13 Pennsylvania opinions name it 3 courts 1975–2025 3 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Pennsylvania courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sanders Appealgreen2 sentences2018See In re Sanders Children, 312 A.2d at 417 . 2018See In re Sanders Children, 312 A.2d at 417 . | 2 | 2 |
In Re Jacksongreen2 sentences1981See In re Jackson, 267 Pa.Super. 428, 432 , 406 A.2d 1116, 1118 (1979) (“[WJhen the hearing judge believes the evidence offered at a dependency hearing to be incomplete he not only may but ‘should receive, and if necessary should seek out, evidence from objective, disinterested witnesses.’ ”) (quoting In the Interest of LaRue, 244 Pa.Super. 218, 229 , 366 A.2d 1271, 1276 (1976)). 4 Because of the errors described above, we must vacate the lower court’s order and remand the case for a new hearing in accordance with this opinion. 1981See In re Jackson, 267 Pa.Super. 428, 432 , 406 A.2d 1116, 1118 (1979) (“[WJhen the hearing judge believes the evidence offered at a dependency hearing to be incomplete he not only may but ‘should receive, and if necessary should seek out, evidence from objective, disinterested witnesses.’ ”) (quoting In the Interest of LaRue, 244 Pa.Super. 218, 229 , 366 A.2d 1271, 1276 (1976)). 4 Because of the errors described above, we must vacate the lower court’s order and remand the case for a new hearing in accordance with this opinion. | 2 | 2 |
In the Interest of LaRuegreen2 sentences1981See In re Jackson, 267 Pa.Super. 428, 432 , 406 A.2d 1116, 1118 (1979) (“[WJhen the hearing judge believes the evidence offered at a dependency hearing to be incomplete he not only may but ‘should receive, and if necessary should seek out, evidence from objective, disinterested witnesses.’ ”) (quoting In the Interest of LaRue, 244 Pa.Super. 218, 229 , 366 A.2d 1271, 1276 (1976)). 4 Because of the errors described above, we must vacate the lower court’s order and remand the case for a new hearing in accordance with this opinion. 1981See In re Jackson, 267 Pa.Super. 428, 432 , 406 A.2d 1116, 1118 (1979) (“[WJhen the hearing judge believes the evidence offered at a dependency hearing to be incomplete he not only may but ‘should receive, and if necessary should seek out, evidence from objective, disinterested witnesses.’ ”) (quoting In the Interest of LaRue, 244 Pa.Super. 218, 229 , 366 A.2d 1271, 1276 (1976)). 4 Because of the errors described above, we must vacate the lower court’s order and remand the case for a new hearing in accordance with this opinion. | 2 | 2 |
Cisco v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Boardgreen1 sentence2021See, e.g., Martell v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Doyle Equipment), 707 A.2d 242, 244 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1998) (“While . . . the Board has broad discretion to order rehearing where the interests of justice so require, they do not mandate rehearing every time a losing party can point to some evidence which his attorney did not introduce.”); UGI Corp. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Wagner), 566 A.2d 1264, 1265 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1989) (concluding that a rehearing was not merited where the appeal forms contained only bald and conclusory statements of after-discovered evidence, with no suppor | 1 | 1 |
UGI Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Boardgreen1 sentence2021See, e.g., Martell v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Doyle Equipment), 707 A.2d 242, 244 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1998) (“While . . . the Board has broad discretion to order rehearing where the interests of justice so require, they do not mandate rehearing every time a losing party can point to some evidence which his attorney did not introduce.”); UGI Corp. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Wagner), 566 A.2d 1264, 1265 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1989) (concluding that a rehearing was not merited where the appeal forms contained only bald and conclusory statements of after-discovered evidence, with no suppor | 1 | 1 |
Puhl v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Boardgreen1 sentence2021See, e.g., Martell v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Doyle Equipment), 707 A.2d 242, 244 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1998) (“While . . . the Board has broad discretion to order rehearing where the interests of justice so require, they do not mandate rehearing every time a losing party can point to some evidence which his attorney did not introduce.”); UGI Corp. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Wagner), 566 A.2d 1264, 1265 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1989) (concluding that a rehearing was not merited where the appeal forms contained only bald and conclusory statements of after-discovered evidence, with no suppor | 1 | 1 |
