13 Illinois opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Palmolive Tower Condominiums, LLC v. Simongreen2 sentences2021ANALYSIS ¶ 35 Jurisdiction ¶ 36 Jurisdiction is a threshold issue which may be raised at any time (Geise v. Phoenix Co. of Chicago, Inc., 159 Ill. 2d 507, 515 (1994)), and this court has an independent duty to consider its jurisdiction and dismiss an appeal where jurisdiction is lacking (Palmolive Tower Condominiums, LLC v. Simon, 409 Ill. 2020ANALYSIS ¶ 35 Jurisdiction ¶ 36 Jurisdiction is a threshold issue which may be raised at any time (Geise v. Phoenix Co. of Chicago, Inc., 159 Ill. 2d 507, 515 (1994)), and this court has an independent duty to consider its jurisdiction and dismiss an appeal where jurisdiction is lacking (Palmolive Tower Condominiums, LLC v. Simon, 409 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
Geise v. Phoenix Co. of Chicago, Inc.green2 sentences2021ANALYSIS ¶ 35 Jurisdiction ¶ 36 Jurisdiction is a threshold issue which may be raised at any time (Geise v. Phoenix Co. of Chicago, Inc., 159 Ill. 2d 507, 515 (1994)), and this court has an independent duty to consider its jurisdiction and dismiss an appeal where jurisdiction is lacking (Palmolive Tower Condominiums, LLC v. Simon, 409 Ill. 2020ANALYSIS ¶ 35 Jurisdiction ¶ 36 Jurisdiction is a threshold issue which may be raised at any time (Geise v. Phoenix Co. of Chicago, Inc., 159 Ill. 2d 507, 515 (1994)), and this court has an independent duty to consider its jurisdiction and dismiss an appeal where jurisdiction is lacking (Palmolive Tower Condominiums, LLC v. Simon, 409 Ill. | 2 | 2 |
In Re JTgreen1 sentence2026“An appeal is considered moot where it presents no actual controversy or where the issues involved in the trial court no longer exist because intervening events have rendered it impossible for the reviewing court to grant effectual relief to the complaining party.” - 22 - 2026 IL App (2d) 250354-U In re J.T., 221 Ill. 2d 338, 349-50 (2006). | 1 | 1 |
People v. Phelpsgreen2 sentences2024People v. Phelps, 51 Ill. 2d 35, 38 (1972). ¶ 16 Moreover, defendant does not argue on appeal the unreasonable assistance of postconviction counsel for failing to shape and advance the Jennifer claim in the amended postconviction petition. 2024People v. Phelps, 51 Ill. 2d 35, 38 (1972). ¶ 16 Moreover, defendant does not argue on appeal the unreasonable assistance of postconviction counsel for failing to shape and advance the Jennifer claim in the amended postconviction petition. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Christopher S.green1 sentence2023“Neglect” is the “failure to exercise the care that circumstances justly demand and includes both willful and unintentional disregard of parental duties.” In re Christopher S., 364 Ill. | 1 | 1 |
In Re Marriage of Donovangreen1 sentence2021However, when those assets are viewed more objectively, the parties are similarly situated, and an approximately equal distribution, following a seven-year marriage, with Jennifer retaining slightly more of the marital property, cannot be found to be an abuse of discretion. ¶ 182 As to the issue of maintenance, Jennifer’s brief only mentions that she was not awarded any, and then after discussing the division of the marital estate issue at length, asks this court, “In the alternative, this Court should find that the trial court abused its discretion in not awarding Jennifer maintenance and sho | 1 | 1 |
Garrett v. Garrettgreen1 sentence2015Relying on Garrett v. Garrett, 341 Ill. 232, 234 (1930), Jennifer argued that, where a party seeks review of a judicial order while at the same time defying the trial court’s attempts to enforce that order, the appeal should be dismissed. ¶5 On October 1, 2014, we denied Jennifer’s motion to dismiss but ordered that this case be placed on inactive status until December 15, 2014. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In re Parentage of M.M.
green
2 sentences2015Nor did the court credit Jennifer’s defense that she held off on seeking an increase in child support in light of the alleged 2002 agreement. ¶ 24 The court said that it was Jennifer’s choice to be a homemaker and found that she “clearly has imputed income from her current spouse.” The court indicated that Tim “makes -8- 2015 IL App (2d) 140772 around [$]130,000 a year,” except for 2013, when his income went down a little bit. 2015Nor did the court credit Jennifer’s defense that she held off on seeking an increase in child support in light of the alleged 2002 agreement. ¶ 24 The court said that it was Jennifer’s choice to be a homemaker and found that she “clearly has imputed income from her current spouse.” The court indicated that Tim “makes -8- 2015 IL App (2d) 140772 around [$]130,000 a year,” except for 2013, when his income went down a little bit. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Moore v. Green
green
2 sentences2008“The cardinal rule of statutory construction is to ascertain and give effect to the legislature’s intent.” Moore, 219 Ill. 2d at 479 , 848 N.E.2d at 1020 . 2008“The cardinal rule of statutory construction is to ascertain and give effect to the legislature’s intent.” Moore, 219 Ill. 2d at 479 , 848 N.E.2d at 1020 . | 2 | 2008–2008 |
In re Marriage of Peters-Farrell
neutral
2 sentences2005The appellate court allowed the interlocutory appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308 (155 Ill. 2d R. 308). 345 Ill. 2005The appellate court allowed the interlocutory appeal pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 308 (155 Ill. 2d R. 308). 345 Ill. | 2 | 2005–2005 |
In re Marriage of Hochstatter
green
2 sentences2021Therefore, the trial court did not abuse its discretion in allowing for the deduction of the $80,000 rent payment from income for Daniel. ¶ 147 Next, we turn to Jennifer’s claim that the trial court erred by allowing Daniel’s business depreciation, which he claimed on his 2018 tax return, to be factored into the income amount used for the determination of the child support award. ¶ 148 “It is clear that section 505(a)(3.1)(A) now explicitly excludes accelerated depreciation from the calculation of net business income and does not explicitly mention nonaccelerated depreciation.” In re Marriage 2021“The implication from the continued omission of nonaccelerated depreciation from the plain language of the statute is that it could still be deducted, but only if the court, in its discretion, determines it to be an appropriate and reasonable business expense that is required to carry on the trade or business.” (Emphasis in original.) Id. ¶ 149 Thus, under section 505, the court must first determine if any amount of the claimed depreciation is accelerated depreciation. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
In re Marriage of Vance
green
1 sentence2021One’s mere acknowledgment of depreciation deductions during trial testimony or a submitting of a tax return as evidence without further explanation does not constitute “explaining the basis for the depreciation deduction.” In re Marriage of Vance, 2016 IL App (3d) 150717, ¶ 43 . ¶ 151 We note that, incredibly, nowhere in Jennifer’s brief does she expand upon her claim that the deduction of depreciation was improperly allowed by the trial court. | 1 | 2021–2021 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.