13 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1939–1990 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Zeigler v. His Creditorsgreen2 sentences1969(See quotation immediately preceding.) There was no creditor with preferable claims “ * * * by reason of his privileges * * * ”, from whom these subcontractors could purchase with right of subrogation under Civil Code Article 2161 (1)- The majority rejects the French authorities such as Planiol and Aubry and Rau by stating in footnote that the court in Ziegler v. His Creditors (on rehearing), 49 La.Ann. 144, 187 , 21 So. 666, 684 (1897), found some variance in the French authorities on the question of legal subrogation. 1969(See quotation immediately preceding.) There was no creditor with preferable claims “ * * * by reason of his privileges * * * ”, from whom these subcontractors could purchase with right of subrogation under Civil Code Article 2161 (1)- The majority rejects the French authorities such as Planiol and Aubry and Rau by stating in footnote that the court in Ziegler v. His Creditors (on rehearing), 49 La.Ann. 144, 187 , 21 So. 666, 684 (1897), found some variance in the French authorities on the question of legal subrogation. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Lumber Products, Inc. v. Crochet
green
2 sentences1975Such notice of filing suit shall preserve the privilege until the court in which the suit is filed shall order the cancellation of the said inscription of the said claim and the notice of the filing of suit on said claim or until the claimant authorizes the clerk of court or recorder of mortgages to cancel the said inscriptions. * * * "Any person furnishing service or material or performing any labor on the said building or other work to or for a contractor or sub-contractor, when a contract, oral or written has been entered into, but no contract has been timely recorded, shall have a personal 1975Such notice of filing suit shall preserve the privilege until the court in which the suit is filed shall order the cancellation of the said inscription of the said claim and the notice of the filing of suit on said claim or until the claimant authorizes the clerk of court or recorder of mortgages to cancel the said inscriptions. * * * "Any person furnishing service or material or performing any labor on the said building or other work to or for a contractor or sub-contractor, when a contract, oral or written has been entered into, but no contract has been timely recorded, shall have a personal | 3 | 1965–1975 |
Scott v. Kemper Ins. Co.
green
1 sentence1990As explained in Scott v. Kemper Insurance Company, 377 So.2d 66 (La.1979): Unlike the situation in Calk , where recordation of the contingency fee contract is irrelevant in a contest between an attorney and the client's creditor, imposition of an obligation upon the client's obligor in the suit to retain settlement funds until determination of the fee entitlement, is dependent upon the attorney's full compliance with R.S. 37:218, including the recordation of a contract as stipulated therein. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Calk v. Highland Const. & Mfg.
green
1 sentence1990Calk v. *475 Highland Construction and Manufacturing, 376 So.2d 495 (La.1979). [1] However, the recordation requirement is applicable to the situation in the instant case, where the discharged attorney seeks to impose an obligation on the opposing parties in the main demand. | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Authement's Ornamental Iron Works, Inc. v. Reisfeld
green
1 sentence1981Authement's Ornamental Iron Works, Inc. v. Reisfeld, 376 So.2d 1061 (La.App. 4th Cir., 1979), writs denied 378 So.2d 1390 (La.1980). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Campo v. Campo
green
1 sentence1981Authement's Ornamental Iron Works, Inc. v. Reisfeld, 376 So.2d 1061 (La.App. 4th Cir., 1979), writs denied 378 So.2d 1390 (La.1980). | 1 | 1981–1981 |
Bergeron v. Con-Plex, Inc.
