90 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 1966–2025 2 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Jackson v. Dennogreen2 sentences2019The Court finds that the questions permitted of Defendant Xavier Perez regarding the truth and content of the statement (State’s Exhibit No. 22) were permitted not to prove the truth of that exhibit but to assist the Court, if it did, (which it did) in testing the Defendant’s credibility as a witness for himself in the Jackson v. Denno hearing. [See 378 U.S. 368 (1964)]. 9 VI. 2015Issues for Review Issue 1 The trial court erred in “overruling” the Jackson v. Denno motion and in failing to make any finding that the statement of the accused was voluntary, and in failing to make or enter on the record any specific fact findings which would support a conclusion that the statement was voluntary. 2 RR 26 Issue 2 The trial court erred in admitting the statement of the accused into evidence before the jury over renewed objection. 4 RR 189. 8 Arguments and Authorities Under Issue 1— No Jackson v. Denno Findings The error in this case began with the court and counsel apparently c | 17 | 29 |
Dewberry v. Stategreen2 sentences2006Jackson , 378 U.S. at 276-77, 84 S. Ct. at 1780-81; Dewberry v. State , 4 S.W.3d 735, 747 (Tex. Crim. 2005Jackson, 378 U.S. at 376-77, 84 S.Ct. at 1780-81; Dewberry v. State, 4 S.W.3d 735, 747 (Tex.Crim.App.1999), cer t. denied, 529 U.S. 1131 , 120 S.Ct. 2008 , 146 L.Ed.2d 958 (2000). | 8 | 8 |
Lopez v. Stategreen2 sentences1966On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, Lopez v. State, 384 S.W.2d 345 , we incorporated the Jackson v. Denno rule and said: “In new trials arising hereunder and in future trials in this state where there is a fair question of voluntariness of a confession of the defendant, the trial judge shall grant to the defendant the opportunity to object to the use of said confession; shall grant a fair hearing before the Court on the issue of volun-tariness, and from all of the evidence and without regard to the truth or falsity of the confession, shall make a clear cut determination of t 1966On remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, Lopez v. State, 384 S.W.2d 345 , we incorporated the Jackson v. Denno rule and said: "In new trials arising hereunder and in future trials in this state where there is a fair question of voluntariness of a confession of the defendant, the trial judge shall grant to the defendant the opportunity to object to the use of said confession; shall grant a fair hearing before the Court on the issue of voluntariness and from all of the evidence and without regard to the truth or falsity of the confession, shall make a clear cut determination of the | 3 | 6 |
Avila v. Stategreen2 sentences2015Avila v. State, 856 S.W.2d 260, 262 (Tex.App.-El Paso 1993, no pet.). 2015Avila v. State, 856 S.W.2d 260, 262 (Tex.App.--El Paso 1993, no pet.). | 3 | 3 |
Sells v. Stategreen2 sentences2005Sells v. State , 121 S.W.3d 748, 767 (Tex. Crim. 2005Sells v. State, 121 S.W.3d 748, 767 (Tex. Crim. | 3 | 3 |
Green v. Stategreen2 sentences2005Dewberry , 4 S.W.3d at 747-48 ; see also Green v. State , 934 S.W.2d 92, 98-99 (Tex. Crim. 2002See Green v. State , 934 S.W.2d 92, 98-99 (Tex. Crim. | 3 | 3 |
Doby v. Stategreen2 sentences1993We believe the course to follow in this situation is to abate the appeal and remand the case to the trial court for a Jackson v. Denno hearing and the filing of specific finding of facts supporting the trial court’s decision on voluntariness. 1 Tex.R.App.P. 81; Doby v. State, 681 S.W.2d 759, 762 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1984, no pet.). 1988In ordering this belated Jackson v. Denno hearing, we relied on the rationale employed in Doby v. State, 681 S.W.2d 759 (Tex.App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 1984, no pet.) and TEX.R.APP.P. 81 as authority for entering such an order. | 2 | 3 |
Hughes v. Stategreen2 sentences1988Hughes v. State, 562 S.W.2d 857, 863 (Tex.Crim.App.1978), cer t. denied, 439 U.S. 998 , 99 S.Ct. 604 , 58 L.Ed.2d 674 (1978); Cammon v. State, 672 S.W.2d 845, 849 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1984, no pet.). *524 At the Jackson v. Denno hearing, the two officers involved in appellant’s interrogation substantially denied appellant’s assertions above. 1988Hughes v. State, 562 S.W.2d 857, 863 (Tex.Crim.App.1978), cer t. denied, 439 U.S. 998 , 99 S.Ct. 604 , 58 L.Ed.2d 674 (1978); Cammon v. State, 672 S.W.2d 845, 849 (Tex.App.—Corpus Christi 1984, no pet.). *524 At the Jackson v. Denno hearing, the two officers involved in appellant’s interrogation substantially denied appellant’s assertions above. | 2 | 3 |
