burden to establish claim in Kansas

15 Kansas opinions name it 2 courts 1968–2024 4 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Kansas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

Case	Followed	Cited
Roles v. the Boeing Co.green kanctapp · 2010 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2020–2020 1 sentence 2020K.S.A. 77-621(a)(1); see Roles v. The Boeing Co., 43 Kan.	1	1
Carmona v. Stategreen texcrimapp · 1997 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2019–2019 1 sentence 2019Kan. 2000) (party asserting waiver of work-product immunity, rather than the party asserting *1335 the work-product protection, should have the burden to establish waiver); Carmona v. State , 941 S.W.2d 949 , 953 (Tex. Crim.	1	1
State v. Phamgreen kan · 1984 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 2003–2003 2 sentences 2003See State v. Pham, 234 Kan. 649, 653 , 675 P.2d 848 (1984). 2003See State v. Pham, 234 Kan. 649, 653 , 675 P.2d 848 (1984).	1	1
Jacobs v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. of Kansas, Inc.green kan · 1966 · cited in 1 Kansas opinions naming this issue, 1968–1968 2 sentences 1968(Hanna v. Edward Gray Corporation, supra.; see also Jacobs v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 196 Kan. 613, 616 , 412 P. 2d 986 .) The district court in its order denying an award stated: “The burden of proof, though relatively light, rests on the claimant to prove the death of the workman was caused by an accident which arose out of and in the course of his employment. 1968(Hanna v. Edward Gray Corporation, supra.; see also Jacobs v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co., 196 Kan. 613, 616 , 412 P. 2d 986 .) The district court in its order denying an award stated: “The burden of proof, though relatively light, rests on the claimant to prove the death of the workman was caused by an accident which arose out of and in the course of his employment.	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Kansas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (15)

