deliberate violation (Pennsylvania) · Go Syfert
← Pennsylvania issues

deliberate violation in Pennsylvania

522 Pennsylvania opinions name it 5 courts 1909–2026 23 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (53)

CaseFollowedCited
Kentucky Fried Chicken of Altoona, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen
pacommwct · 1973 · cited in 122 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1974–2021
2 sentences

2015Section 704 of the Administrative Agency Law, 2 Pa.C.S. §704. 6 Initially, we note that, although the Law does not define the term willful misconduct, our courts have defined it as including: “(1) the wanton and willful disregard of the employer’s interests; (2) the deliberate violation of rules; (3) the disregard of standards of behavior which an employer can rightfully expect from its employee; or (4) negligence which manifests culpability, wrongful intent, evil design, or intentional and substantial disregard for the employer’s interests or the employee’s duties and obligations.” Guthrie v.

2002“Willful misconduct” has been defined by the Commonwealth Court as: “(1) the wanton and willful disregard of the employer’s interests;] “(2) the deliberate violation of rules[;] “(3) the disregard of standards of behavior which an employer can rightfully expect from its employe[e;] or “(4) negligence which manifests culpability, wrongful intent, evil design, or intentional and substantial disregard for the employer’s interests or the employee’s duties and obligations.” Kentucky Fried Chicken of Altoona Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 10 Pa. Commw. 90, 97 , 309 A.2d 165, 168-

53122
Frumento v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REV.green
pa · 1976 · cited in 44 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1977–2021
2 sentences

2006In Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 466 Pa. 81, 83-84 , 351 A.2d 631, 632 (1976), our supreme court defined “willful misconduct” as: an act of wanton or willful disregard of the employer’s interest, a deliberate violation of the employer’s rules, a disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has a right to expect of an employee, or negligence indicating an intentional disregard of the employer’s interest or of the employe's duties and obligations to the employer. 7 .

2006In Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 466 Pa. 81, 83-84 , 351 A.2d 631, 632 (1976), our supreme court defined “willful misconduct” as: an act of wanton or willful disregard of the employer’s interest, a deliberate violation of the employer’s rules, a disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has a right to expect of an employee, or negligence indicating an intentional disregard of the employer’s interest or of the employe's duties and obligations to the employer. 7 .

1844
Guthrie v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen
pacommwct · 1999 · cited in 19 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2007–2021
2 sentences

2016This Court has defined willful misconduct, in relevant part, as “the deliberate violation of [an employer’s] rules” or “the 7 disregard of standards of behavior which an employer can rightfully expect from his employee.” Guthrie v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 738 A.2d 518, 521 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1999).

2015Section 704 of the Administrative Agency Law, 2 Pa.C.S. §704. 6 Initially, we note that, although the Law does not define the term willful misconduct, our courts have defined it as including: “(1) the wanton and willful disregard of the employer’s interests; (2) the deliberate violation of rules; (3) the disregard of standards of behavior which an employer can rightfully expect from its employee; or (4) negligence which manifests culpability, wrongful intent, evil design, or intentional and substantial disregard for the employer’s interests or the employee’s duties and obligations.” Guthrie v.

1619
Harmer Unemployment Compensation Casegreen
pasuperct · 1965 · cited in 20 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1973–1988
2 sentences

1978In Harbutz v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 10 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 235, 237 , 309 A.2d 840, 841 (1973), we stated the following definition of willful conduct: '“. . . an act of wanton or willful disregard of the employer’s interest, a deliberate violation of the employer’s rules, a disregard of standards of behavior, ... or negligence in such degree or recurrence as to manifest culpability, wrongful intent, or evil design, or show an intentional and substantial disregard of the employer’s interest or of the employee’s duties and obligations to the employer.” ’ See: Harmer Unemplo

1978In Harbutz v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 10 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 235, 237 , 309 A.2d 840, 841 (1973), we stated the following definition of willful conduct: '“. . . an act of wanton or willful disregard of the employer’s interest, a deliberate violation of the employer’s rules, a disregard of standards of behavior, ... or negligence in such degree or recurrence as to manifest culpability, wrongful intent, or evil design, or show an intentional and substantial disregard of the employer’s interest or of the employee’s duties and obligations to the employer.” ’ See: Harmer Unemplo

1520
Moyer Unemployment Compensation Casegreen
pasuperct · 1955 · cited in 18 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1957–2021
2 sentences

1993This Court, in McLean v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 476 Pa. 617, 620 , 383 A.2d 533, 535 (1978) (quoting Moyer Unemployment Compensation Case, 177 Pa.Super. 72, 74 , 110 A.2d 753, 754 (1955)), defined “willful misconduct” as: ... an act of wanton or willful disregard of the employer’s interest, a deliberate violation of the employer’s rules, a disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has a right to expect of an employee, or negligence indicating an intentional disregard of the employer’s interest or of the employe’s duties and obligations to the employer.