Martinez v. Stategreen2 sentences2023Martinez v. State, 127 S.W.3d 792, 797 (Tex. Crim. 2008Martinez v. State , 127 S.W.3d 792, 797 (Tex. Crim. | 2 | 2 |
Hawkins v. Stategreen2 sentences1993Miniel v. State, 831 S.W.2d 310, 315 (Tex.Crim.App.), ce rt. denied, — U.S.-, 113 S.Ct. 245 , 121 L.Ed.2d 178 (1992); Hawkins v. State, 613 S.W.2d 720, 730-731 (Tex.Crim.App.), ce rt. denied, 454 U.S. 919 , 102 S.Ct. 422 , 70 L.Ed.2d 231 (1981); Nation v. State, 762 S.W.2d 290, 292 (Tex.App.—Beaumont 1988, no pet.). 1988Hawkins v. State, 613 S.W.2d 720, 731-32 (Tex.Crim.App.1981). | 2 | 2 |
Hawkins v. Stategreen2 sentences1988Hawkins v. State, 660 S.W.2d 65, 72 (Tex.Crim.App.1983). 1986Hawkins v. State, 660 S.W.2d 65 (Tex.Cr.App.1983); Kelly v. State, 621 S.W.2d 176 (Tex.Cr.App.1981). | 1 | 4 |
English v. Stategreen2 sentences1985Dykes v. State, 657 S.W.2d 796 (Tex.Cr.App.1983); Rumbaugh v. State, 629 S.W.2d 747 (Tex.Cr.App.1982); Moon v. State, 607 S.W.2d 569 (Tex.Cr.App.1980); English v. State, 592 S.W.2d 949, 952 (Tex.Cr.App.1980); cert. den. 449 U.S. 891 , 101 S.Ct. 254 , 66 L.Ed.2d 120 (1980). 1982English v. State, 592 S.W.2d 949 (Tex.Cr.App.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 891 , 101 S.Ct. 254 , 66 L.Ed.2d 120 (1980). | 1 | 3 |
Strickland v. Washingtongreen2 sentences2014The benchmark for evaluating an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is whether counsel’s conduct “so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 686 . 2004Under Strickland v. Washington , to prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, the applicant must show that (1) counsel’s performance was deficient by falling below an objective standard of reasonableness and (2) there is a probability sufficient to undermine the confidence in the outcome that but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2064 (1984); Bone v. State , 77 S.W.3d 828, 833 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 2 |
Fuller v. Stategreen1 sentence2025Fuller v. State, 253 S.W.3d 220, 232 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
State v. Ballardgreen1 sentence2005State v. Ballard , 987 S.W.2d 889, 891 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Welex a Div. of Halliburton Co. v. Broomgreen1 sentence2005See Sossamon v. State , 816 S.W.2d 340, 345 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Bone v. Stategreen1 sentence2004Under Strickland v. Washington , to prevail on an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, the applicant must show that (1) counsel’s performance was deficient by falling below an objective standard of reasonableness and (2) there is a probability sufficient to undermine the confidence in the outcome that but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different. 466 U.S. 668, 687 , 104 S. Ct. 2052, 2064 (1984); Bone v. State , 77 S.W.3d 828, 833 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
| Vrettos v. United Machine Specialties Corp.green | 1 | 1 |
Williamson v. Floridagreen2 sentences1999See Green v. State, 934 S.W.2d 92, 98-99 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1200 , 117 S.Ct. 1561 , 137 L.Ed.2d 707 (1997); Johnson v. State, 803 S.W.2d 272, 287 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2914 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1078 (1991), overruled on other grounds, Heitman v. State, 815 S.W.2d 681 (Tex.Crim.App.1991). 1999See Green v. State, 934 S.W.2d 92, 98-99 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1200 , 117 S.Ct. 1561 , 137 L.Ed.2d 707 (1997); Johnson v. State, 803 S.W.2d 272, 287 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2914 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1078 (1991), overruled on other *748 grounds, Heitman v. State, 815 S.W.2d 681 (Tex.Crim.App.1991). | 1 | 1 |
| Faust v. United Statesgreen | 1 | 1 |
Johnson v. Stategreen2 sentences1999See Green v. State, 934 S.W.2d 92, 98-99 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1200 , 117 S.Ct. 1561 , 137 L.Ed.2d 707 (1997); Johnson v. State, 803 S.W.2d 272, 287 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2914 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1078 (1991), overruled on other grounds, Heitman v. State, 815 S.W.2d 681 (Tex.Crim.App.1991). 1999See Green v. State, 934 S.W.2d 92, 98-99 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1200 , 117 S.Ct. 1561 , 137 L.Ed.2d 707 (1997); Johnson v. State, 803 S.W.2d 272, 287 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2914 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1078 (1991), overruled on other *748 grounds, Heitman v. State, 815 S.W.2d 681 (Tex.Crim.App.1991). | 1 | 1 |