Case	Cited	Years
Soto v. City of Bonner Springs green kan · 2010 2 sentences 2024Under the KTCA liability is the rule and immunity is an exception; thus, the "governmental entity bears the burden to establish immunity under the exceptions of the 13 Kansas Tort Claims Act." Soto, 291 Kan. 73 , Syl. ¶ 5. 2019But we have recently held that a "governmental entity bears the burden to establish immunity under the exceptions of the Kansas Tort Claims Act." Soto, 291 Kan. 73 , Syl. ¶ 5.	3	2019–2024
Skahan v. Powell green kanctapp · 1982 2 sentences 1984Hoover Equipment Co. v. Smith, 198 Kan. 127, 134 , 422 P.2d 914 (1967); Skahan v. Powell, 8 Kan. 1983Hoover Equipment Co. v. Smith, 198 Kan. 127, 134 , 422 P.2d 914 (1967); Skahan v. Powell, 8 Kan.	2	1983–1984
Hoover Equipment Co. v. Smith green kan · 1967 2 sentences 1984Hoover Equipment Co. v. Smith, 198 Kan. 127, 134 , 422 P.2d 914 (1967); Skahan v. Powell, 8 Kan. 1984Hoover Equipment Co. v. Smith, 198 Kan. 127, 134 , 422 P.2d 914 (1967); Skahan v. Powell, 8 Kan.	2	1983–1984
Patterson v. Cowley County, Kansas green kan · 2018 2 sentences 2022Patterson v. Cowley County, 307 Kan. 616, 630 , 413 P.3d 432 (2018). 2022Patterson v. Cowley County, 307 Kan. 616, 630 , 413 P.3d 432 (2018).	1	2022–2022
State v. Neighbors green kan · 2014 1 sentence 2021Neighbors, 299 Kan. at 240 .	1	2021–2021
State v. White green kan · 2003 1 sentence 2006State v. Davis, 277 Kan. 231, 239 , 83 P.3d 182 (2004.) The party claiming error in the denial of severance “has the burden to establish the claim and must establish that there was clearly an abuse of discretion.” White, 275 Kan. at 589 .	1	2006–2006
State v. Davis green kan · 2004 2 sentences 2006State v. Davis, 277 Kan. 231, 239 , 83 P.3d 182 (2004.) The party claiming error in the denial of severance “has the burden to establish the claim and must establish that there was clearly an abuse of discretion.” White, 275 Kan. at 589 . 2006State v. Davis, 277 Kan. 231, 239 , 83 P.3d 182 (2004.) The party claiming error in the denial of severance “has the burden to establish the claim and must establish that there was clearly an abuse of discretion.” White, 275 Kan. at 589 .	1	2006–2006
State v. Williams green kan · 1983 2 sentences 1984State v. Williams, 234 Kan. 233, 238 , 670 P.2d 1348 (1983); State v. Wright, 4 Kan. 1984State v. Williams, 234 Kan. 233, 238 , 670 P.2d 1348 (1983); State v. Wright, 4 Kan.	1	1984–1984
State v. Wright green kanctapp · 1979 1 sentence 1984State v. Williams, 234 Kan. 233, 238 , 670 P.2d 1348 (1983); State v. Wright, 4 Kan.	1	1984–1984
State v. Pettay green kan · 1975 2 sentences 1977(State v. Robertson, 221 Kan. 409, 411 , 559 P. 2d 810 ; State v. Lee, 221 Kan. 109 , 558 P. 2d 1096 ; and State v. Pettay, 216 Kan. 555 , 532 P. 2d 1289 .) All the witnesses testified to a brutal and unprovoked assault, to the defendant’s kicking and stomping Dusin, and to the defendant’s resumption of the attack when a helpless Dusin attempted to flee. 1977(State v. Robertson, 221 Kan. 409, 411 , 559 P. 2d 810 ; State v. Lee, 221 Kan. 109 , 558 P. 2d 1096 ; and State v. Pettay, 216 Kan. 555 , 532 P. 2d 1289 .) All the witnesses testified to a brutal and unprovoked assault, to the defendant’s kicking and stomping Dusin, and to the defendant’s resumption of the attack when a helpless Dusin attempted to flee.	1	1977–1977
State v. Lee green kan · 1976 2 sentences 1977(State v. Robertson, 221 Kan. 409, 411 , 559 P. 2d 810 ; State v. Lee, 221 Kan. 109 , 558 P. 2d 1096 ; and State v. Pettay, 216 Kan. 555 , 532 P. 2d 1289 .) All the witnesses testified to a brutal and unprovoked assault, to the defendant’s kicking and stomping Dusin, and to the defendant’s resumption of the attack when a helpless Dusin attempted to flee. 1977(State v. Robertson, 221 Kan. 409, 411 , 559 P. 2d 810 ; State v. Lee, 221 Kan. 109 , 558 P. 2d 1096 ; and State v. Pettay, 216 Kan. 555 , 532 P. 2d 1289 .) All the witnesses testified to a brutal and unprovoked assault, to the defendant’s kicking and stomping Dusin, and to the defendant’s resumption of the attack when a helpless Dusin attempted to flee.	1	1977–1977