1993The Law does not define willful misconduct; however, our Supreme Court in Frumento v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 466 Pa. 81 , 351 A.2d 631 (1976) adopted the definition of “willful misconduct”, as defined by the Superior Court, in Moyer Unemployment Compensation Case, 177 Pa.Superior Ct. 72, 110 A.2d 753 (1955), to “comprehend an act of wanton or willful disregard of the employer’s interest, a deliberate violation of the employer’s rules, a disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has a right to expect of an employee, or negligence indicating an intentional disrega

1118
Altemus v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen
pacommwct · 1996 · cited in 13 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2000–2020
2 sentences

2003Deliberate violation of a work rule or policy has long been found to be "willful misconduct." Altemus v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 681 A.2d 866 (Pa.Cmwlth.1996). [1] Act of December 5, 1936, Second Ex.Sess., P.L. (1937), as amended, 43 P.S. § 802(e).

2003Deliberate violation of a work rule or policy has long been found to be "willful misconduct.” Altemus v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 681 A.2d 866 (Pa.Cmwlth.1996). .

1113
Grieb v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen
pa · 2003 · cited in 10 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2003–2026
2 sentences

2026Grieb v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 827 A.2d 422, 425 (Pa. 2003).

2022Most importantly, Employer failed to appear at the hearing and 13 See Grieb v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 827 A.2d 422, 425 (Pa. 2003) (defining willful misconduct as (1) a wanton and willful disregard of an employer’s interests; (2) a deliberate violation of an employer’s rules; (3) a disregard of the standards of behavior that an employer can rightfully expect from an employee; or (4) negligence showing an intentional disregard of the employer’s interest or the employee’s duties and obligations).

910
Rossi v. Pennsylvania Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen
pa · 1996 · cited in 10 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1996–2015
2 sentences

2015Rossi v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 676 A.2d 194, 197 (Pa. 1996) (emphasis added).

2014Rossi v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 676 A.2d 194, 197 (Pa. 1996).

910
Oliver v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen
pacommwct · 2010 · cited in 9 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2012–2018
2 sentences

2018Oliver v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 5 A.3d 432, 438 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2010) (en banc).

2018Bd. of Review, 5 A.3d 432, 438 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2010) (holding that “the Board is the ultimate factfinding body empowered to resolve conflicts in evidence, to determine the credibility of witnesses, and to determine the weight to be accorded evidence.”). 2 Section 402(e) provides, in pertinent part, that an employee shall be ineligible for compensation for any week “[i]n which [her] unemployment is due to his discharge or temporary suspension from work for willful misconduct connected with [her] work . . . .” The term “willful misconduct” has been defined to include: (1) the deliberate violation o

99
Serban v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen
pacommwct · 1977 · cited in 18 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1977–1986
2 sentences

1982The meaning of willful misconduct “has been judicially developed to encompass the wanton and willful disregard of an employer’s interest, a deliberate violation of rules, a disregard of expected behavior standards or negligence manifesting culpability, wrongful intent, evil design or intentional and substantial disregard of the employer’s interests or the employe’s duties and obligations.” Serban v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 29 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 147, 150 , 370 A.2d 755, 756 (1977).

1982The meaning of willful misconduct “has been judicially developed to encompass the wanton and willful disregard of an employer’s interest, a deliberate violation of rules, a disregard of expected behavior standards or negligence manifesting culpability, wrongful intent, evil design or intentional and substantial disregard of the employer’s interests or the employe’s duties and obligations.” Serban v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 29 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 147, 150 , 370 A.2d 755, 756 (1977).

