12 Florida opinions name it 2 courts 1986–2020 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Florida courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Sanchez v. Hussey Seating Co.green2 sentences2020See also Sanchez v. Hussey Seating Co., 698 So. 2d 1326 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). 2015See also Sanchez v. Hussey Seating Co., 698 So.2d 1326 (Fla. 1st DCA 1997). | 2 | 2 |
Lavado v. Stategreen2 sentences1999As Judge Pearson pointed out in his dissent, "[i]f he knew nothing else about the prospective jurors, the single thing that defense counsel needed to know was whether the prospective jurors could fairly and impartially consider the defense of voluntary intoxication. " Lavado v. State, 469 So.2d 917, 919 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). [emphasis supplied] See Walker v. State, 724 So.2d at 1232 ; Chandler v. State, 744 So.2d at 1061 . 1986As Judge Pearson pointed out in his dissent, "[i]f he knew nothing else about the prospective jurors, the single thing that defense counsel needed to know was whether the prospective jurors could fairly and impartially consider the defense of voluntary intoxication." 469 So.2d at 919 . | 1 | 2 |
Lavado v. Stategreen2 sentences1999See Lavado, 492 So.2d at 1323 . 1997Lavado, 492 So.2d at 1323 . | 1 | 2 |
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. Caseyred2 sentences2017See Casey, 505 U.S. at 877 , 112 S.Ct. 2791 . 2017See Casey, 505 U.S. at 877 . | 1 | 1 |
Cook v. Stategreen1 sentence2012Cook v. State, 595 So.2d 994, 995-96 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992). | 1 | 1 |
Cobb v. Stategreen1 sentence2006See, e.g., Millett v. State, 460 So.2d 489, 493 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) ("When faced with a situation in which harmless error may apply, our task is to determine whether `the error committed was so prejudicial as to vitiate the entire trial.'" (quoting Cobb v. State, 376 So.2d 230, 232 (Fla.1979))). | 1 | 1 |
Millett v. Stategreen1 sentence2006See, e.g., Millett v. State, 460 So.2d 489, 493 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984) ("When faced with a situation in which harmless error may apply, our task is to determine whether `the error committed was so prejudicial as to vitiate the entire trial.'" (quoting Cobb v. State, 376 So.2d 230, 232 (Fla.1979))). | 1 | 1 |
Coney v. Stategreen1 sentence2001See Coney v. State, 348 So.2d 672 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977) (finding that the trial court did not commit error in restricting repetitious questions to the prospective jurors upon voir dire examination). | 1 | 1 |
Smith v. Stategreen1 sentence1992See Smith v. State, 578 So.2d 366 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Smith v. State, 525 So.2d 477 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Brown v. State, 426 So.2d 76 ; Anderson v. State, 314 So.2d 803 (3d DCA 1975), cert. denied, 330 So.2d 21 (Fla. 1976). | 1 | 1 |
Daniel v. Maygreen1 sentence1989Daniel v. May, 143 So.2d 536, 538 (Fla. 2d DCA 1962). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Florida. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Walker v. State
green
1 sentence1999As Judge Pearson pointed out in his dissent, "[i]f he knew nothing else about the prospective jurors, the single thing that defense counsel needed to know was whether the prospective jurors could fairly and impartially consider the defense of voluntary intoxication. " Lavado v. State, 469 So.2d 917, 919 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). [emphasis supplied] See Walker v. State, 724 So.2d at 1232 ; Chandler v. State, 744 So.2d at 1061 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Chandler v. State
green
1 sentence1999As Judge Pearson pointed out in his dissent, "[i]f he knew nothing else about the prospective jurors, the single thing that defense counsel needed to know was whether the prospective jurors could fairly and impartially consider the defense of voluntary intoxication. " Lavado v. State, 469 So.2d 917, 919 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985). [emphasis supplied] See Walker v. State, 724 So.2d at 1232 ; Chandler v. State, 744 So.2d at 1061 . | 1 | 1999–1999 |
Anderson v. State
neutral
1 sentence1992See Smith v. State, 578 So.2d 366 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Smith v. State, 525 So.2d 477 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Brown v. State, 426 So.2d 76 ; Anderson v. State, 314 So.2d 803 (3d DCA 1975), cert. denied, 330 So.2d 21 (Fla. 1976). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Smith v. State
green
1 sentence1992See Smith v. State, 578 So.2d 366 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Smith v. State, 525 So.2d 477 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Brown v. State, 426 So.2d 76 ; Anderson v. State, 314 So.2d 803 (3d DCA 1975), cert. denied, 330 So.2d 21 (Fla. 1976). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Brown v. State
green
1 sentence1992See Smith v. State, 578 So.2d 366 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991); Smith v. State, 525 So.2d 477 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Brown v. State, 426 So.2d 76 ; Anderson v. State, 314 So.2d 803 (3d DCA 1975), cert. denied, 330 So.2d 21 (Fla. 1976). | 1 | 1992–1992 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.