14 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 1948–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
United States of America, Ex Rel. Edward T. Augustine v. Century Health Services, Inc.green2 sentences2007Augustine v. Century Health Services, Inc., 289 F.3d 409, 415 (6th Cir. 2002), which held that "a false implied certification may constitute a false or fraudulent claim even if the claim was not expressly false when it was filed." The State further relies on Pickens v. Kanawha River Towing, 916 F.Supp. 702 (S.D. 2007Augustine v. Century Health Services, Inc., 289 F.3d 409, 415 (6th Cir. 2002), which held that “a false implied certification may constitute a false or fraudulent claim even if the claim was not expressly false when it was filed.” The State further relies on Pickens v. Kanawha River Towing, 916 F. Supp. 702 (S.D. | 2 | 2 |
Benson v. Staffordgreen2 sentences2012Cf. Benson v. Stafford, 407 Ill. 2012Cf. Benson v. Stafford, 407 Ill. | 1 | 2 |
People v. Sharpegreen1 sentence2019Abdullah later filed a pro se “Supplemental Argument,” contending the imposition of consecutive 3 On October 6, 2005, this court filed People v. Sharpe, 216 Ill. 2d 481, 519 (2005), overruling Morgan, 203 Ill. 2d 470 , and reviving the firearm enhancements for attempted first degree murder. 4 Again, we note that although the record gave his name as Abdullah Muhammad, he represents himself as Muhammad Abdullah. -3- sentences deprived him of due process, as well as a “motion for ‘Additional § 2- 1401 Relief from Void Judgment,’ ” contending that a fraudulent instruction was given to the jury. ¶9 | 1 | 1 |
Diane C. CARTER v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginiagreen2 sentences1998App. 3d 411, 413-14 (1989)); the filing of a fraudulent claim for federal Social Security benefits (Commonwealth v. Morris, 394 Pa. Super. 185, 190-92 , 575 A.2d 582, 584-86 (1990)); the forging of federal income tax documents (State v. Radzvilowicz, 47 Conn. App. 1, 32-42 , 703 A.2d 767, 784-89 (1997)); the counterfeiting of United States’ currency (State v. McMurry, 184 Ariz. 447, 449 , 909 P.2d 1084, 1086-87 (App. 1995)); the unauthorized reception of cable television (Carter v. Commonwealth, 25 Va. App. 721, 725-26 , 492 S.E.2d 480, 481-82 (1997)); or the submission of false medicaid claim 1998App. 3d 411, 413-14 (1989)); the filing of a fraudulent claim for federal Social Security benefits (Commonwealth v. Morris, 394 Pa. Super. 185, 190-92 , 575 A.2d 582, 584-86 (1990)); the forging of federal income tax documents (State v. Radzvilowicz, 47 Conn. App. 1, 32-42 , 703 A.2d 767, 784-89 (1997)); the counterfeiting of United States’ currency (State v. McMurry, 184 Ariz. 447, 449 , 909 P.2d 1084, 1086-87 (App. 1995)); the unauthorized reception of cable television (Carter v. Commonwealth, 25 Va. App. 721, 725-26 , 492 S.E.2d 480, 481-82 (1997)); or the submission of false medicaid claim | 1 | 1 |
State v. Radzvilowiczgreen2 sentences1998App. 3d 411, 413-14 (1989)); the filing of a fraudulent claim for federal Social Security benefits (Commonwealth v. Morris, 394 Pa. Super. 185, 190-92 , 575 A.2d 582, 584-86 (1990)); the forging of federal income tax documents (State v. Radzvilowicz, 47 Conn. App. 1, 32-42 , 703 A.2d 767, 784-89 (1997)); the counterfeiting of United States’ currency (State v. McMurry, 184 Ariz. 447, 449 , 909 P.2d 1084, 1086-87 (App. 1995)); the unauthorized reception of cable television (Carter v. Commonwealth, 25 Va. App. 721, 725-26 , 492 S.E.2d 480, 481-82 (1997)); or the submission of false medicaid claim 1998App. 3d 411, 413-14 (1989)); the filing of a fraudulent claim for federal Social Security benefits (Commonwealth v. Morris, 394 Pa. Super. 185, 190-92 , 575 A.2d 582, 584-86 (1990)); the forging of federal income tax documents (State v. Radzvilowicz, 47 Conn. App. 1, 32-42 , 703 A.2d 767, 784-89 (1997)); the counterfeiting of United States’ currency (State v. McMurry, 184 Ariz. 447, 449 , 909 P.2d 1084, 1086-87 (App. 1995)); the unauthorized reception of cable television (Carter v. Commonwealth, 25 Va. App. 721, 725-26 , 492 S.E.2d 480, 481-82 (1997)); or the submission of false medicaid claim | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Morrisgreen2 sentences1998App. 3d 411, 413-14 (1989)); the filing of a fraudulent claim for federal Social Security benefits (Commonwealth v. Morris, 394 Pa. Super. 