718
Kelly v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen
pacommwct · 2000 · cited in 11 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2012–2020
2 sentences

2017“There are four categories of activity that can constitute willful misconduct: (1) the wanton or willful disregard of the employer’s interests; (2) the deliberate violation of the employer’s rules; (3) the disregard of the standards of behavior which an employer can rightfully expect from an employee; and (4) negligence demonstrating an intentional disregard of the employer’s interests or the employee’s duties and obligations to the employer.” Kelly, 747 A.2d at 439 . 5 Habitual or excessive tardiness can constitute willful misconduct which renders an employee ineligible for benefits under Sec

2017“There are four categories of activity that can constitute willful misconduct: (1) the wanton or willful disregard of the employer’s interests; (2) the deliberate violation of the employer’s rules; (3) the disregard of the standards of behavior which an employer can rightfully expect from an employee; and (4) negligence demonstrating an intentional disregard of the employer’s interests or the employee’s duties and obligations to the employer.” Kelly, 747 A.2d at 439 . 5 Habitual or excessive tardiness can constitute willful misconduct which renders an employee ineligible for benefits under Sec

611
Johns v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen
pacommwct · 2014 · cited in 8 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2015–2019
2 sentences

2019Johns v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 87 A.3d 1006, 1009 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2014).

2015Among other things, willful misconduct may include a deliberate violation of the 3 Our scope of review “is limited to determining whether the necessary findings of fact were supported by substantial evidence, whether errors of law were committed or whether constitutional rights were violated.” Johns v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 87 A.3d 1006 , 1009 n.2.

68
Lytle v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen
pacommwct · 1978 · cited in 7 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1978–2009
2 sentences

1978In Lytle v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 36 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 77, 80 , 387 A.2d 962, 963 (1978), we wrote: [T]he wanton and willful disregard of an employer’s interest, a deliberate violation of the employer’s rules, a disregard of expected standards of behavior, or negligence manifesting culpability, wrongful intent, evil design or an intentional disregard of the employer’s interest or the employee’s duties or obligations to the employer [constitute willful misconduct].

1978In Lytle v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 36 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 77, 80 , 387 A.2d 962, 963 (1978), we wrote: [T]he wanton and willful disregard of an employer’s interest, a deliberate violation of the employer’s rules, a disregard of expected standards of behavior, or negligence manifesting culpability, wrongful intent, evil design or an intentional disregard of the employer’s interest or the employee’s duties or obligations to the employer [constitute willful misconduct].

67
McLean v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen
pa · 1978 · cited in 10 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1981–2001
2 sentences

1996Selan, 495 Pa. at 343 , 433 A.2d at 1339 ; McLean, 476 Pa. at 619 , 383 A.2d at 535 . 4 *267 We have adopted the following definition of willful misconduct: an act of wanton or willful disregard of the employer’s interest, a deliberate violation of the employer’s rules, a disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has a right to expect of an employee, or negligence indicating an intentional disregard of the employer’s interest or of the employee’s duties and obligations to the employer.

1996Selan, 495 Pa. at 343 , 433 A.2d at 1339 ; McLean, 476 Pa. at 619 , 383 A.2d at 535 . 4 *267 We have adopted the following definition of willful misconduct: an act of wanton or willful disregard of the employer’s interest, a deliberate violation of the employer’s rules, a disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has a right to expect of an employee, or negligence indicating an intentional disregard of the employer’s interest or of the employee’s duties and obligations to the employer.

510
Harbutz v. Commonwealthgreen
pacommwct · 1973 · cited in 10 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1973–1982
2 sentences

1978In Harbutz v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 10 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 235, 237 , 309 A.2d 840, 841 (1973), we stated the following definition of willful conduct: '“. . . an act of wanton or willful disregard of the employer’s interest, a deliberate violation of the employer’s rules, a disregard of standards of behavior, ... or negligence in such degree or recurrence as to manifest culpability, wrongful intent, or evil design, or show an intentional and substantial disregard of the employer’s interest or of the employee’s duties and obligations to the employer.” ’ See: Harmer Unemplo

1978In Harbutz v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 10 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 235, 237 , 309 A.2d 840, 841 (1973), we stated the following definition of willful conduct: '“. . . an act of wanton or willful disregard of the employer’s interest, a deliberate violation of the employer’s rules, a disregard of standards of behavior, ... or negligence in such degree or recurrence as to manifest culpability, wrongful intent, or evil design, or show an intentional and substantial disregard of the employer’s interest or of the employee’s duties and obligations to the employer.” ’ See: Harmer Unemplo

510
Loder v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen
pacommwct · 1972 · cited in 8 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1975–1978
2 sentences

1976Willful misconduct has been defined to mean: “ [A] wanton or willful disregard of the employer’s interest, a deliberate violation of the employer’s rules, a disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has the right to expect of his employees, or negligence in such degree or recurrence as to manifest culpability, wrongful intent, or evil design, or show an intentional and substantial disregard of the employer’s interests or of the employee’s duties and ob *159 ligations to the employer.” Loder v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 6 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 484, 488 , 296 A.2d 297

