13 Alabama opinions name it 2 courts 1845–2018 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Alabama courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Ex Parte Ocwen Federal Bank, FSBgreen2 sentences2018Bank, FSB , 872 So. 2d 810 , 813 (Ala. 2003). " 'Moreover, this Court will review by mandamus only those discovery matters involving (a) the disregard of a privilege, (b) the ordered production of "patently irrelevant or duplicative documents," (c) orders effectively eviscerating "a party's entire action or defense," and (d) orders denying a party the opportunity to make a record sufficient for appellate review of the discovery issue. 872 So.2d at 813 -14 .' " Ex parte Mobile Gas Serv. 2018Bank, FSB , 872 So. 2d 810 , 813 (Ala. 2003). " 'Moreover, this Court will review by mandamus only those discovery matters involving (a) the disregard of a privilege, (b) the ordered production of "patently irrelevant or duplicative documents," (c) orders effectively eviscerating "a party's entire action or defense," and (d) orders denying a party the opportunity to make a record sufficient for appellate review of the discovery issue. 872 So.2d at 813 -14 .' " Ex parte Mobile Gas Serv. | 5 | 10 |
Ex Parte Meadowbrook Ins. Group, Inc.green2 sentences2017Grp., Inc. , 987 So.2d 540 , 547 (Ala. 2007). 2015Group, Inc., 987 So.2d 540, 547 (Ala.2007).” Ex parte Mobile Gas Serv. | 3 | 4 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Alabama. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Parker v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.
green
1 sentence2018Corp. , 123 So.3d 499 , 504 (Ala. 2013) (quoting Ex parte Meadowbrook Ins. | 1 | 2018–2018 |
Jones v. Bell
neutral
2 sentences1925Jones v. Bell, 201 Ala. 336 , 77 So. 998 . 1925Jones v. Bell, 201 Ala. 336 , 77 So. 998 . | 1 | 1925–1925 |
Austill v. Crawford
neutral
1 sentence1848In Austill & Marshall v. Crawford, 7 Ala. Rep. 335 , the principal instructed his factors, in whose hands he placed cotton, not to sell for less than fourteen cents per pound: Held, that a disregard of this instruction, did not impose a liability on the factor to pay the difference between that price and a smaller sum at which the cotton was sold by him; but the actual injury sustained by the principal, was the criterion of the damages, and this could be ascertained by proof of the price at which cotton of the same quality was sold during the season. | 1 | 1848–1848 |
Short v. Skipwith
neutral
1 sentence1845The actual injury would be, the price at which it’might have been sold during the season, to be ascertained by the price at which cottons of that quality were actually sold for. [Webster v.DeTastet, 7 Term Rep. 157; Short v. Skipwith, 1 Brock. 103 .] The Court charged the jury that if the factors sold the cotton limited at fourteen cents per pound, at a less price, or shipped it without the consent of the owner, they were liable for the price as limited. | 1 | 1845–1845 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.