criteria clause (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

criteria clause in Connecticut

5 Connecticut opinions name it 2 courts 1994–2004 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

CaseCitedYears
Thomas v. Washington Gas Light Co. green
scotus · 1980
2 sentences

2004Thomas v. Washington Gas Light Co., 448 U.S. 261 , 271 n.15, 100 S. Ct. 2647 , 65 L.

2004Thomas v. Washington Gas Light Co., 448 U.S. 261 , 271 n.15, 100 S. Ct. 2647 , 65 L.

41998–2004
Daddona v. Liberty Mobile Home Sales, Inc. green
conn · 1988
2 sentences

1994The criteria for the rule has been stated as: `(1) whether the practice, without necessarily having been previously considered unlawful, offends public policy as it has been established by statutes, the common law, or otherwise — whether, in other words, it is within at least the penumbra of some common law, statutory, or other established concept of unfairness; (2) whether it is immoral, unethical, oppressive, or unscrupulous; (3) whether it causes substantial injury to consumers [(competitors or other businessmen)].' Dadonna v. Liberty Mobile Home Sales; Inc., 209 Conn. 243 , 254 , 550 A.2d

1994The criteria for the rule has been stated as: `(1) whether the practice, without necessarily having been previously considered unlawful, offends public policy as it has been established by statutes, the common law, or otherwise — whether, in other words, it is within at least the penumbra of some common law, statutory, or other established concept of unfairness; (2) whether it is immoral, unethical, oppressive, or unscrupulous; (3) whether it causes substantial injury to consumers [(competitors or other businessmen)].' Dadonna v. Liberty Mobile Home Sales; Inc., 209 Conn. 243 , 254 , 550 A.2d

11994–1994

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-604 (3)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

PA 94 (1979–2026) CA 32 (1983–2025) IL 24 (1974–2016) TX 21 (1980–2015) TN 15 (1995–2021) FL 12 (1989–2024) MD 10 (1965–2026) OR 10 (1982–2021) NE 8 (1990–2020) WI 8 (1973–2024) LA 7 (1976–2012) NY 7 (1975–2009) CT 5 (1994–2004) RI 5 (1987–2009) MO 5 (1977–2007) SC 4 (1980–2023) WY 4 (1984–2001) VA 4 (2001–2024) IA 4 (1983–2019) ID 4 (1983–2002) UT 4 (1988–2024) MA 3 (1981–2014) MI 3 (1973–1974) NM 3 (1992–2012) NJ 3 (1993–2018) CO 3 (2009–2009) WA 3 (1986–2015) WV 2 (1990–2023) AL 2 (2011–2025) OH 2 (2003–2003) MS 2 (1988–1989) DC 2 (1995–2025)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check