1976Willful misconduct has been defined to mean: “ [A] wanton or willful disregard of the employer’s interest, a deliberate violation of the employer’s rules, a disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has the right to expect of his employees, or negligence in such degree or recurrence as to manifest culpability, wrongful intent, or evil design, or show an intentional and substantial disregard of the employer’s interests or of the employee’s duties and ob *159 ligations to the employer.” Loder v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 6 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 484, 488 , 296 A.2d 297

58
Navickas v. Unemployment Compensation Review Boardgreen
pa · 2001 · cited in 6 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2005–2018
2 sentences

2018Navickas v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 787 A.2d 284, 288 (Pa. 2001).

2017Navickas v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 787 A.2d 284, 288 (Pa. 2001).

56
Caterpillar, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen
pa · 1997 · cited in 11 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1999–2018
2 sentences

2018Caterpillar, 703 A.2d at 456 ; Scott, 36 A.3d at 647 .

2018Caterpillar, 703 A.2d at 456 ; Scott, 36 A.3d at 647 .

411
Scott v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen
pacommwct · 2012 · cited in 7 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2017–2018
2 sentences

2018Caterpillar, 703 A.2d at 456 ; Scott, 36 A.3d at 647 .

2018Caterpillar, 703 A.2d at 456 ; Scott, 36 A.3d at 647 .

47
Chapman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen
pacommwct · 2011 · cited in 6 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2017–2025
2 sentences

2025Chapman v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 20 A.3d 603, 606-07 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2011) (citations omitted).

2017The Law does not define willful misconduct; however, numerous decisions of this Court have defined the term as: (1) the wanton and willful disregard of the employer’s interests; (2) the deliberate violation of rules; (3) the disregard of standards of behavior that an employer can rightfully expect from his employee; or (4) negligence which manifests culpability, wrongful intent, evil design, or intentional and substantial disregard for the employer’s interests or the employee’s duties and obligations. 9 Chapman, 20 A.3d at 606-07 .

46
MacFarlane v. Commonwealthgreen
pacommwct · 1974 · cited in 6 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1974–1988
2 sentences

1976Although willful misconduct has not been defined by the legislature, we have defined it to mean: “an act of wanton or willful disregard of the employer’s interest, a deliberate violation of the employer’s rules, a disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has the right to expect of his employee, or negligence in such degree or recurrence as to manifest culpability, wrongful intent, or evil design, or show an intentional and substantial disregard of the employer’s interest or of the employee’s duties and obligations to the employer.” MacFarlane v. Unemployment Compensation Board of

1976Although willful misconduct has not been defined by the legislature, we have defined it to mean: “an act of wanton or willful disregard of the employer’s interest, a deliberate violation of the employer’s rules, a disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has the right to expect of his employee, or negligence in such degree or recurrence as to manifest culpability, wrongful intent, or evil design, or show an intentional and substantial disregard of the employer’s interest or of the employee’s duties and obligations to the employer.” MacFarlane v. Unemployment Compensation Board of

46
Philadelphia Parking Authority v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen
pacommwct · 2010 · cited in 5 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2012–2018
2 sentences

2018Philadelphia Parking Authority v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 1 A.3d 965, 969 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2010).

2016Philadelphia Parking Authority v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 1 A.3d 965 , 969 (Pa.Cmwlth.2010).

45
Chambers v. Commonwealthgreen
pacommwct · 1974 · cited in 4 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1975–1976
44
Myers v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen
pa · 1993 · cited in 10 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1995–2016
2 sentences

1995“Willful misconduct,” as defined by the Supreme Court in Myers v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 533 Pa. 373, 37 , 625 A.2d 622, 625 (1993), is: an act of wanton or willful disregard of the employer’s interest, a deliberate violation of the employer’s rules, a disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has a right to expect of an employee, or negligence indicating an intentional disregard of the employer’s interest or of the employe’s duties and obligations to the employer.

1995“Willful misconduct,” as defined by the Supreme Court in Myers v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 533 Pa. 373, 37 , 625 A.2d 622, 625 (1993), is: an act of wanton or willful disregard of the employer’s interest, a deliberate violation of the employer’s rules, a disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has a right to expect of an employee, or negligence indicating an intentional disregard of the employer’s interest or of the employe’s duties and obligations to the employer.