neutral
1 sentence1976In essence, plaintiffs argue that a trespasser is not a "third party" who is protected by the recordation doctrine, citing Bergeron v. Con-Plex, Inc., 255 So.2d 397 (La.App. 1st Cir. 1971). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
State v. Board of Trustees, Teachers' Retirement
neutral
1 sentence1973NOTES [1] British American Oil Producing Company v. Grizzaffi, La.App., 135 So.2d 559 , and cases cited therein; State v. Board of Trustees, Teachers' Retirement, etc., La.App., 29 So.2d 489 . [2] In pertinent part the statute reads: "The effect of the recordation of the claim shall cease and the privilege preserved by this recordation shall perempt unless a notice of filing of suit (giving the name of the court, the title and number of the proceedings and date of filing, a description of the property and a reference to the recorded contract), on said claim is recorded within one year from the | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Apex Sales Company v. Abraham
green
1 sentence1973NOTES [1] British American Oil Producing Company v. Grizzaffi, La.App., 135 So.2d 559 , and cases cited therein; State v. Board of Trustees, Teachers' Retirement, etc., La.App., 29 So.2d 489 . [2] In pertinent part the statute reads: "The effect of the recordation of the claim shall cease and the privilege preserved by this recordation shall perempt unless a notice of filing of suit (giving the name of the court, the title and number of the proceedings and date of filing, a description of the property and a reference to the recorded contract), on said claim is recorded within one year from the | 1 | 1973–1973 |
British American Oil Producing Company v. Grizzaffi
green
1 sentence1973NOTES [1] British American Oil Producing Company v. Grizzaffi, La.App., 135 So.2d 559 , and cases cited therein; State v. Board of Trustees, Teachers' Retirement, etc., La.App., 29 So.2d 489 . [2] In pertinent part the statute reads: "The effect of the recordation of the claim shall cease and the privilege preserved by this recordation shall perempt unless a notice of filing of suit (giving the name of the court, the title and number of the proceedings and date of filing, a description of the property and a reference to the recorded contract), on said claim is recorded within one year from the | 1 | 1973–1973 |
Pringle-Associated Mortgage Corporation v. Eanes
green
2 sentences1972Pringle-Associated Mortgage Corp. v. Eanes, 254 La. 705 , 226 So.2d 502 (1969). 1972Pringle-Associated Mortgage Corp. v. Eanes, 254 La. 705 , 226 So.2d 502 (1969). | 1 | 1972–1972 |
Schwartz Supply Co. v. Zimmerman
green
2 sentences1971LSA-C.C. art. 17; Schwartz Supply Company v. Zimmerman, 228 La. 861 , 84 So.2d 438 (1955). 1971LSA-C.C. art. 17; Schwartz Supply Company v. Zimmerman, 228 La. 861 , 84 So.2d 438 (1955). | 1 | 1971–1971 |
Shreveport Long Leaf Lumber Co. v. Wilson
green
2 sentences1968Both Plaintiff and Defendant contend that one who seeks the benefit of the Mechanic’s Lien Statute (LSA-R.S. 9:4812) must not only institute suit before the expiration of one year from the recordation of the privilege, but must also reinscribe its lien and privilege annually until the suit is terminated, citing Lumber Products, Inc. v. Crochet, 244 La. 1060 , 156 So.2d 438 ; Shreveport Long Leaf Lumber Co. v. Wilson, 195 La. 814 , 197 So. 566 . 1968Both Plaintiff and Defendant contend that one who seeks the benefit of the Mechanic’s Lien Statute (LSA-R.S. 9:4812) must not only institute suit before the expiration of one year from the recordation of the privilege, but must also reinscribe its lien and privilege annually until the suit is terminated, citing Lumber Products, Inc. v. Crochet, 244 La. 1060 , 156 So.2d 438 ; Shreveport Long Leaf Lumber Co. v. Wilson, 195 La. 814 , 197 So. 566 . | 1 | 1968–1968 |
Agurs v. Belcher & Creswell
neutral
2 sentences1964Plaintiffs cite the rule that the in-dices are no part of the records for purposes of the recordation requirement of LSA-C.C. art. 2266; and that an erroneous indexing does not affect the validity of the recordation; Agurs v. Belcher & Creswell, 111 La. 378 , 35 So. 607 (1903). 1964Plaintiffs cite the rule that the in-dices are no part of the records for purposes of the recordation requirement of LSA-C.C. art. 2266; and that an erroneous indexing does not affect the validity of the recordation; Agurs v. Belcher & Creswell, 111 La. 378 , 35 So. 607 (1903). | 1 | 1964–1964 |
National Homestead Ass'n v. Graham
neutral
2 sentences1952National Homestead Association v. Graham, 176 La. 1062 , 147 So. 348 . 1952National Homestead Association v. Graham, 176 La. 1062 , 147 So. 348 . | 1 | 1952–1952 |
Taylor v. Succession of Sweetman
neutral
2 sentences1939Taylor v. Succession of Sweetman, 184 La. 755 , 167 So. 431 . 1939Taylor v. Succession of Sweetman, 184 La. 755 , 167 So. 431 . | 1 | 1939–1939 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.