185, 190-92 , 575 A.2d 582, 584-86 (1990)); the forging of federal income tax documents (State v. Radzvilowicz, 47 Conn. App. 1, 32-42 , 703 A.2d 767, 784-89 (1997)); the counterfeiting of United States’ currency (State v. McMurry, 184 Ariz. 447, 449 , 909 P.2d 1084, 1086-87 (App. 1995)); the unauthorized reception of cable television (Carter v. Commonwealth, 25 Va. App. 721, 725-26 , 492 S.E.2d 480, 481-82 (1997)); or the submission of false medicaid claim 1998App. 3d 411, 413-14 (1989)); the filing of a fraudulent claim for federal Social Security benefits (Commonwealth v. Morris, 394 Pa. Super. 185, 190-92 , 575 A.2d 582, 584-86 (1990)); the forging of federal income tax documents (State v. Radzvilowicz, 47 Conn. App. 1, 32-42 , 703 A.2d 767, 784-89 (1997)); the counterfeiting of United States’ currency (State v. McMurry, 184 Ariz. 447, 449 , 909 P.2d 1084, 1086-87 (App. 1995)); the unauthorized reception of cable television (Carter v. Commonwealth, 25 Va. App. 721, 725-26 , 492 S.E.2d 480, 481-82 (1997)); or the submission of false medicaid claim | 1 | 1 |
State v. Quinngreen2 sentences1998App. 3d 411, 413-14 (1989)); the filing of a fraudulent claim for federal Social Security benefits (Commonwealth v. Morris, 394 Pa. Super. 185, 190-92 , 575 A.2d 582, 584-86 (1990)); the forging of federal income tax documents (State v. Radzvilowicz, 47 Conn. App. 1, 32-42 , 703 A.2d 767, 784-89 (1997)); the counterfeiting of United States’ currency (State v. McMurry, 184 Ariz. 447, 449 , 909 P.2d 1084, 1086-87 (App. 1995)); the unauthorized reception of cable television (Carter v. Commonwealth, 25 Va. App. 721, 725-26 , 492 S.E.2d 480, 481-82 (1997)); or the submission of false medicaid claim 1998App. 3d 411, 413-14 (1989)); the filing of a fraudulent claim for federal Social Security benefits (Commonwealth v. Morris, 394 Pa. Super. 185, 190-92 , 575 A.2d 582, 584-86 (1990)); the forging of federal income tax documents (State v. Radzvilowicz, 47 Conn. App. 1, 32-42 , 703 A.2d 767, 784-89 (1997)); the counterfeiting of United States’ currency (State v. McMurry, 184 Ariz. 447, 449 , 909 P.2d 1084, 1086-87 (App. 1995)); the unauthorized reception of cable television (Carter v. Commonwealth, 25 Va. App. 721, 725-26 , 492 S.E.2d 480, 481-82 (1997)); or the submission of false medicaid claim | 1 | 1 |
State v. McMurrygreen2 sentences1998App. 3d 411, 413-14 (1989)); the filing of a fraudulent claim for federal Social Security benefits (Commonwealth v. Morris, 394 Pa. Super. 185, 190-92 , 575 A.2d 582, 584-86 (1990)); the forging of federal income tax documents (State v. Radzvilowicz, 47 Conn. App. 1, 32-42 , 703 A.2d 767, 784-89 (1997)); the counterfeiting of United States’ currency (State v. McMurry, 184 Ariz. 447, 449 , 909 P.2d 1084, 1086-87 (App. 1995)); the unauthorized reception of cable television (Carter v. Commonwealth, 25 Va. App. 721, 725-26 , 492 S.E.2d 480, 481-82 (1997)); or the submission of false medicaid claim 1998App. 3d 411, 413-14 (1989)); the filing of a fraudulent claim for federal Social Security benefits (Commonwealth v. Morris, 394 Pa. Super. 185, 190-92 , 575 A.2d 582, 584-86 (1990)); the forging of federal income tax documents (State v. Radzvilowicz, 47 Conn. App. 1, 32-42 , 703 A.2d 767, 784-89 (1997)); the counterfeiting of United States’ currency (State v. McMurry, 184 Ariz. 447, 449 , 909 P.2d 1084, 1086-87 (App. 1995)); the unauthorized reception of cable television (Carter v. Commonwealth, 25 Va. App. 721, 725-26 , 492 S.E.2d 480, 481-82 (1997)); or the submission of false medicaid claim | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Scachitti v. UBS Financial Services
green