| Bonham v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Miniel v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Nation v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Brooks v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Freeman v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Webb v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Howie Ray Robinson v. Henry Wade, Winfield Scott, Richard Mays and Bill Shawgreen | 1 | 1 |
| Leonard O. Diaz, Jr. v. T.C. Martin, Warden, Federal Correctional Institutiongreen | 1 | 1 |
| Dunn v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Butler v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Cammon v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Tague v. Louisianagreen | 1 | 1 |
| Myre v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Valerio v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Nash v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Lego v. Twomeygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Kincaid v. Stategreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Imperial Distributors, Inc. v. United States
green
2 sentences1985Dykes v. State, 657 S.W.2d 796 (Tex.Cr.App.1983); Rumbaugh v. State, 629 S.W.2d 747 (Tex.Cr.App.1982); Moon v. State, 607 S.W.2d 569 (Tex.Cr.App.1980); English v. State, 592 S.W.2d 949, 952 (Tex.Cr.App.1980); cert. den. 449 U.S. 891 , 101 S.Ct. 254 , 66 L.Ed.2d 120 (1980). 1982English v. State, 592 S.W.2d 949 (Tex.Cr.App.1980), cert. denied, 449 U.S. 891 , 101 S.Ct. 254 , 66 L.Ed.2d 120 (1980). | 3 | 1982–1985 |
Miranda v. Arizona
green
2 sentences2015Issues for Review Issue 1 The trial court erred in “overruling” the Jackson v. Denno motion and in failing to make any finding that the statement of the accused was voluntary, and in failing to make or enter on the record any specific fact findings which would support a conclusion that the statement was voluntary. 2 RR 26 Issue 2 The trial court erred in admitting the statement of the accused into evidence before the jury over renewed objection. 4 RR 189. 8 Arguments and Authorities Under Issue 1— No Jackson v. Denno Findings The error in this case began with the court and counsel apparently c 1988However, Sergeant McMillian and another Denver officer, Detective Diaz, who took the confession, each established without contradiction at a Jackson v. Denno hearing that appellant was fully apprised of her rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), before giving them her confession. | 2 | 1988–2015 |
North Carolina v. Butler
red
2 sentences1988As noted earlier, appellant's age, background, competency, education, experience, etc., was not developed at the Jackson v. Denno hearing, so any evidence of these matters must be gleaned from other parts of the record. [13] As Butler, supra, 441 U.S. at 373-375 , 99 S.Ct. at 1757-1758 , made clear, courts must presume a defendant did not waive his rights and the prosecution's burden is great but waiver can be inferred form words and actions of the person interrogated including background, experience and conduct. 1988As noted earlier, appellant's age, background, competency, education, experience, etc., was not developed at the Jackson v. Denno hearing, so any evidence of these matters must be gleaned from other parts of the record. [13] As Butler, supra, 441 U.S. at 373-375 , 99 S.Ct. at 1757-1758 , made clear, courts must presume a defendant did not waive his rights and the prosecution's burden is great but waiver can be inferred form words and actions of the person interrogated including background, experience and conduct. | 2 | 1980–1988 |
Edwards v. Arizona
green
2 sentences1985The Court of Criminal Appeals, in its July 24, 1985, opinion, cited Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 , 101 S.Ct. 1880 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981), and Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387 , 97 S.Ct. 1232 , 51 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977), which case involved the so called “Christian burial” speech. 1985The Court of Criminal Appeals, in its July 24, 1985, opinion, cited Edwards v. Arizona, 451 U.S. 477 , 101 S.Ct. 1880 , 68 L.Ed.2d 378 (1981), and Brewer v. Williams, 430 U.S. 387 , 97 S.Ct. 1232 , 51 L.Ed.2d 424 (1977), which case involved the so called “Christian burial” speech. | 2 | 1984–1985 |