310
Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen
pacommwct · 1992 · cited in 6 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1993–1995
2 sentences

1995Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 146 Pa.Commonwealth Ct. 648, 606 A.2d 955 (1992).

1995Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 146 Pa.Cmwlth. 648 , 606 A.2d 955 (1992).

36
Nyzio v. Lee Tire & Rubber Co.green
pacommwct · 1976 · cited in 4 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1978–1980
34
Waverly Heights, Ltd. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen
pacommwct · 2017 · cited in 3 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2025–2026
33
Temple Univ. v. UNEMPLOYMENT COMP. BD.green
pa · 2001 · cited in 3 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2004–2022
33
Adams v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen
pacommwct · 2012 · cited in 3 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2013–2018
33
Davis Unemployment Compensation Casegreen
pasuperct · 1958 · cited in 3 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1976–1986
33
Unemployment Compensation Board of Review of the Commonwealth v. Waltongreen
pacommwct · 1975 · cited in 6 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1976–1980
2 sentences

1980Although the phrase “willful misconduct” is not defined in the statute, our Court has consistently interpreted willful misconduct as ‘... an act of wanton or wilful disregard of the employer’s interest, a deliberate violation of the employer’s rules, a disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has the right to expect of his employe or negligence in such degree or recurrence as to manifest culpability, wrongful intent, or evil design, or show an intentional and substantial disregard of the employer’s interest or the employe’s duties and obligations to the employer.’ (Emphasis delete

1980Although the phrase “willful misconduct” is not defined in the statute, our Court has consistently interpreted willful misconduct as ‘... an act of wanton or wilful disregard of the employer’s interest, a deliberate violation of the employer’s rules, a disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has the right to expect of his employe or negligence in such degree or recurrence as to manifest culpability, wrongful intent, or evil design, or show an intentional and substantial disregard of the employer’s interest or the employe’s duties and obligations to the employer.’ (Emphasis delete

26
Giglio v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REVIEWgreen
pacommwct · 1989 · cited in 5 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1990–1994
2 sentences

1990On appeal to this court, 2 claimant raises two issues: (1) whether claimant committed willful misconduct; and (2) whether the Board incorrectly applied section 402(e) instead of section 3 of the Law. 3 As to the first issue, “willful misconduct” has been defined as “a wanton and willful disregard of an employer’s interests, a deliberate violation of an employer’s rules, a disregard of the standards of behavior which an employer can rightfully expect of an employee, or negligence manifesting culpability, wrongful intent, evil design or intentional and substantial disregard of an employer’s inte

1990On appeal to this court, [2] claimant raises two issues: (1) whether claimant committed willful misconduct; and (2) whether the Board incorrectly applied section 402(e) instead of section 3 of the Law. [3] As to the first issue, "willful misconduct" has been defined as "a wanton and willful disregard of an employer's interests, a deliberate violation of an employer's rules, a disregard of the standards of behavior which an employer can rightfully expect of an employee, or negligence manifesting culpability, wrongful intent, evil design or intentional and substantial disregard of an employer's

25
Graham v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen
pacommwct · 2004 · cited in 3 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2018–2021
23
Sheetz, Inc. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen
pacommwct · 1990 · cited in 3 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1994–2009
23
Harris v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen
pacommwct · 1982 · cited in 3 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1986–1987
23
Horan v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen
pacommwct · 1973 · cited in 3 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 1973–1974
23
Sipps v. Unemployment Comp. Bd. of Reviewgreen
pacommwct · 2018 · cited in 2 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2018–2018
22
American Process Lettering, Inc. v. Commonwealthgreen
pacommwct · 1980 · cited in 2 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2017–2017
22
Department of Corrections v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen
pacommwct · 2008 · cited in 2 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2016–2017
22
Grand Sport Auto Body v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Reviewgreen
pacommwct · 2012 · cited in 2 Pennsylvania opinions naming this issue, 2016–2016
22

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (27)

CaseCitedYears
DiAmico v. Commonwealth neutral
pacommwct · 1973
2 sentences

1975In interpreting the concept of willful misconduct, we have often stated that “ ‘ [m] isconduct within the meaning of an unemployment compensation act excluding from its benefit an employee discharged for misconduct must be an act of wanton or toilful disregard of the employer’s interest, a deliberate violation of the employer’s rules, a disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has the right to expect of his employe or negligence in such degree or recurrence as to manifest culpability, wrongful intent, or evil design, or show an intentional and substantial disregard of the employer

