15 Texas opinions name it 1 courts 2002–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Celestine v. Stategreen2 sentences2024A. Length of Delay The Barker test is triggered by a delay unreasonable enough to be “presumptively prejudicial.” Celestine v. State, 356 S.W.3d 502, 507 (Tex. App.— Houston [14th Dist.] 2009, no pet.). 2014A. Length of the Delay The Barker test is triggered by a delay unreasonable enough to be “presumptively prejudicial.” 8 Celestine v. State, 356 S.W.3d 502, 507 (Tex.App.Houston [14th Dist.] 2009, no pet.) Until there is some delay which is presumptively prejudicial, there is no necessity for inquiry into the other factors that go into the balance. | 2 | 2 |
Shaw v. Stategreen2 sentences2014Id. at 507 n. 3 (citing Barker, 407 U.S. at 530 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 ); see also Shaw v. State, 117 S.W.3d 883, 889 (Tex.Crim.App.2003). 2014Id. at 507 n. 3 (citing Barker, 407 U.S. at 530 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 ); see also Shaw v. State, 117 S.W.3d 883, 889 (Tex.Crim.App.2003). | 1 | 1 |
Joseph Avery Robinson v. John P. Whitley, Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiarygreen1 sentence2009Cantu, 253 S.W.3d at 280 -81 (citing Robinson v. Whitley, 2 F.3d 562, 570 (5th Cir. 1993)). 5 A. Length of Delay The Barker test is triggered by a delay that is unreasonable enough to be presumptively prejudicial. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Doggett v. United States
green
2 sentences2010Length of Delay The Barker test is triggered by a delay that is unreasonable enough to be “presumptively prejudicial.” Doggett v. United States, 505 U.S. 647 , 652 n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 2686 , 120 L.Ed.2d 520 (1992); Cantu, 253 S.W.3d at 281 . 2010Length of Delay The Barker test is triggered by a delay that is unreasonable enough to be “presumptively prejudicial.” Doggett v. United States, 505 U.S. 647 , 652 n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 2686 , 120 L.Ed.2d 520 (1992); Cantu, 253 S.W.3d at 281 . | 10 | 2002–2011 |
Cantu v. State
green
2 sentences2010Length of Delay The Barker test is triggered by a delay that is unreasonable enough to be “presumptively prejudicial.” Doggett v. United States, 505 U.S. 647 , 652 n.1 (1992); Cantu, 253 S.W.3d at 281 . 2010Length of Delay The Barker test is triggered by a delay that is unreasonable enough to be “presumptively prejudicial.” Doggett v. United States, 505 U.S. 647 , 652 n. 1, 112 S.Ct. 2686 , 120 L.Ed.2d 520 (1992); Cantu, 253 S.W.3d at 281 . | 7 | 2003–2011 |
Zamorano v. State
green
2 sentences2014Id. (a) Length of the Delay The Barker test is triggered by a delay that is unreasonable enough to be considered presumptively prejudicial. 2014Id. (a) Length of the Delay The Barker test is triggered by a delay that is unreasonable enough to be considered presumptively prejudicial. | 2 | 2014–2019 |
Barker v. Wingo
green
2 sentences2019Barker, 407 U.S. at 281 . 2014Id. at 507 n. 3 (citing Barker, 407 U.S. at 530 , 92 S.Ct. 2182 ); see also Shaw v. State, 117 S.W.3d 883, 889 (Tex.Crim.App.2003). | 2 | 2014–2019 |
State v. Davis
green
2 sentences2019Davis, 549 S.W.3d at 697 . “[T]he delay that can be tolerated for an ordinary street crime is considerably less than for a serious, complex conspiracy charge.” Id. (quoting Zamorano, 84 S.W.3d at 649 ). 2019Davis, 549 S.W.3d at 697 . “[T]he delay that can be tolerated for an ordinary street crime is considerably less than for a serious, complex conspiracy charge.” Id. (quoting Zamorano, 84 S.W.3d at 649 ). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.