62 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 1976–2026 11 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Texas Department of Transportation v. Jonesgreen2 sentences2010Texas Dep’t of Trans. v. Jones, 8 S.W.3d 636, 638 (Tex. 1999). 2010Texas Dep’t of Trans. v. Jones, 8 S.W.3d 636, 638 (Tex.1999). | 8 | 11 |
Baylor College of Medicine v. Camberggreen2 sentences2025Although appellee does not argue that the Partnership’s request to enforce the email exchanges was insufficiently supported by pleadings and proof, as appellant, the Partnership “bears the burden to establish error in the trial court’s judgment.” Baylor Coll. of Med., 247 S.W.3d at 349 . 2013We will not make appellant’s arguments for her.”); see also Baylor Coll. of Med. v. Camberg, 247 S.W.3d 342, 346 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, pet. denied) (“[T]he appellant bears the burden to establish error in the trial court’s judgment.”). | 5 | 6 |
Spears v. Fourth Court of Appealsgreen2 sentences2023See Spears, 797 S.W.2d at 656 . 2015“When a movant seeks disqualification based on an alleged violation of a disciplinary rule, he must carry the burden to establish the violation with specificity.” Id. (citing Spears v. Fourth 6 Court of Appeals, 797 S.W.2d 654, 656 (Tex. 1990). | 4 | 4 |
Zale Corporation v. Rosenbaumgreen2 sentences2003Zale Corp. v. Rosenbaum , 520 S.W.2d 889, 891 (Tex. 1975); Villages of Greenbriar , 874 S.W.2d at 262 . 2003Zale Corp. v. Rosenbaum, 520 S.W.2d 889, 891 (Tex.1975); Villages of Greenbriar, 874 S.W.2d at 262 . | 4 | 4 |
Jordan v. Honorable Court of Appeals for the Fourth Supreme Judicial Districtgreen2 sentences2001See Jordan v. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Supreme Judicial District, 701 S.W.2d 644, 648-49 (Tex.1985) (holding that a party claiming a privilege has the burden to establish that privilege and, if the matter for which a privilege is sought has been disclosed to a third party, that no waiver took place). [[Image here]] We hold that if documents are privileged or confidential under the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure or Texas Rules of Evidence, they are within a “category of information [that] is expressly made confidential under other law” within the meaning of section 552.022 of the Public 2001See Jordan v. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Supreme Judicial District, 701 S.W.2d 644, 648-49 (Tex.1985) (holding that a party claiming a privilege has the burden to establish that privilege and, if the matter for which a privilege is sought has been disclosed to a third party, that no waiver took place). * * * * * We hold that if documents are privileged or confidential under the Texas Rules of Civil Procedure or Texas Rules of Evidence, they are within a "category of information [that] is expressly made confidential under other law" within the meaning of section 552.022 of the Public Infor | 4 | 4 |
Englander Co. v. Kennedygreen2 sentences2020Englander Co., Inc. v. Kennedy, 428 S.W.2d 806, 807 (Tex. 1968) (per 9 curiam); Baylor Coll. of Med. v. Camberg, 247 S.W.3d 342, 346 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, pet. denied). 2011Englander Co. v. Kennedy, 428 S.W.2d 806, 807 (Tex. 1968) (per curiam); Baylor College of Medicine v. Camberg, 247 S.W.3d 342, 346 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2008, pet. denied). | 3 | 3 |
Kappus v. Kappusgreen2 sentences2024See Kappus v. Kappus, 284 S.W.3d 831, 835 (Tex. 2009) (referring to Section 404.0035’s predecessor statute in former Probate Code). 2023See Kappus v. Kappus, 284 S.W.3d 831, 835 (Tex. 2009) (referring to Section 404.0035’s predecessor statute in former Probate Code). | 2 | 2 |
Jackson v. Stategreen2 sentences2019Jackson v. State, 973 S.W.2d 954, 956 (Tex. Crim. 2019Jackson v. State, 973 S.W.2d 954, 956 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Goodspeed v. Streetgreen2 sentences2011Id. (citing Goodspeed v. Street, 747 S.W.2d 526, 530 (Tex. App.–Fort Worth 1988, orig. proceeding)). 1997See Goodspeed v. Street, 747 S.W.2d 526, 530 (Tex.App.—Fort Worth 1988, orig. proceeding). | 2 | 2 |
Hellman v. Mateogreen2 sentences1992See Hellman v. Mateo , 772 S.W.2d 64, 66 (Tex. 1989). 1992See Heilman v. Mateo, 772 S.W.2d 64, 66 (Tex.1989). | 2 | 2 |
Villages of Greenbriar v. Torresgreen2 sentences2003Zale Corp. v. Rosenbaum , 520 S.W.2d 889, 891 (Tex. 1975); Villages of Greenbriar , 874 S.W.2d at 262 . 1996Villages of Greenbriar v. Torres, 874 S.W.2d 259, 261-62 (Tex.App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, writ denied). *701 When summary judgment is sought on the ground of limitations, the movant bears the burden to establish the bar of limitations. | 1 | 3 |
Dynegy Inc. v. Terry W. Yates, Individually, and Terry W. Yates, P.C.green2 sentences2026See id. 2020Id. | 1 | 2 |
Memorial Hospital-The Woodlands v. McCowngreen2 sentences2015Occurrence Reports are not created in the to prove the privilege applies to the information sought. regular course of business and are not part of a patient’s See id. 2013See id. | 1 | 2 |
City of San Antonio v. Hartmangreen1 sentence2025So, when the emergency-response exception is in play, “[t]he plaintiff bears the burden of negating [the emergency-response exception’s] applicability.” Maspero, 640 S.W.3d at 529; see City of San Antonio v. Hartman, 201 S.W.3d 667, 672 (Tex. 2006). | 1 | 1 |
