15 New York opinions name it 2 courts 1912–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by New York courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Dermatossian v. New York City Transit Authoritygreen2 sentences2002Auth., 67 NY2d 219, 226 ; Vaynberg v Provident Operating Corp., 269 AD2d 442 ; Feuer v HASC Summer Program, 247 AD2d 429 ). 1989Auth., 67 NY2d 219, 226-228; cf., Crosby v Stone, 137 AD2d 785 ). | 1 | 2 |
Feblot v. New York Times Co.green1 sentence2018Inc. , 149 AD3d 74, 77-78 [1st Dept 2017]; Ianotta v Tishman Speyer Props., Inc., 46 AD3d 297 , 298—299 [1st Dept 2007]; compare Feblot v New York Times Co. , 32 NY2d 486, 496 [1973]). | 1 | 1 |
Barkley v. Plaza Realty Investors Inc.green1 sentence2018Inc. , 149 AD3d 74, 77-78 [1st Dept 2017]; Ianotta v Tishman Speyer Props., Inc., 46 AD3d 297 , 298—299 [1st Dept 2007]; compare Feblot v New York Times Co. , 32 NY2d 486, 496 [1973]). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Alexandergreen1 sentence2015The doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is applicable here because the accident was the kind that does not occur in the absence of negligence (see Hutchings v Yuter, 108 AD3d 416, 417 [1st Dept 2013]). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Craiggreen1 sentence2012Nor can we agree with plaintiff that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is applicable here, given the possibility that plaintiffs fall was caused by her own misstep (see Cortes v Central El., Inc., 45 AD3d 323, 324 [2007]). | 1 | 1 |
Moore v. Ortolanogreen1 sentence2011That doctrine is inapplicable to out-of-possession landlords, such as defendants, who do not exercise exclusive control (see Moore v Ortolano, 78 AD3d 1652, 1653 [2010]; Richardson v Simone, 275 AD2d at 578 ; Pulley v McNeal, 240 AD2d at 914 ). | 1 | 1 |
Robinson v. . Consolidated Gas Co.green1 sentence1912Robinson v. Consolidated Gas Co., 194 N. Y. 37, 40, 41 ; Schlappendorf v. American Ry. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in New York. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Allen v. City of New York
green
2 sentences2014Barnabas Hosp., 52 AD3d 286 [1st Dept 2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 705 [2008]). 2014Barnabas Hosp., 52 AD3d 286 [1st Dept 2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 705 [2008]). | 2 | 2014–2014 |
Jacobs v. Madison Plastic Surgery, P.C.
green
2 sentences2014Nor did plaintiff establish that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is applicable to this case (see Jacobs v Madison Plastic Surgery, P.C., 106 AD3d 530 [1st Dept 2013]; Johnson v St. 2014Nor did plaintiff establish that the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is applicable to this case (see Jacobs v Madison Plastic Surgery, P.C., 106 AD3d 530 [1st Dept 2013]; Johnson v St. | 2 | 2014–2014 |
Johnson v. St. Barnabas Hospital
green
2 sentences2014Barnabas Hosp., 52 AD3d 286 [1st Dept 2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 705 [2008]). 2014Barnabas Hosp., 52 AD3d 286 [1st Dept 2008], lv denied 11 NY3d 705 [2008]). | 2 | 2014–2014 |
O'Connor v. O'Connor
neutral
1 sentence2020Corp. , 279 AD2d 371 ; Murphy v Waldbaum, Inc. , 228 AD2d 156 ). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
People v. Davis
neutral
1 sentence2020Corp. , 279 AD2d 371 ; Murphy v Waldbaum, Inc. , 228 AD2d 156 ). | 1 | 2020–2020 |
Jackson v. New York City Housing Authority
green
1 sentence2018Inc. , 149 AD3d 74, 77-78 [1st Dept 2017]; Ianotta v Tishman Speyer Props., Inc., 46 AD3d 297 , 298—299 [1st Dept 2007]; compare Feblot v New York Times Co. , 32 NY2d 486, 496 [1973]). | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Pulley v. McNeal
green
1 sentence2011That doctrine is inapplicable to out-of-possession landlords, such as defendants, who do not exercise exclusive control (see Moore v Ortolano, 78 AD3d 1652, 1653 [2010]; Richardson v Simone, 275 AD2d at 578 ; Pulley v McNeal, 240 AD2d at 914 ). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Richardson v. Simone
green
1 sentence2011That doctrine is inapplicable to out-of-possession landlords, such as defendants, who do not exercise exclusive control (see Moore v Ortolano, 78 AD3d 1652, 1653 [2010]; Richardson v Simone, 275 AD2d at 578 ; Pulley v McNeal, 240 AD2d at 914 ). | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Gardner v. Wider
green
1 sentence2007Significantly, while plaintiffs have submitted an expert’s affirmation in support of their cross motion for summary judgment, the expert fails to mention anything about the lack of informed consent claim or to identify any qualitative insufficiency of the information provided to Mrs. Andrews (see generally Gardner v Wider, 32 AD3d 728 [2006]). | 1 | 2007–2007 |
Feuer v. HASC Summer Program, Inc.
green
1 sentence2002Auth., 67 NY2d 219, 226 ; Vaynberg v Provident Operating Corp., 269 AD2d 442 ; Feuer v HASC Summer Program, 247 AD2d 429 ). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Tivoli v. Expedite Mediation Arbitration Services, Inc.
neutral
1 sentence2002Auth., 67 NY2d 219, 226 ; Vaynberg v Provident Operating Corp., 269 AD2d 442 ; Feuer v HASC Summer Program, 247 AD2d 429 ). | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Finocchio v. Crest Hollow Club at Woodbury, Inc.
green
1 sentence1997Furthermore, there exist triable issues of fact as to whether the Tavern had exclusive control of the instrumentality in question and whether the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is applicable (see, e.g., Finocchio v Crest Hollow Club, 184 AD2d 491 ). | 1 | 1997–1997 |
Crosby v. Stone
green
1 sentence1989Auth., 67 NY2d 219, 226-228; cf., Crosby v Stone, 137 AD2d 785 ). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Butti v. Rollins
green
1 sentence1988The claimant failed to establish that the lifeguard stand was within the exclusive control of the defendant or that the fracturing of the stand’s footrest was not due to any voluntary action or contribution on the part of the claimant (see, Butti v Rollins, 133 AD2d 205 ). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Pipers v. Rosenow
green
1 sentence1986Generally, in medical malpractice cases, when an unexplained injury occurs in an area remote from the operation while the patient is anesthesized, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is applicable (see, Fogal v Genesee Hosp., supra; Pipers v Rosenow, 39 AD2d 240 ). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Fogal v. Genesee Hospital
green
1 sentence1986Generally, in medical malpractice cases, when an unexplained injury occurs in an area remote from the operation while the patient is anesthesized, the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is applicable (see, Fogal v Genesee Hosp., supra; Pipers v Rosenow, 39 AD2d 240 ). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Snelson v. Margaretville Hospital
neutral
1 sentence1978The order should be affirmed (see Snelson v Margaretville Hosp., 49 AD2d 991 .) Order affirmed, with costs. | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.