1975In interpreting the concept of willful misconduct, we have often stated that “ ‘ [m] isconduct within the meaning of an unemployment compensation act excluding from its benefit an employee discharged for misconduct must be an act of wanton or toilful disregard of the employer’s interest, a deliberate violation of the employer’s rules, a disregard of standards of behavior which the employer has the right to expect of his employe or negligence in such degree or recurrence as to manifest culpability, wrongful intent, or evil design, or show an intentional and substantial disregard of the employer

51974–1975
Weimer Unemployment Compensation Case green
pasuperct · 1954
2 sentences

1961Gagliardi Unemployment Compensation Case, 186 Pa. Superior Ct. 142 , 141 A. 2d 410 ; Weimer Unemployment Compensation Case, 176 Pa. Superior Ct. 348 , 107 A. 2d 607 ; Detterer Unemployment Compensation Case, 168 Pa. Superior Ct. 291 , 77 A. 2d 886 .

1961Gagliardi Unemployment Compensation Case, 186 Pa. Superior Ct. 142 , 141 A. 2d 410 ; Weimer Unemployment Compensation Case, 176 Pa. Superior Ct. 348 , 107 A. 2d 607 ; Detterer Unemployment Compensation Case, 168 Pa. Superior Ct. 291 , 77 A. 2d 886 .

51955–1961
Miller v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review green
pacommwct · 2014
42016–2023
Oyetayo v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review green
pacommwct · 2015
42018–2022
Heins v. UN. COMP. BD. OF REV. neutral
pacommwct · 1987
41989–1989
Henderson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review green
pacommwct · 2013
32017–2018
Andrews v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review green
pacommwct · 1993
31995–1998
Sopko Unemployment Compensation Case green
pasuperct · 1951
31954–1984
Semon v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review green
pacommwct · 1980
31981–1982
Philadelphia Transportation Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review green
pasuperct · 1958
31961–1962
Com., Dept. of Trans. v. Unemp. Comp. Bd. green
pacommwct · 2000
22018–2023
Turgeon v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review green
pacommwct · 2013
22016–2019
Bowser v. Blom green
pa · 2001
22004–2015
Arnold v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review neutral
pacommwct · 1997
21999–2009
Heitczman v. UNEMP. COMP. BD. OF REV. green
pacommwct · 1994
21998–2000
Knarr v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review neutral
pacommwct · 1990
21995–1997
Lee Hospital v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review green
pacommwct · 1991
21992–1992
Pma v. Unemp. Comp. Bd. of Review green
pacommwct · 1989
21991–1991
Wilson v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review neutral
pacommwct · 1983
21985–1988
Kronstadt v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review green
pacommwct · 1985
21987–1988
Pennsylvania Engineering Corp. v. Commonwealth neutral
pacommwct · 1979
21981–1982
Perry v. Commonwealth neutral
pacommwct · 1980
21981–1982
Murraysville Telephone Co. v. Commonwealth green
pacommwct · 1979
21980–1981
Holomshek v. Commonwealth green
pacommwct · 1979
21980–1981
Urso v. Commonwealth neutral
pacommwct · 1979
21980–1980
Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Filips green
pacommwct · 1975
21976–1976
Sun Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Commonwealth neutral
pacommwct · 1973
21974–1975

Where else courts name it

PA 522 (1909–2026) LA 132 (1955–2015) MO 71 (1954–2025) ID 43 (1953–2024) AR 22 (1934–2008) FL 21 (1980–2015) IN 17 (1950–2014) IL 14 (1875–2021) VA 13 (1989–2018) CA 13 (1973–2020) DC 12 (1972–2015) NV 12 (1986–2016) MI 11 (1946–1978) NJ 11 (1965–2019) KS 11 (1989–2021) NC 10 (1973–2026) NM 8 (1980–2020) MD 7 (1958–2019) OR 7 (1947–1978) TX 6 (1981–2024) AZ 6 (1972–1996) IA 5 (1991–2019) NH 5 (2003–2011) OH 4 (2006–2024) CT 4 (1961–2008) MN 4 (1984–2015) MA 4 (1921–2020) MS 4 (2000–2016) AL 4 (1987–2015) MT 3 (1984–2013) SC 3 (1982–2012) UT 3 (1983–2023) WA 3 (1970–2004) CO 3 (1982–2019) NY 3 (1985–2018) WV 2 (1997–2003) VI 2 (1994–2001) KY 2 (1995–2009)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check