Exxon Mobil Corporation, Whm Custom Services, Inc., and Disa, Inc. v. Gilberto Rinconesgreen1 sentence2024Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Rincones, 520 S.W.3d 572, 593 (Tex. 2017). | 1 | 1 |
Richard Rosen, Inc. v. Mendivilgreen1 sentence2022See Richard Rosen, Inc. v. Mendivil, 225 S.W.3d 181 , 192 (Tex.App.--El Paso 2005, pet. denied), citing Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co., 767 S.W.2d 686, 690 (Tex. 1989). | 1 | 1 |
Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co.green1 sentence2022See Richard Rosen, Inc. v. Mendivil, 225 S.W.3d 181 , 192 (Tex.App.--El Paso 2005, pet. denied), citing Sterner v. Marathon Oil Co., 767 S.W.2d 686, 690 (Tex. 1989). | 1 | 1 |
In Re Atlas Tubular, L.P.green1 sentence2018See id. § 82.003(a); In re Atlas Tubular, LP, 296 S.W.3d 363, 365 (Tex. App.—Corpus Christi 2009, orig. proceeding); see also Howard v. Wal-Mart, No. 10-09- 00246-CV, 2010 WL 3784918 , at *3–4 (Tex. App.—Waco Sept. 29, 2010, no pet.) (mem. op.) (holding that the trial court properly granted seller’s no-evidence summary judgment motion where plaintiff presented no evidence regarding the application of a statutory exception); Dennis v. Giles Grp., Inc., No. 04-07-00280-CV, 2008 WL 183062 , at *6 (Tex. App.—San Antonio Jan. 23, 2008, no pet.) (mem. op.) (reviewing whether plaintiff 2 Section 82.0 | 1 | 1 |
In Re State Farm Lloyds, Inc.green1 sentence2017In re State Farm Lloyds, 170 S.W.3d 629, 634 (Tex. App.—El Paso 2005, orig. proceeding). | 1 | 1 |
Lunsford Consulting Group, Inc. v. Crescent Real Estate Funding VIII, L.P.green1 sentence2016See Lunsford Consulting Grp., Inc. v. Crescent Real Estate Funding VIII, L.P., 77 S.W.3d 473 , 476–77 (Tex. App.―Houston [1st Dist.] 2002, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
in Re Texas Windstorm Insurance Associationgreen2 sentences2015See In re Tex. Windstorm, 417 S.W.3d at 129 (“When a movant seeks disqualification based on an alleged violation of a disciplinary rule, he must carry the burden to establish the violation with specificity.”). 2015Accordingly, nothing in the mandamus record demonstrates the adversity required to support the application of Rule 1.09.4 See id. at 130 (adversity is a “fundamental precondition” to application of Rule 1.09). 3 In its response to the petition for mandamus, the City suggests for the first time that Ready consulted Ogg as a result of Trimmer-Davis’s complaints of discrimination and retaliation. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Bank of America, N.A.green1 sentence2012See In re Bank of America, N.A., 278 S.W.3d 342, 346 (Tex.2009). | 1 | 1 |
City of Laredo v. Schublegreen1 sentence2009See City of Laredo v. Schuble, 943 S.W.2d 124, 126 (Tex. App.—San Antonio 1997, orig. proceeding); see also Ganesan v. Forrest, No. 10-05- 00361-CV, 2006 Tex. App. LEXIS 425 , *2 (Tex. App.—Waco Jan. 18, 2006, pet. denied). | 1 | 1 |
| Trevino v. Houston Orthopedic Centergreen | 1 | 1 |
| Sammons v. Eldergreen | 1 | 1 |
Coleman v. Stategreen1 sentence2008Englander Co., 428 S.W.2d at 807 ; Trevino, 881 S.W.2d at 344. | 1 | 1 |
| General Services Commission v. Little-Tex Insulation Co.green | 1 | 1 |
| In Re Estate of Canalesgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Matter of Estate of Minnickgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Montgomery v. Kennedygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Hammonds v. Calhoun Distributing Co., Inc.green | 1 | 1 |
| Bledsoe v. Yarboroughgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Arkansas Louisiana Gas Company v. Warrengreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In re State Farm Lloyds
green
1 sentence2024In re State Farm Lloyds, 514 S.W.3d at 792 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Smith, Al Letroy
green
1 sentence2022In considering an unreasonable delay, “courts should consider among other things, the length of applicant’s delay in requesting equitable relief, the reasons for the delay, and the degree and type of prejudice borne by the State resulting from applicant’s delay.” Ex parte Smith, 444 S.W.3d at 666-67 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Henry v. Cash Biz, LP
green
1 sentence2022Henry, 551 S.W.3d at 116 . a. | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Mann Frankfort Stein & Lipp Advisors, Inc. v. Fielding
green
1 sentence2015Id. –3– A defendant moving for summary judgment on the affirmative defense of limitations has the burden to establish that defense conclusively. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
National Medical Enterprises, Inc. v. Godbey
green
1 sentence2015“When a movant seeks disqualification based on an alleged violation of a disciplinary rule, he must carry the burden to establish the violation with specificity.” Id. (citing Spears v. Fourth 6 Court of Appeals, 797 S.W.2d 654, 656 (Tex. 1990). | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Walker v. Packer
green
1 sentence2011Id. (citing Goodspeed v. Street, 747 S.W.2d 526, 530 (Tex. App.–Fort Worth 1988, orig. proceeding)). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
| Peeples v. Honorable Fourth Supreme Judicial District green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| Daniel John Maglio v. Arnold R. Jago, Superintendent green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Mobile, Inc. v. Cone green | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.