Martell v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Boardgreen1 sentence2021See, e.g., Martell v. Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Doyle Equipment), 707 A.2d 242, 244 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1998) (“While . . . the Board has broad discretion to order rehearing where the interests of justice so require, they do not mandate rehearing every time a losing party can point to some evidence which his attorney did not introduce.”); UGI Corp. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Wagner), 566 A.2d 1264, 1265 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1989) (concluding that a rehearing was not merited where the appeal forms contained only bald and conclusory statements of after-discovered evidence, with no suppor | 1 | 1 |
Branch v. Jacksongreen2 sentences1994See Branch v. Jackson, 427 Pa.Super. 417 , 629 A.2d 170 (1993) (citing 23 Pa.C.S.A. § 5102(a)). [2] Pa.R.C.P. 1910.16-2. [3] Pa.R.C.P. 1910.16-3. [4] In formulating the parties' respective support obligations, in addition to the incomes/earning potentials of the parties, the trial court must also take into consideration Father's preexisting support obligation in the amount of $30.00 per week to his son in Perry County, the fact that he is currently married and supports an infant born of that marriage, and other applicable factors listed in the guidelines. [5] Because we vacate the support orde 1994See Branch v. Jackson, 427 Pa.Super. 417 , 629 A.2d 170 (1993) (citing 23 Pa.C.S.A. § 5102(a)). [2] Pa.R.C.P. 1910.16-2. [3] Pa.R.C.P. 1910.16-3. [4] In formulating the parties' respective support obligations, in addition to the incomes/earning potentials of the parties, the trial court must also take into consideration Father's preexisting support obligation in the amount of $30.00 per week to his son in Perry County, the fact that he is currently married and supports an infant born of that marriage, and other applicable factors listed in the guidelines. [5] Because we vacate the support orde | 1 | 1 |
Commonwealth v. Younggreen2 sentences1976Accord, Commonwealth v. Young, 439 Pa. 498 , 269 A.2d 18 (1970). 1976Accord, Commonwealth v. Young, 439 Pa. 498 , 269 A.2d 18 (1970). | 1 | 1 |
Felsing v. Beininggreen2 sentences1975See also Felsing v. Beining, 236 Pa. Superior Ct. 202 , 345 A.2d 290 (1975). 1975See also Felsing v. Beining, 236 Pa. Superior Ct. 202 , 345 A.2d 290 (1975). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Pennsylvania. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
In Re: A.J.R.-H. and I.G.R.-H. Apl of KJR Mother
green
2 sentences2025Id. (citation omitted). - 19 - J-A10001-25 By contrast, in this case, Appellant’s arguments focus solely upon a single sentence in Ms. Cawley’s testimony indicating that someone from the Agency had established contact with Appellant’s mother. 2025Id. (citation omitted). | 2 | 2025–2025 |
Commonwealth v. Ware
green
2 sentences1995Hence, we would specifically overrule Commonwealth v. Godfrey, 177 Pa.Super. 640 , 112 A.2d 434 (1955) 4 which we conclude has been overruled sub silentio by Commonwealth v. Drew, supra, 500 Pa. at 585 , 459 A.2d 318 ; Commonwealth v. Yost, supra, 478 Pa. at 327 , 386 A.2d 956 ; and Commonwealth v. Ware, supra, 459 Pa. at 334 , 329 A.2d 258 ; and we reverse the order adjudicating the appellant delinquent and remand the case for a new hearing. 1995Hence, we would specifically overrule Commonwealth v. Godfrey, 177 Pa.Super. 640 , 112 A.2d 434 (1955) 4 which we conclude has been overruled sub silentio by Commonwealth v. Drew, supra, 500 Pa. at 585 , 459 A.2d 318 ; Commonwealth v. Yost, supra, 478 Pa. at 327 , 386 A.2d 956 ; and Commonwealth v. Ware, supra, 459 Pa. at 334 , 329 A.2d 258 ; and we reverse the order adjudicating the appellant delinquent and remand the case for a new hearing. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Commonwealth v. Yost
green
2 sentences1995Hence, we would specifically overrule Commonwealth v. Godfrey, 177 Pa.Super. 640 , 112 A.2d 434 (1955) 4 which we conclude has been overruled sub silentio by Commonwealth v. Drew, supra, 500 Pa. at 585 , 459 A.2d 318 ; Commonwealth v. Yost, supra, 478 Pa. at 327 , 386 A.2d 956 ; and Commonwealth v. Ware, supra, 459 Pa. at 334 , 329 A.2d 258 ; and we reverse the order adjudicating the appellant delinquent and remand the case for a new hearing. 1995Hence, we would specifically overrule Commonwealth v. Godfrey, 177 Pa.Super. 640 , 112 A.2d 434 (1955) 4 which we conclude has been overruled sub silentio by Commonwealth v. Drew, supra, 500 Pa. at 585 , 459 A.2d 318 ; Commonwealth v. Yost, supra, 478 Pa. at 327 , 386 A.2d 956 ; and Commonwealth v. Ware, supra, 459 Pa. at 334 , 329 A.2d 258 ; and we reverse the order adjudicating the appellant delinquent and remand the case for a new hearing. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Commonwealth v. Godfrey
green
2 sentences1995Hence, we would specifically overrule Commonwealth v. Godfrey, 177 Pa.Super. 640 , 112 A.2d 434 (1955) 4 which we conclude has been overruled sub silentio by Commonwealth v. Drew, supra, 500 Pa. at 585 , 459 A.2d 318 ; Commonwealth v. Yost, supra, 478 Pa. at 327 , 386 A.2d 956 ; and Commonwealth v. Ware, supra, 459 Pa. at 334 , 329 A.2d 258 ; and we reverse the order adjudicating the appellant delinquent and remand the case for a new hearing. 1995Hence, we would specifically overrule Commonwealth v. Godfrey, 177 Pa.Super. 640 , 112 A.2d 434 (1955) 4 which we conclude has been overruled sub silentio by Commonwealth v. Drew, supra, 500 Pa. at 585 , 459 A.2d 318 ; Commonwealth v. Yost, supra, 478 Pa. at 327 , 386 A.2d 956 ; and Commonwealth v. Ware, supra, 459 Pa. at 334 , 329 A.2d 258 ; and we reverse the order adjudicating the appellant delinquent and remand the case for a new hearing. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Commonwealth v. Drew