2 sentences2020The False Claims Act imposes civil liability upon “ ‘[a]ny person’ who, inter alia, ‘knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, to an officer or employee of the State *** a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval.’ ” Scachitti, 215 Ill. 2d at 504 (quoting 740 ILCS 175/3(a)(1) (West 2002)). 2020The False Claims Act imposes civil liability upon “ ‘[a]ny person’ who, inter alia, ‘knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, to an officer or employee of the State *** a false or fraudulent claim for payment or approval.’ ” Scachitti, 215 Ill. 2d at 504 (quoting 740 ILCS 175/3(a)(1) (West 2002)). | 2 | 2020–2020 |
Pickens v. Kanawha River Towing
green
2 sentences2007Augustine v. Century Health Services, Inc., 289 F.3d 409, 415 (6th Cir. 2002), which held that "a false implied certification may constitute a false or fraudulent claim even if the claim was not expressly false when it was filed." The State further relies on Pickens v. Kanawha River Towing, 916 F.Supp. 702 (S.D. 2007Augustine v. Century Health Services, Inc., 289 F.3d 409, 415 (6th Cir. 2002), which held that “a false implied certification may constitute a false or fraudulent claim even if the claim was not expressly false when it was filed.” The State further relies on Pickens v. Kanawha River Towing, 916 F. Supp. 702 (S.D. | 2 | 2007–2007 |
Chicago Housing Authority v. Stewart
green
1 sentence2025However, “[a]n action is not retaliatory if the landlord can prove a legitimate, non-retaliatory basis for the action; or the landlord began the action before the tenant engaged in the protected activity.” Id. ¶ 31 Defendants’ assertion that plaintiff’s eviction was based on a fraudulent claim of unpaid rent does not constitute an improper act of landlord retaliation. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Toby T. Watson v. Jennifer King-Vassel
green
1 sentence2023Id. at 713 . | 1 | 2023–2023 |
Township of Jubilee v. State of Illinois
green
1 sentence2019Township of Jubilee v. State of Illinois, 2011 IL 111447 , ¶ 36. ¶ 10 The False Claims Act provides that “any person” is liable to the State if that person knowingly presents a false or fraudulent claim to the State. 740 ILCS 175/3(a)(1) (West 2014). | 1 | 2019–2019 |
People v. Morgan
red
1 sentence2019Abdullah later filed a pro se “Supplemental Argument,” contending the imposition of consecutive 3 On October 6, 2005, this court filed People v. Sharpe, 216 Ill. 2d 481, 519 (2005), overruling Morgan, 203 Ill. 2d 470 , and reviving the firearm enhancements for attempted first degree murder. 4 Again, we note that although the record gave his name as Abdullah Muhammad, he represents himself as Muhammad Abdullah. -3- sentences deprived him of due process, as well as a “motion for ‘Additional § 2- 1401 Relief from Void Judgment,’ ” contending that a fraudulent instruction was given to the jury. ¶9 | 1 | 2019–2019 |
Scanlan v. Maryland Casualty Insurance
green
1 sentence1991Furthermore, the plaintiff in Scanlan also asserted that recent Illinois decisions “relax the physical-contact requirement whenever there is no likelihood that the insured has concocted the existence of a ‘phantom’ hit-and-run driver to obtain a fraudulent recovery.” (Scanlan, 203 Ill. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
People v. Polenik
green
2 sentences1981(People v. Polenick (1950), 407 Ill. 337 , 95 N.E.2d 414 .) A criminal defendant’s guilt or innocence is to be determined upon the evidence presented at trial, not upon the prosecutor’s attacks on defense counsel. 1981(People v. Polenick (1950), 407 Ill. 337 , 95 N.E.2d 414 .) A criminal defendant’s guilt or innocence is to be determined upon the evidence presented at trial, not upon the prosecutor’s attacks on defense counsel. | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Chandler v. White
neutral
1 sentence1948As pointed out in Chandler v. White, 84 Ill. 435 , the law does not require that the owner of land shall, within any particular period, commence proceedings in law or in equity, against a forger of title to his land, to vindicate his good title against the fraudulent claim of the forger or one claiming under him, but rather, he may bide his time and trust to the strength of his title. | 1 | 1948–1948 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.