15 Tennessee opinions name it 4 courts 1995–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Tennessee courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Henderson v. SAIA, INC.green1 sentence2021See Henderson, 318 S.W.3d at 336 (noting that Rule 60 relief “is appropriate only in those relatively few instances that meet the criteria of the rule”). | 1 | 1 |
McCracken v. Brentwood United Methodist Churchgreen1 sentence2020Because of the strong interest in finality of judgments, a party seeking relief under Rule 60.02 “bears the burden of proving that [he or she] is entitled to relief by clear and convincing evidence.” Id. (citing McCracken v. Brentwood United Methodist Church, 958 S.W.2d 792, 795 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1997)). | 1 | 1 |
Workman v. Stategreen1 sentence2013The State, citing Workman v. State, 41 S.W.3d 100, 103 (Tenn. 2001), and State v. Ratliff, 71 S.W.3d 291 (Tenn. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Tennessee. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Toney v. Mueller Co.
green
2 sentences2020“Instead, relief is appropriate only in those relatively few instances that meet the criteria of the rule.” Id. 2012Relief under Rule 60.02 “is appropriate only in those relatively few instances that meet the criteria of the rule.” Id. | 12 | 1995–2020 |
Black v. Black
green
1 sentence2016Instead, relief is appropriate only in those relatively few instances that meet the criteria of the rule." Id. (citation omitted). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Ratliff
green
1 sentence2013The State, citing Workman v. State, 41 S.W.3d 100, 103 (Tenn. 2001), and State v. Ratliff, 71 S.W.3d 291 (Tenn. Crim. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.