green
2 sentences1995Hence, we would specifically overrule Commonwealth v. Godfrey, 177 Pa.Super. 640 , 112 A.2d 434 (1955) 4 which we conclude has been overruled sub silentio by Commonwealth v. Drew, supra, 500 Pa. at 585 , 459 A.2d 318 ; Commonwealth v. Yost, supra, 478 Pa. at 327 , 386 A.2d 956 ; and Commonwealth v. Ware, supra, 459 Pa. at 334 , 329 A.2d 258 ; and we reverse the order adjudicating the appellant delinquent and remand the case for a new hearing. 1995Hence, we would specifically overrule Commonwealth v. Godfrey, 177 Pa.Super. 640 , 112 A.2d 434 (1955) 4 which we conclude has been overruled sub silentio by Commonwealth v. Drew, supra, 500 Pa. at 585 , 459 A.2d 318 ; Commonwealth v. Yost, supra, 478 Pa. at 327 , 386 A.2d 956 ; and Commonwealth v. Ware, supra, 459 Pa. at 334 , 329 A.2d 258 ; and we reverse the order adjudicating the appellant delinquent and remand the case for a new hearing. | 1 | 1995–1995 |
Molyneaux v. Commonwealth
green
1 sentence1983In Lundy we relied upon our earlier decision in Molyneaux v. Department of Public Welfare, 44 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 111 , 403 A.2d 635 (1979), where we held .that 55 Pa. Code §183.44 unlawfully and irrebuttably presumed that the income of a father who was residing with his children was available to them. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Lundy v. Commonwealth
neutral
2 sentences1983The petitioner ,s.ays that the issue is controEed by our previous determination in Lundy v. Department of Public Welfare, 54 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 1 , 419 A.2d 801 (1980), where it is true that on virtually identical facts we held that the presumption created by DPW regulation, 55 Pa. Code §183.44 , violated due process and therefore remanded the case for a new hearing to determine the amount of the mother’s income which was available to her children. 1983The petitioner ,s.ays that the issue is controEed by our previous determination in Lundy v. Department of Public Welfare, 54 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 1 , 419 A.2d 801 (1980), where it is true that on virtually identical facts we held that the presumption created by DPW regulation, 55 Pa. Code §183.44 , violated due process and therefore remanded the case for a new hearing to determine the amount of the mother’s income which was available to her children. | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Katz v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
green
2 sentences1983Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Ceja, 493 Pa. 588 , 427 A.2d 631 (1981); Robinson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 60 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 275 , 431 A.2d 378 (1981); Katz v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 59 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 427 , 430 A.2d 354 (1981). 1983Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Ceja, 493 Pa. 588 , 427 A.2d 631 (1981); Robinson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 60 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 275 , 431 A.2d 378 (1981); Katz v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 59 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 427 , 430 A.2d 354 (1981). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Robinson v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review
green
2 sentences1983Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Ceja, 493 Pa. 588 , 427 A.2d 631 (1981); Robinson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 60 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 275 , 431 A.2d 378 (1981); Katz v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 59 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 427 , 430 A.2d 354 (1981). 1983Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Ceja, 493 Pa. 588 , 427 A.2d 631 (1981); Robinson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 60 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 275 , 431 A.2d 378 (1981); Katz v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 59 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 427 , 430 A.2d 354 (1981). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Ceja
green
2 sentences1983Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Ceja, 493 Pa. 588 , 427 A.2d 631 (1981); Robinson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 60 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 275 , 431 A.2d 378 (1981); Katz v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 59 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 427 , 430 A.2d 354 (1981). 1983Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Ceja, 493 Pa. 588 , 427 A.2d 631 (1981); Robinson v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 60 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 275 , 431 A.2d 378 (1981); Katz v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 59 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 427 , 430 A.2d 354 (1981). | 1 | 1983–1983 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.