routine standard in Georgia

12 Georgia opinions name it 2 courts 1987–2018 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Georgia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (8)

Case	Followed	Cited
Bazemore v. Stategreen ga · 2000 · cited in 6 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2004–2018 2 sentences 2018See also Bazemore v. State , 273 Ga. 160 , 162 (1), 535 S.E.2d 760 (2000) ("Certainly, evidence of a routine or standard practice or procedure can be used in demonstrating compliance with constitutional standards."). 2018See also Bazemore v. State , 273 Ga. 160 , 162 (1), 535 S.E.2d 760 (2000) ("Certainly, evidence of a routine or standard practice or procedure can be used in demonstrating compliance with constitutional standards.").	6	6
Jackson v. Hoppergreen ga · 1979 · cited in 3 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1999–2012 2 sentences 2012Bazemore v. State, 273 Ga. 160, 162 (1) ( 535 SE2d 760 ) (2000); Jackson v. Hopper, 243 Ga. 41, 42 ( 252 SE2d 467 ) (1979). 2012Bazemore v. State, 273 Ga. 160, 162 (1) ( 535 SE2d 760 ) (2000); Jackson v. Hopper, 243 Ga. 41, 42 ( 252 SE2d 467 ) (1979).	3	3
Clark v. Stategreen gactapp · 2010 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 2 sentences 2012Thus, we find that the initial stop, as well as the brief detention, was authorized. 7 Davis, supra at 321-322 (1); Accord Clark v. State, 305 Ga. App. 699, 700 (1) ( 700 SE2d 682 ) (2010) (“A seat belt violation - including a motorist’s failure to use a shoulder strap - is a proper basis for a traffic stop”) (citations omitted). 8 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Davis v. State, supra at 322 (1); Rogers v. State, 206 Ga. App. 654, 657 (2) ( 426 SE2d 209 ) (1992). 9 Davis, supra; Rogers, supra. 5 2. 2012Thus, we find that the initial stop, as well as the brief detention, was authorized. 7 Davis, supra at 321-322 (1); Accord Clark v. State, 305 Ga. App. 699, 700 (1) ( 700 SE2d 682 ) (2010) (“A seat belt violation - including a motorist’s failure to use a shoulder strap - is a proper basis for a traffic stop”) (citations omitted). 8 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Davis v. State, supra at 322 (1); Rogers v. State, 206 Ga. App. 654, 657 (2) ( 426 SE2d 209 ) (1992). 9 Davis, supra; Rogers, supra. 5 2.	1	1
Rogers v. Stategreen gactapp · 1992 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2012–2012 2 sentences 2012Thus, we find that the initial stop, as well as the brief detention, was authorized. 7 Davis, supra at 321-322 (1); Accord Clark v. State, 305 Ga. App. 699, 700 (1) ( 700 SE2d 682 ) (2010) (“A seat belt violation - including a motorist’s failure to use a shoulder strap - is a proper basis for a traffic stop”) (citations omitted). 8 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Davis v. State, supra at 322 (1); Rogers v. State, 206 Ga. App. 654, 657 (2) ( 426 SE2d 209 ) (1992). 9 Davis, supra; Rogers, supra. 5 2. 2012Thus, we find that the initial stop, as well as the brief detention, was authorized. 7 Davis, supra at 321-322 (1); Accord Clark v. State, 305 Ga. App. 699, 700 (1) ( 700 SE2d 682 ) (2010) (“A seat belt violation - including a motorist’s failure to use a shoulder strap - is a proper basis for a traffic stop”) (citations omitted). 8 (Citations and punctuation omitted.) Davis v. State, supra at 322 (1); Rogers v. State, 206 Ga. App. 654, 657 (2) ( 426 SE2d 209 ) (1992). 9 Davis, supra; Rogers, supra. 5 2.	1	1
Mobley v. Stategreen ga · 1995 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2011–2011 2 sentences 2011Although Rudolph claims that his testimony proves otherwise, “it is the function of the trial court at the hearing on the motion for new trial to determine witness credibility and to resolve conflicts in the testimony.” (Citation omitted.) Mobley v. State, 264 Ga. 854, 856 (2) ( 452 SE2d 500 ) (1995). 2011Although Rudolph claims that his testimony proves otherwise, “it is the function of the trial court at the hearing on the motion for new trial to determine witness credibility and to resolve conflicts in the testimony.” (Citation omitted.) Mobley v. State, 264 Ga. 854, 856 (2) ( 452 SE2d 500 ) (1995).	1	1
Allison v. Stategreen gactapp · 2007 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2009–2009 2 sentences 2009See Bazemore v. State, 273 Ga. 160, 162 (1) ( 535 SE2d 760 ) (2000) (“Certainly, evidence of a routine or standard practice or procedure can be used in demonstrating compliance with constitutional standards.”); Allison v. State, 288 Ga. App. 482, 486 (2) ( 654 SE2d 628 ) (2007) (the state can rely upon testimony concerning routine or standard practices to establish that a defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his constitutional rights). 2009See Bazemore v. State, 273 Ga. 160, 162 (1) ( 535 SE2d 760 ) (2000) (“Certainly, evidence of a routine or standard practice or procedure can be used in demonstrating compliance with constitutional standards.”); Allison v. State, 288 Ga. App. 482, 486 (2) ( 654 SE2d 628 ) (2007) (the state can rely upon testimony concerning routine or standard practices to establish that a defendant knowingly and voluntarily waived his constitutional rights).	1	1
Foskey v. Battlegreen ga · 2004 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 2005–2005 1 sentence 2005Therefore, the State’s proof is sufficient with respect to “only one of the three constitutional rights mentioned in Boykin , and ‘fell well short of demonstrating that [Baisden] was fully informed of the constitutional rights he was waiving by pleading guilty.’ [Cit.]” Foskey v. Battle, supra at 482.	1	1
King v. Stategreen gactapp · 1982 · cited in 1 Georgia opinions naming this issue, 1987–1987 2 sentences 1987See King v. State, 161 Ga. App. 382 (1) ( 288 SE2d 644 ). 1987See King v. State, 161 Ga. App. 382 (1) ( 288 SE2d 644 ).	1	1

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Georgia. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (2)

Case	Cited	Years
Boyt v. State green gactapp · 2007 1 sentence 2011It is also worth noting that a routine instruction on prior consistent statements is discouraged in federal practice, see Boyt, 286 Ga. App. at 467-468 , and Georgia courts will soon be operating under a prior consistent statements rule that parallels Federal Rule of Evidence 801 (d) (1).	1	2011–2011
Parks v. McClung green ga · 1999 2 sentences 2000"Evidence of a routine or standard procedure can be used to establish a waiver of the right to counsel. [Cit.]" Parks v. McClung, 271 Ga. 795 , 796 n. 4, 524 S.E.2d 718 (1999). 2000"Evidence of a routine or standard procedure can be used to establish a waiver of the right to counsel. [Cit.]" Parks v. McClung, 271 Ga. 795 , 796 n. 4, 524 S.E.2d 718 (1999).	1	2000–2000

Where else courts name it

IL 24 (1965–2022) CA 23 (1967–2025) MO 22 (2005–2023) GA 12 (1987–2018) NY 8 (1958–2003) MA 8 (1992–2025) KS 7 (1978–2025) MD 7 (1994–2016) TX 7 (1990–2018) DC 7 (1986–2023) PA 4 (1995–2018) IN 3 (1981–2013) FL 3 (1993–1997) NM 2 (2000–2001) NC 2 (1902–2026) OH 2 (1988–1992) AL 2 (2005–2012)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check