13 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Republic National Bank of Dallas v. Northwest National Bank of Fort Worthgreen2 sentences2002However, the supreme court has recognized that prejudgment interest is "recoverable as a matter of right where an ascertainable sum of money is determined to have been due and payable at a date certain prior to judgment." Republic Nat'l Bank v. Northwest Nat'l Bank , 578 S.W.2d 109, 116 (Tex. 1979). 2002However, the supreme court has recognized that prejudgment interest is Arecoverable as a matter of right where an ascertainable sum of money is determined to have been due and payable at a date certain prior to judgment.@ Republic Nat=l Bank v. Northwest Nat=l Bank, 578 S.W.2d 109, 116 (Tex. 12 The Erdeljacs pleaded both specific performance of the Agreement, including payment of $275,000, and damages for breach of the Agreement at a minimum of $275,000. | 3 | 3 |
Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc.green2 sentences2002Prejudgment interest is "compensation allowed by law as additional damages for lost use of the money due as damages during the lapse of time between the accrual of the claim and the date of judgment." Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc. , 962 S.W.2d 507, 528 (Tex. 1998). 2002Prejudgment interest is "compensation allowed by law as additional damages for lost use of the money due as damages during the lapse of time between the accrual of the claim and the date of judgment." Johnson & Higgins of Texas, Inc. v. Kenneco Energy, Inc. , 962 S.W.2d 507, 528 (Tex. 1998). | 2 | 2 |
Cavnar v. Quality Control Parking, Inc.red2 sentences1998In Cavnar , we reasoned that "[t]he time has come to revise the prejudgment interest rule ... and restore equity and symmetry to this area of the law." Cavnar, 696 S.W.2d at 553-54 . 1998In Cavnar , we reasoned that “[t]he time has come to revise the prejudgment interest rule ... and restore equity and symmetry to this area of the law.” Cavnar, 696 S.W.2d at 553-54 . | 1 | 5 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
K Mart Corp. v. Rhyne
green
1 sentence2015As discussed by the Texas Supreme Court in Johnson, the rule allowing for recovery of prejudgment 'K Man. 932 S.W.2d at 146 . 6 Bevers, 909 S.W.2d at 603 . 7 /d. (noting that, "Nothing in [the prejudgment interest statute] requires the claimant to demand an exact amount or list every element of damage claimed in order to trigger the notice of claim provision.'') Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's 1Hotion to 1Hodify Judgment Page4 618 • • interest in personal injury cases "was driven primarily by the rationale that awarding prejudgment interest was necessary to fully compensate injured plainti | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Bevers v. Soule
green
1 sentence2015As discussed by the Texas Supreme Court in Johnson, the rule allowing for recovery of prejudgment 'K Man. 932 S.W.2d at 146 . 6 Bevers, 909 S.W.2d at 603 . 7 /d. (noting that, "Nothing in [the prejudgment interest statute] requires the claimant to demand an exact amount or list every element of damage claimed in order to trigger the notice of claim provision.'') Plaintiff's Response to Defendant's 1Hotion to 1Hodify Judgment Page4 618 • • interest in personal injury cases "was driven primarily by the rationale that awarding prejudgment interest was necessary to fully compensate injured plainti | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Mirta Zorrilla v. Aypco Construction II, LLC and Jose Luis Munoz
green
1 sentence2015Id. (citing Tex R. | 1 | 2015–2015 |
Schlipf v. Exxon Corp.
green
2 sentences2000Schlipf 644 S.W.2d at 454 . 2000Id. at 455 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
City of Houston v. Wolfe
green
1 sentence1989However, the State then points out the decision of the Court in City of Houston v. Wolfe, 712 S.W.2d 228 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1986, writ ref’d), in which the Court suggested that the Cavnar rationale extended to all types of cases and utilized that rationale to award a condemnee prejudgment interest on the amount by which the jury award in that condemnation suit exceeded the award of the special commissioners. | 1 | 1989–1989 |
Washington v. Walker County
green
2 sentences1986In our opinion Allright, Inc. v. Pearson is in conflict with the same court's decisions in Washington v. Walker County, supra , and Houston Lighting & Power Company v. Reynolds, supra , with respect to the necessity of preserving a point of error on appeal. 1986In our opinion Allright, Inc. v. Pearson is in conflict with the same court’s decisions in Washington v. Walker County, supra, and Houston Lighting & Power Company v. Reynolds, supra, with respect to the necessity of preserving a point of error on appeal. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. Reynolds
green
2 sentences1986In our opinion Allright, Inc. v. Pearson is in conflict with the same court's decisions in Washington v. Walker County, supra , and Houston Lighting & Power Company v. Reynolds, supra , with respect to the necessity of preserving a point of error on appeal. 1986In our opinion Allright, Inc. v. Pearson is in conflict with the same court’s decisions in Washington v. Walker County, supra, and Houston Lighting & Power Company v. Reynolds, supra, with respect to the necessity of preserving a point of error on appeal. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.