14 Missouri opinions name it 1 courts 1977–2023 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Cosky v. Vandalia Bus Lines, Inc.green2 sentences2015Cf. Cosky v. Vandalia Bus Lines, Inc., 970 S.W.2d 861, 867 (Mo.App.S.D.1998) (point deemed abandoned where it "merely track[ed] the standard for granting summary judgment^ was] too general'to raise an issue on appeal[,]” and appellant's argument and reply brief did not cure the problem). . 2015Cf. Cosky v. Vandalia Bus Lines, Inc., 970 S.W.2d 861, 867 (Mo. App. S.D. 1998) (point deemed abandoned where it "merely track[ed] the standard for granting summary judgment[, was] too general to raise an issue on appeal[,]" and appellant's argument and reply brief did not cure the problem). 7 and Branson received a judgment in 2004 ("the 2004 judgment") that quieted title in its favor "'as to the western portion' of the peninsula[.]" Empire I, 344 S.W.3d at 847-48 . | 2 | 2 |
Murphy v. Carrongreen2 sentences2013Standard of Review Appellate review of a trial court’s judgment modifying a dissolution decree is guided by Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976), and thus limited to determining whether the judgment is supported by substantial evidence, is against the weight of the evidence, or erroneously declares or applies the law. 1978The husband concedes that our review is under the dictates of Rule 73.01 and Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30 (Mo. banc 1976). *234 On the question of substantial evidence to support the trial court’s award of the maintenance, it is sufficient to say that the wife, who had a record of ten years of employment in Missouri, terminated her employment and moved to Illinois where her husband was working in an attempt to help her save her marriage. | 1 | 2 |
Houston v. Cridergreen1 sentence2023Houston v. Crider, 317 S.W.3d 178, 186 (Mo. App. S.D. 2010). "[T]he trial court's judgment is presumed valid, and the burden is on the [Giovanellis] to demonstrate its incorrectness." McElvain v. Stokes, 623 S.W.3d 769 , 774 (Mo. App. W.D. 2021) (internal citation and quotation omitted). 6 Discussion Both of the Giovanellis' points challenge the trial court's finding that the Green Road was not a public road and would require a permit to use. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Yolegreen1 sentence2005Despite these briefing deficiencies, we may exercise our discretion to review the points of error if the deficiency “does not ... impede disposition on the merits.” State v. Yole, 136 S.W.3d 175, 178 (Mo.App. | 1 | 1 |
Boyer v. Grandview Manor Care Center, Inc.green1 sentence1999See Boyer v. Grandview Manor Care Center, 793 S.W.2d 346, 347-48 (Mo. banc 1990) (case remanded to consider defendants’ unresolved claims of error raised in their motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict); Noll v. Shelter Ins. | 1 | 1 |
Reynolds v. Briarwood Development Co.green1 sentence1987Reynolds v. Briarwood Development Co., 662 S.W.2d 905, 906 (Mo.App.1983). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Empire District Electric Co. v. Coverdell
green
1 sentence2015Cf. Cosky v. Vandalia Bus Lines, Inc., 970 S.W.2d 861, 867 (Mo. App. S.D. 1998) (point deemed abandoned where it "merely track[ed] the standard for granting summary judgment[, was] too general to raise an issue on appeal[,]" and appellant's argument and reply brief did not cure the problem). 7 and Branson received a judgment in 2004 ("the 2004 judgment") that quieted title in its favor "'as to the western portion' of the peninsula[.]" Empire I, 344 S.W.3d at 847-48 . | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Stanton v. Division of Employment Security
green
1 sentence2011Stanton, 321 S.W.3d at 488 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
City of Lee's Summit v. Browning
green
1 sentence1996City of Lee’s Summit, 722 S.W.2d at 116 . | 1 | 1996–1996 |
State v. England
neutral
1 sentence1988Gant v. State, 661 S.W.2d 675 (Mo.App.1983). | 1 | 1988–1988 |
Oldham's Farm Sausage Co. v. Salco, Inc.
green
1 sentence1986Oldham’s Farm Sausage Co. v. Saleo, Inc., supra. The judgment is affirmed. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Firestone v. Crown Center Redevelopment Corp.
green
1 sentence1986Overman and Massey, in addition to responding to each of the twenty-three points relied on by Bell, seek reinstatement of the jury verdict in their favor for Ten Million Dollars ($10,000,-000.00) as punitive damages under Rule 78.10 2 and Firestone v. Crown Center Re development Corp., 693 S.W.2d 99 (Mo. banc 1985). | 1 | 1986–1986 |
State v. Gibson
green
2 sentences1977State v. Gibson, 540 S.W.2d 952 (Mo.App.1976); State v. Richards, 536 S.W.2d 779 (Mo.App.1976); State v. Johnson, 536 S.W.2d 851 (Mo.App.1976). 1977State *537 v. Gibson, 540 S.W.2d 952 (Mo.App.1976); State v. Richards, 536 S.W.2d 779 (Mo.App. 1976); State v. Johnson, 536 S.W.2d 851 (Mo.App.1976). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
State v. Johnson
green
2 sentences1977State v. Gibson, 540 S.W.2d 952 (Mo.App.1976); State v. Richards, 536 S.W.2d 779 (Mo.App.1976); State v. Johnson, 536 S.W.2d 851 (Mo.App.1976). 1977State *537 v. Gibson, 540 S.W.2d 952 (Mo.App.1976); State v. Richards, 536 S.W.2d 779 (Mo.App. 1976); State v. Johnson, 536 S.W.2d 851 (Mo.App.1976). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
State v. Richards
green
2 sentences1977State v. Gibson, 540 S.W.2d 952 (Mo.App.1976); State v. Richards, 536 S.W.2d 779 (Mo.App.1976); State v. Johnson, 536 S.W.2d 851 (Mo.App.1976). 1977State *537 v. Gibson, 540 S.W.2d 952 (Mo.App.1976); State v. Richards, 536 S.W.2d 779 (Mo.App. 1976); State v. Johnson, 536 S.W.2d 851 (Mo.App.1976). | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.