withdrawal hearing (Ohio) · Go Syfert
← Ohio issues

withdrawal hearing in Ohio

6 Ohio opinions name it 2 courts 2005–2020 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Ohio courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

CaseFollowedCited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Ohio. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (9)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Read-Bates green
ohioctapp · 2020
1 sentence

2020Cuyahoga Nos. 108848, 108849, 108850, 108851, 2020-Ohio-3456, ¶ 27 , citing Cleveland v. Brown, 8th Dist.

12020–2020
State v. Pless green
ohio · 1996
1 sentence

2019A withdrawal of a waiver before trial is preferable so that proper preparations can be made for the jurors’ presence.” Id. {¶15} In this assignment of error, Ames fails to present any citations to case law or statutes in support of his assertions. “[A] defendant has the burden of affirmatively demonstrating the error of the trial court on appeal.” State v. Stelzer, 9th Dist.

12019–2019
State v. Stepler, Unpublished Decision (12-27-2006) green
ohioctapp · 2006
1 sentence

2019Summit No. 23174, 2006-Ohio-6912, ¶ 7 , citing State v. Cook, 9th Dist.

12019–2019
State v. Watkins neutral
ohio · 2016
2 sentences

2017Franklin No. 13AP-133, 2013-Ohio-5544 , 2013 WL 6708397 , ¶ 11, reversed on other grounds, 150 Ohio St.3d 366 , 2016-Ohio-8464 , 81 N.E.3d 1241 (noting that "the trial court is in the best position to evaluate both the motivation of the defendant in pleading guilty and the credibility and weight to be given to the reasons offered for seeking withdrawal of the plea"). {¶ 29} Likewise, in the case sub judice, the trial court observed appellant at both the change of plea hearing and at the withdrawal hearing.

2017Franklin No. 13AP-133, 2013-Ohio-5544 , 2013 WL 6708397 , ¶ 11, reversed on other grounds, 150 Ohio St.3d 366 , 2016-Ohio-8464 , 81 N.E.3d 1241 (noting that "the trial court is in the best position to evaluate both the motivation of the defendant in pleading guilty and the credibility and weight to be given to the reasons offered for seeking withdrawal of the plea"). {¶ 29} Likewise, in the case sub judice, the trial court observed appellant at both the change of plea hearing and at the withdrawal hearing.

12017–2017
State v. Watkins (Slip Opinion) neutral
ohio · 2016
1 sentence

2017Franklin No. 13AP-133, 2013-Ohio-5544 , 2013 WL 6708397 , ¶ 11, reversed on other grounds, 150 Ohio St.3d 366 , 2016-Ohio-8464 , 81 N.E.3d 1241 (noting that "the trial court is in the best position to evaluate both the motivation of the defendant in pleading guilty and the credibility and weight to be given to the reasons offered for seeking withdrawal of the plea"). {¶ 29} Likewise, in the case sub judice, the trial court observed appellant at both the change of plea hearing and at the withdrawal hearing.

12017–2017
State v. Watkins green
ohioctapp · 2013
1 sentence

2017Franklin No. 13AP-133, 2013-Ohio-5544 , 2013 WL 6708397 , ¶ 11, reversed on other grounds, 150 Ohio St.3d 366 , 2016-Ohio-8464 , 81 N.E.3d 1241 (noting that "the trial court is in the best position to evaluate both the motivation of the defendant in pleading guilty and the credibility and weight to be given to the reasons offered for seeking withdrawal of the plea"). {¶ 29} Likewise, in the case sub judice, the trial court observed appellant at both the change of plea hearing and at the withdrawal hearing.

12017–2017
State v. Thomas, Unpublished Decision (2-2-2007) neutral
ohioctapp · 2007
1 sentence

2015Decision, Order, and Entry Overruling Defendant’s Motion to Vacate Guilty Plea, Doc. #144, p. 14. {¶ 44} We have often stressed that “[t]he trial court is in the best position to assess witness credibility.” (Citation omitted.) State v. Thomas, 2d Dist Greene No. 2006 CA 57, 2007-Ohio-443, ¶ 12 .

12015–2015
State v. Piacella green
ohio · 1971
2 sentences

2012State v. Piacella, 27 Ohio St.2d 92 , 271 N.E.2d 852 (1971), syllabus. {¶27} The majority of the arguments that Adams made in his motion to withdraw and at the withdrawal hearing concerned his understanding of an Alford plea.

2012State v. Piacella, 27 Ohio St.2d 92 , 271 N.E.2d 852 (1971), syllabus. {¶27} The majority of the arguments that Adams made in his motion to withdraw and at the withdrawal hearing concerned his understanding of an Alford plea.

12012–2012
City of Marysville v. Foreman green
ohioctapp · 1992
1 sentence

2005A withdrawal of a waiver before trial is preferable so that proper preparations can be made for the jurors' presence." Id. {¶ 19} The court in Foreman decided that the defendant in that case did not withdraw his waiver in a reasonable time since he did so after the witnesses had been sworn.

12005–2005

Where else courts name it

MO 89 (1928–2019) TX 36 (1944–2026) PA 29 (1862–2025) IL 21 (1969–2025) CA 17 (1912–2022) FL 13 (1956–2016) NY 13 (1879–2013) MI 13 (1976–2026) IN 12 (1888–1989) VA 11 (1884–2011) GA 9 (1885–2025) IA 8 (1968–2017) NC 7 (1956–2019) CT 7 (1950–2017) MT 7 (1930–2026) MD 6 (1978–2022) OH 6 (2005–2020) CO 5 (1926–2019) MS 5 (2007–2024) OK 5 (1938–2025) ME 4 (2006–2023) MA 4 (1998–2013) OR 4 (1902–2021) NV 3 (1978–2015) KS 3 (2000–2022) WA 3 (1984–2020) MN 3 (1971–2014) DC 3 (1999–2014) TN 3 (1989–2025) NE 3 (1957–2016) AL 3 (1888–1983) NJ 2 (2012–2017) KY 2 (2001–2021) UT 2 (2006–2006) HI 2 (1961–2003) VT 2 (2005–2018) NH 2 (1985–2020)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check