13 Michigan opinions name it 2 courts 1976–2026 8 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Michigan courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
People v. Collinsgreen2 sentences2025See People v Collins, 388 Mich 680, 691 ; 202 NW2d 769 (1972). 2024See Smith, ___ Mich App at ___; slip op at 5. 1 These factors were identified in Barker v Wingo, 407 US 514 ; 92 S Ct 2182 ; 33 L Ed 2d 101 (1972), and first applied by the Michigan Supreme Court in Collins, 388 Mich at 688-695 . -3- Plea negotiations, the withdrawal of defense counsel, and court shutdowns account for approximately 5 months of the 23-month delay, with only 1 month being clearly attributable to defendant. | 4 | 7 |
People v. Williamsgreen1 sentence2026See Williams, 475 Mich at 262-263 . | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Michigan. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Barker v. Wingo
green
2 sentences2024See Smith, ___ Mich App at ___; slip op at 5. 1 These factors were identified in Barker v Wingo, 407 US 514 ; 92 S Ct 2182 ; 33 L Ed 2d 101 (1972), and first applied by the Michigan Supreme Court in Collins, 388 Mich at 688-695 . -3- Plea negotiations, the withdrawal of defense counsel, and court shutdowns account for approximately 5 months of the 23-month delay, with only 1 month being clearly attributable to defendant. 2024See Smith, ___ Mich App at ___; slip op at 5. 1 These factors were identified in Barker v Wingo, 407 US 514 ; 92 S Ct 2182 ; 33 L Ed 2d 101 (1972), and first applied by the Michigan Supreme Court in Collins, 388 Mich at 688-695 . -3- Plea negotiations, the withdrawal of defense counsel, and court shutdowns account for approximately 5 months of the 23-month delay, with only 1 month being clearly attributable to defendant. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Sprenger v. Bickle
green
1 sentence2014In that circumstance, if the alleged father did not know or have reason to know before entry of a divorce judgment that a child’s mother was married, and if the other requirements in Subsections (3) (a)(ii) through (iv) were satisfied, the alleged father could proceed because either Subsection (3)(a) or (c) would have been definitively established, despite being unable to pinpoint the specific subsection that was established. 3 We note that there is no dispute that the child was born premature. 4 The first panel, while not specifically deciding the issue, apparently leaned toward agreeing with | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Broadway Coney Island, Inc. v. Commercial Union Insurance Companies
green
1 sentence2003Id. at 113 . | 1 | 2003–2003 |
Felice v. Cheboygan County Zoning Commission
green
1 sentence2000Id. at 746 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
Oakland County Board v. Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass'n
green
2 sentences1999Oakland Co Bd of Rd Co Comm’rs v Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass’n, 456 Mich 590, 610 ; 575 NW2d 751 (1998). 1999Oakland Co Bd of Rd Co Comm’rs v Michigan Property & Casualty Guaranty Ass’n, 456 Mich 590, 610 ; 575 NW2d 751 (1998). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Miranda v. Arizona
green
2 sentences1999MCL 257.625d; MSA 9.2325(4). [7] The present statutory language is substantively similar, providing that "[l]iability for a crime or civil damages predicated on the act of withdrawing or analyzing blood and related procedures does not attach to a licensed physician or individual operating under the delegation of a licensed physician who withdraws or analyzes blood or assists in the withdrawal or analysis in accordance with this act unless the withdrawal or analysis is performed in a negligent manner." MCL 257.625a(6)(c); MSA 9.2325(1)(6)(c). [8] Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 1999MCL 257.625d; MSA 9.2325(4). [7] The present statutory language is substantively similar, providing that "[l]iability for a crime or civil damages predicated on the act of withdrawing or analyzing blood and related procedures does not attach to a licensed physician or individual operating under the delegation of a licensed physician who withdraws or analyzes blood or assists in the withdrawal or analysis in accordance with this act unless the withdrawal or analysis is performed in a negligent manner." MCL 257.625a(6)(c); MSA 9.2325(1)(6)(c). [8] Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 | 1 | 1999–1999 |
People v. John Haddad
green
2 sentences1976People v John Haddad, 306 Mich 556 ; 11 NW2d 240 (1943). 1976People v John Haddad, 306 Mich 556 ; 11 NW2d 240 (1943). | 1 | 1976–1976 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.