State v. Robertson green kan · 1977 2 sentences 1977(State v. Robertson, 221 Kan. 409, 411 , 559 P. 2d 810 ; State v. Lee, 221 Kan. 109 , 558 P. 2d 1096 ; and State v. Pettay, 216 Kan. 555 , 532 P. 2d 1289 .) All the witnesses testified to a brutal and unprovoked assault, to the defendant’s kicking and stomping Dusin, and to the defendant’s resumption of the attack when a helpless Dusin attempted to flee. 1977(State v. Robertson, 221 Kan. 409, 411 , 559 P. 2d 810 ; State v. Lee, 221 Kan. 109 , 558 P. 2d 1096 ; and State v. Pettay, 216 Kan. 555 , 532 P. 2d 1289 .) All the witnesses testified to a brutal and unprovoked assault, to the defendant’s kicking and stomping Dusin, and to the defendant’s resumption of the attack when a helpless Dusin attempted to flee.	1	1977–1977
Bender v. Salina Roofing Co. neutral kan · 1956 2 sentences 1969The claimant in a workmen's compensation case has the burden to establish his claim. ( Bender v. Salina Roofing Co., 179 Kan. 415 , 295 P.2d 662 ; Ratzlaff v. Friedeman Service Store, 195 Kan. 548 , 407 P.2d 513 ; Meyers v. Consolidated Printing & Stationery Co., 201 Kan. 806 , 443 P.2d 319 .) The extent and degree of disability is a necessary element of his claim. 1969The claimant in a workmen's compensation case has the burden to establish his claim. ( Bender v. Salina Roofing Co., 179 Kan. 415 , 295 P.2d 662 ; Ratzlaff v. Friedeman Service Store, 195 Kan. 548 , 407 P.2d 513 ; Meyers v. Consolidated Printing & Stationery Co., 201 Kan. 806 , 443 P.2d 319 .) The extent and degree of disability is a necessary element of his claim.	1	1969–1969
Ratzlaff v. Friedeman Service Store green kan · 1965 2 sentences 1969The claimant in a workmen's compensation case has the burden to establish his claim. ( Bender v. Salina Roofing Co., 179 Kan. 415 , 295 P.2d 662 ; Ratzlaff v. Friedeman Service Store, 195 Kan. 548 , 407 P.2d 513 ; Meyers v. Consolidated Printing & Stationery Co., 201 Kan. 806 , 443 P.2d 319 .) The extent and degree of disability is a necessary element of his claim. 1969The claimant in a workmen's compensation case has the burden to establish his claim. ( Bender v. Salina Roofing Co., 179 Kan. 415 , 295 P.2d 662 ; Ratzlaff v. Friedeman Service Store, 195 Kan. 548 , 407 P.2d 513 ; Meyers v. Consolidated Printing & Stationery Co., 201 Kan. 806 , 443 P.2d 319 .) The extent and degree of disability is a necessary element of his claim.	1	1969–1969
Meyers v. Consolidated Printing & Stationery Co. green kan · 1968 2 sentences 1969The claimant in a workmen's compensation case has the burden to establish his claim. ( Bender v. Salina Roofing Co., 179 Kan. 415 , 295 P.2d 662 ; Ratzlaff v. Friedeman Service Store, 195 Kan. 548 , 407 P.2d 513 ; Meyers v. Consolidated Printing & Stationery Co., 201 Kan. 806 , 443 P.2d 319 .) The extent and degree of disability is a necessary element of his claim. 1969The claimant in a workmen's compensation case has the burden to establish his claim. ( Bender v. Salina Roofing Co., 179 Kan. 415 , 295 P.2d 662 ; Ratzlaff v. Friedeman Service Store, 195 Kan. 548 , 407 P.2d 513 ; Meyers v. Consolidated Printing & Stationery Co., 201 Kan. 806 , 443 P.2d 319 .) The extent and degree of disability is a necessary element of his claim.	1	1969–1969

Statutes the citing opinions construe

KS § K.S.A. § 22-3204 (4) KS § K.S.A. § 75-6104 (4) KS § K.S.A. § 21-3401 (3) KS § K.S.A. § 60-456 (3) KS § K.S.A. § 75-6103 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

TX 62 (1976–2026) IA 56 (1933–2025) CA 28 (2009–2025) PA 18 (1968–2025) OH 16 (1994–2021) KS 15 (1968–2024) IL 15 (1996–2025) MT 13 (2002–2024) FL 10 (1985–2015) GA 6 (2012–2022) CO 6 (2000–2024) MO 5 (1970–2010) ND 4 (2016–2024) AR 3 (1967–1988) LA 3 (1958–1982) AZ 3 (2017–2020) MI 2 (2007–2021) NJ 2 (1993–2021) MD 2 (1989–2012) WA 2 (1998–2023) NV 2 (1990–2021) WI 2 (1986–2001) NC 2 (2018–2025) OR 2 (1990–2026) CT 2 (2001–2003) VT 2 (1990–2003)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check