Gigliobianco v. State
green
1 sentence2025Gigliobianco v. State, 210 S.W.3d 637 , 641–42 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Jackson v. State
green
1 sentence2014Jackson, 877 S.W.2d at 771 . 16 Appellant alleged that trial counsel was ineffective at the Jackson v. Denno hearing because he did not challenge the State’s evidence on voluntariness, including whether Appellant received Miranda warnings and whether Appellant’s level of intoxication vitiated any consent or any waiver of his Miranda rights. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Oursbourn v. State
green
1 sentence2014That omitted instruction therefore became “law of the 12 Oursbourn v. State, 259 S.W.3d 159 , 173–74 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
Ysleta del Sur Pueblo v. Laney
green
2 sentences2005Jackson, 378 U.S. at 376-77, 84 S.Ct. at 1780-81; Dewberry v. State, 4 S.W.3d 735, 747 (Tex. Crim.App.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1131 , 120 S.Ct. 2008 , 146 L.Ed.2d 958 (2000). 2005Jackson, 378 U.S. at 376-77, 84 S.Ct. at 1780-81; Dewberry v. State, 4 S.W.3d 735, 747 (Tex.Crim.App.1999), cer t. denied, 529 U.S. 1131 , 120 S.Ct. 2008 , 146 L.Ed.2d 958 (2000). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Dewberry v. Texas
green
2 sentences2005Jackson, 378 U.S. at 376-77, 84 S.Ct. at 1780-81; Dewberry v. State, 4 S.W.3d 735, 747 (Tex. Crim.App.1999), cert. denied, 529 U.S. 1131 , 120 S.Ct. 2008 , 146 L.Ed.2d 958 (2000). 2005Jackson, 378 U.S. at 376-77, 84 S.Ct. at 1780-81; Dewberry v. State, 4 S.W.3d 735, 747 (Tex.Crim.App.1999), cer t. denied, 529 U.S. 1131 , 120 S.Ct. 2008 , 146 L.Ed.2d 958 (2000). | 1 | 2005–2005 |
Bass v. State
green
2 sentences2000Id. at 771 . 2000Id. at 771 . | 1 | 2000–2000 |
| Nunez v. Costello green | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Heitman v. State
green
2 sentences1999See Green v. State, 934 S.W.2d 92, 98-99 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1200 , 117 S.Ct. 1561 , 137 L.Ed.2d 707 (1997); Johnson v. State, 803 S.W.2d 272, 287 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2914 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1078 (1991), overruled on other grounds, Heitman v. State, 815 S.W.2d 681 (Tex.Crim.App.1991). 1999See Green v. State, 934 S.W.2d 92, 98-99 (Tex.Crim.App.1996), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1200 , 117 S.Ct. 1561 , 137 L.Ed.2d 707 (1997); Johnson v. State, 803 S.W.2d 272, 287 (Tex.Crim.App.1990), cert. denied, 501 U.S. 1259 , 111 S.Ct. 2914 , 115 L.Ed.2d 1078 (1991), overruled on other *748 grounds, Heitman v. State, 815 S.W.2d 681 (Tex.Crim.App.1991). | 1 | 1999–1999 |
| Barney v. State green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| Hawkins v. Texas green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| Johnson v. Virginia green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| Miller v. Plantier green | 1 | 1993–1993 |
| Hearn v. State green | 1 | 1989–1989 |
| Burdine v. State green | 1 | 1989–1989 |
| Lamb v. State green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| Coleco Industries, Inc. v. Berman green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| Smith v. Bordenkircher green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| Shaw v. Neece green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| Fullard v. Florida green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| Aranda v. State green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| White v. State green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| Kelly v. State green | 1 | 1986–1986 |
| Johnson v. State green | 1 | 1986–1986 |
| Dykes v. State green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Moon v. State green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Brewer v. Williams green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Rumbaugh v. State green | 1 | 1985–1985 |
| Simmons v. United States green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Stone v. State green | 1 | 1984–1984 |
| Madden v. State green | 1 | 1983–1983 |
| Madden v. State green | 1 | 1983–1983 |
| Hobson v. State green | 1 | 1983–1983 |
| Page v. State green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| Watkins v. Sowders green | 1 | 1982–1982 |
| Alonzo v. State green | 1 | 1980–1980 |
| Fare v. Michael C. green | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.