Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Colorado opinions name it 2 courts 1911–1995 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Colorado courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. | ||
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Colorado. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Zimmer Ex Rel. Zimmer v. Celebrities, Inc.
green
2 sentences1995Zimmer v. Celebrities, Inc., 44 Colo.App. 515 , 615 P.2d 76 (1980). 1995Zimmer v. Celebrities, Inc., 44 Colo.App. 515 , 615 P.2d 76 (1980). | 4 | 1981–1995 |
Zimmerman v. Franzen
green
2 sentences1971Zimmerman v. Franzen, 121 Colo. 574 , 220 P. 2d 344 . 1971Zimmerman v. Franzen, 121 Colo. 574 , 220 P. 2d 344 . | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Drake v. Lerner Shops of Colorado, Inc.
neutral
2 sentences1968Drake v. Lerner Shops, 145 Colo. 1 , 357 P.2d 624 ; Home Public Market v. Newrock, supra. In short, although the storekeeper must exercise reasonable care for the safety of the business visitor, he is not an insurer of the safety of such visitor; thus, the mere happening of an accident raises no presumption of negligence, except under those circumstances where the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is applicable. 1968Drake v. Lerner Shops, 145 Colo. 1 , 357 P.2d 624 ; Home Public Market v. Newrock, supra. In short, although the storekeeper must exercise reasonable care for the safety of the business visitor, he is not an insurer of the safety of such visitor; thus, the mere happening of an accident raises no presumption of negligence, except under those circumstances where the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is applicable. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Home Public Market v. Newrock
green
1 sentence1968Drake v. Lerner Shops, 145 Colo. 1 , 357 P.2d 624 ; Home Public Market v. Newrock, supra. In short, although the storekeeper must exercise reasonable care for the safety of the business visitor, he is not an insurer of the safety of such visitor; thus, the mere happening of an accident raises no presumption of negligence, except under those circumstances where the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is applicable. | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Melton v. Birmingham Railway Light & Power Co.
neutral
1 sentence1911L. & P. Co., 153 Ala. 95 ; Hutchinson on Carriers (2nd ed.), sec. 651; Denver Con. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Paul v. Salt Lake City Ry. Co.
neutral
1 sentence1911Co., 30 Utah 41 , the plaintiff was injured while alighting from a street car, due to the sudden starting of the car; the court, at page 49, said: “In case of a carrier and passenger, the rule of ‘res ipsa loquitur’ applies not only to eases of collision, derailing and upsetting’ of coaches, breaking of machinery, appliances, and the like, but also to the ..doing of acts by the servants operating the machinery, and to the management of instrumentalities over which the carrier has control, and for the management of which he is responsible.” That the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur is applicable w | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Gilmore v. Brooklyn Heights Railroad
neutral
1 sentence1911Co., 39 N. Y. | 1 | 1911–1911 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.