12 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1894–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Easton v. Howardgreen2 sentences2021“The purpose of [JNOV] is to allow the district court an opportunity to correct any error in failing to direct a verdict.” Easton v. Howard, 751 N.W.2d 1, 4 (Iowa 2008). 2020Scope and Standard of Review “The purpose of [JNOV] is to allow the district court an opportunity to correct any error in failing to direct a verdict.” Easton v. Howard, 751 N.W.2d 1, 4 (Iowa 2008). | 5 | 5 |
Meeker v. City of Clintongreen2 sentences2008Bangs v. Maple Hills, Ltd., 585 N.W.2d 262, 268 (Iowa 1998); Meeker v. City of Clinton, 259 N.W.2d 822, 827 (Iowa 1977). 2008Bangs v. Maple Hills, Ltd., 585 N.W.2d 262, 268 (Iowa 1998); Meeker v. City of Clinton, 259 N.W.2d 822, 827 (Iowa 1977). | 3 | 3 |
Bangs v. Maple Hills, Ltd.green2 sentences2008Bangs v. Maple Hills, Ltd., 585 N.W.2d 262, 268 (Iowa 1998); Meeker v. City of Clinton, 259 N.W.2d 822, 827 (Iowa 1977). 2008Bangs v. Maple Hills, Ltd., 585 N.W.2d 262, 268 (Iowa 1998); Meeker v. City of Clinton, 259 N.W.2d 822, 827 (Iowa 1977). | 3 | 3 |
Dennis L. Smith v. Iowa State University of Science and Technology and State of Iowagreen1 sentence2021“Our role is to decide whether there was sufficient evidence to justify submitting the case to the jury when viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.” Smith v. Iowa State Univ. of Sci. & Tech., 851 N.W.2d 1, 18 (Iowa 2014) (citation omitted). | 1 | 1 |
Rife v. D.T. Corner, Inc.green1 sentence2019Corner, Inc., 641 N.W.2d 761, 767 (Iowa 2002). | 1 | 1 |
Meier v. SENECAUT IIIgreen1 sentence2019“It is a fundamental doctrine of appellate review that issues must ordinarily be both raised and decided by the district court before we will decide them on appeal.” Meier v. Senecaut, 641 N.W.2d 532, 537 (Iowa 2002). “[A] motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict serves to afford the district court an opportunity to correct any error in failing to direct a verdict.” Rife v. D.T. | 1 | 1 |
Konicek v. Loomis Bros., Inc.green1 sentence2017Regardless of who has the burden of proof, the relevant inquiry is “was there sufficient evidence to generate a jury question?” Konicek v. Loomis Bros., Inc., 457 N.W.2d 614, 617 (Iowa 1990); see Royal Indem. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Reese
green
1 sentence1980State v. Reese, 259 N.W.2d at 775 . | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Christensen v. Thompson
neutral
2 sentences1977The defendant also contends that he could not have made a motion to strike in this case, and cites State v. Nathoo, 152 Iowa 665, 673 , 133 N.W. 129, 132 ; State v. Rutledge, 135 Iowa 581 , 113 N.W. 461, 464 ; *776 and Christensen v. Thompson, 123 Iowa 717 , 99 N.W. 591 , all of which hold that a party to an action cannot move to strike an answer on the grounds that it is not responsive to the question unless the motion is put by the interrogator. 1977The defendant also contends that he could not have made a motion to strike in this case, and cites State v. Nathoo, 152 Iowa 665, 673 , 133 N.W. 129, 132 ; State v. Rutledge, 135 Iowa 581 , 113 N.W. 461, 464 ; *776 and Christensen v. Thompson, 123 Iowa 717 , 99 N.W. 591 , all of which hold that a party to an action cannot move to strike an answer on the grounds that it is not responsive to the question unless the motion is put by the interrogator. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
State v. Rutledge
green
2 sentences1977The defendant also contends that he could not have made a motion to strike in this case, and cites State v. Nathoo, 152 Iowa 665, 673 , 133 N.W. 129, 132 ; State v. Rutledge, 135 Iowa 581 , 113 N.W. 461, 464 ; *776 and Christensen v. Thompson, 123 Iowa 717 , 99 N.W. 591 , all of which hold that a party to an action cannot move to strike an answer on the grounds that it is not responsive to the question unless the motion is put by the interrogator. 1977The defendant also contends that he could not have made a motion to strike in this case, and cites State v. Nathoo, 152 Iowa 665, 673 , 133 N.W. 129, 132 ; State v. Rutledge, 135 Iowa 581 , 113 N.W. 461, 464 ; *776 and Christensen v. Thompson, 123 Iowa 717 , 99 N.W. 591 , all of which hold that a party to an action cannot move to strike an answer on the grounds that it is not responsive to the question unless the motion is put by the interrogator. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
State v. Nathoo
green
2 sentences1977The defendant also contends that he could not have made a motion to strike in this case, and cites State v. Nathoo, 152 Iowa 665, 673 , 133 N.W. 129, 132 ; State v. Rutledge, 135 Iowa 581 , 113 N.W. 461, 464 ; *776 and Christensen v. Thompson, 123 Iowa 717 , 99 N.W. 591 , all of which hold that a party to an action cannot move to strike an answer on the grounds that it is not responsive to the question unless the motion is put by the interrogator. 1977The defendant also contends that he could not have made a motion to strike in this case, and cites State v. Nathoo, 152 Iowa 665, 673 , 133 N.W. 129, 132 ; State v. Rutledge, 135 Iowa 581 , 113 N.W. 461, 464 ; *776 and Christensen v. Thompson, 123 Iowa 717 , 99 N.W. 591 , all of which hold that a party to an action cannot move to strike an answer on the grounds that it is not responsive to the question unless the motion is put by the interrogator. | 1 | 1977–1977 |
Rosenbaum Bros. v. Partch
neutral
1 sentence1894McDermott v. Railway Co., 85 Iowa, 191 ; 52 N. W. | 1 | 1894–1894 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.