop Harris’s car because his temporary license plate was improperly displayed. 2014Ind. Code § 14-22-38-7 (d). “‘It is well-settled that a police officer may briefly detain a person whom the officer believes has committed an infraction or an ordinance violation.” Datzek v. State, 838 N.E.2d 1149, 1154 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005) (quoting Peete v. State, 678 N.E.2d 415, 419 (Ind. Ct. App. 1997), trans. denied), trans. denied. | 7 | 7 |
Goens v. Stategreen2 sentences2015“It is well-settled that a police officer may briefly detain a person whom the officer believes has committed an infraction or an ordinance violation.” Goens v. State, 943 N.E.2d 829, 832 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011) (quoting Datzek v. State, 838 N.E.2d 1149, 1154 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005), trans. denied). [8] Here, we find that Officer Wooten had reasonable suspicion to stop Harris’s car because his temporary license plate was improperly displayed. 2013See Goens v. State, 943 N.E.2d 829, 832 (Ind. Ct. App. 2011) (noting that “[i]t is well-settled that a police officer 4 may briefly detain a person whom the officer believes has committed an infraction or an ordinance violation” (quoting Datzek v. State, 838 N.E.2d 1149, 1154 (Ind. Ct. App. 2005), trans. denied). | 2 | 2 |
Conwell v. Stategreen2 sentences2002Conwell v. State, 714 N.E.2d 764, 766 (Ind.Ct.App.1999). 2002Conwell v. State, 714 N.E.2d 764, 766 (Ind.Ct.App.1999). | 2 | 2 |
English v. Stategreen1 sentence1997See 34-4-32-2; English v. State, 603 N.E.2d 161,163 (Ind.Ct. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Kelley v. State
green
1 sentence2009Id. *342 "'It is well-settled that a police officer may briefly detain a person whom the officer believes has committed an infraction or an ordinance violation" Datzek v. State, 838 N.E.2d 1149, 1154 (Ind.Ct.App.2005), trans. denied (quoting Peete v. State, 678 N.E.2d 415, 419 (Ind.Ct.App.1997), trans. denied ). | 1 | 2009–2009 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.