12 Idaho opinions name it 1 courts 1914–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Idaho courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Suitts v. Nixgreen2 sentences2019"This Court adheres to the rule that persons acting pro se are held to the same standards and rules as those represented by attorneys." Huff v. Singleton , 143 Idaho 498 , 500, 148 P.3d 1244 , 1246 (2006) (citing Suitts v. Nix , 141 Idaho 706 , 709, 117 P.3d 120 , 123 (2005) ). 2019"This Court adheres to the rule that persons acting pro se are held to the same standards and rules as those represented by attorneys." Huff v. Singleton , 143 Idaho 498 , 500, 148 P.3d 1244 , 1246 (2006) (citing Suitts v. Nix , 141 Idaho 706 , 709, 117 P.3d 120 , 123 (2005) ). | 5 | 6 |
Pearl v. BPD OF IDAHO STATE BD. OF MEDICINEgreen2 sentences2007Pearl v. Bd. of Prof'l Discipline, 137 Idaho 107, 112 , 44 P.3d 1162, 1167 (2002). 2007Pearl v. Bd. of Prof'l Discipline, 137 Idaho 107, 112 , 44 P.3d 1162, 1167 (2002). | 2 | 2 |
Huff v. Singletongreen2 sentences2019"This Court adheres to the rule that persons acting pro se are held to the same standards and rules as those represented by attorneys." Huff v. Singleton , 143 Idaho 498 , 500, 148 P.3d 1244 , 1246 (2006) (citing Suitts v. Nix , 141 Idaho 706 , 709, 117 P.3d 120 , 123 (2005) ). 2019"This Court adheres to the rule that persons acting pro se are held to the same standards and rules as those represented by attorneys." Huff v. Singleton , 143 Idaho 498 , 500, 148 P.3d 1244 , 1246 (2006) (citing Suitts v. Nix , 141 Idaho 706 , 709, 117 P.3d 120 , 123 (2005) ). | 1 | 4 |
Salmon Rivers Sportsman Camps, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft Co.green2 sentences2007Additionally, this Court adheres to the rule that “privity of contract is required in a contract action to recover economic loss for breach of implied warranty.” Salmon Rivers Sportsman Camps, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 97 Idaho 348, 354 , 544 P.2d 306, 312 (1975). 2007Additionally, this Court adheres to the rule that “privity of contract is required in a contract action to recover economic loss for breach of implied warranty.” Salmon Rivers Sportsman Camps, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft Co., 97 Idaho 348, 354 , 544 P.2d 306, 312 (1975). | 1 | 1 |
Davisco Foods International, Inc. v. Gooding Countygreen2 sentences2007As I explained in Section II of my dissent in Davisco Foods Intern. v. Gooding County, 141 Idaho 784, 794-5 , 118 P.3d 116, 126-7 (2005): The Court adheres to the rule that under the APA, when an agency’s findings disagree with the hearing officer’s recommended order, the reviewing court still examines the agency’s findings and whether they are supported by substantial evidence. 2007As I explained in Section II of my dissent in Davisco Foods Intern. v. Gooding County, 141 Idaho 784, 794-5 , 118 P.3d 116, 126-7 (2005): The Court adheres to the rule that under the APA, when an agency’s findings disagree with the hearing officer’s recommended order, the reviewing court still examines the agency’s findings and whether they are supported by substantial evidence. | 1 | 1 |
Row v. Stategreen2 sentences2001See Row v. State, 135 Idaho 573, 580 , 21 P.3d 895, 902 (2001). 2001See Row v. State, 135 Idaho 573, 580 , 21 P.3d 895, 902 (2001). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Idaho. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Caesar v. State
green
2 sentences1993In Caesar v. State, 101 Idaho 158 , 610 P.2d 517 (1980), the Court said: Where it can be inferred from a state statute that the state has intended to fully occupy or preempt a particular area, to the exclusion of [local governmental entities], a [local] ordinance in that area will be held to be in conflict with the state law, even if the state law does not so specifically state. 1993In Caesar v. State, 101 Idaho 158 , 610 P.2d 517 (1980), the Court said: Where it can be inferred from a state statute that the state has intended to fully occupy or preempt a particular area, to the exclusion of [local governmental entities], a [local] ordinance in that area will be held to be in conflict with the state law, even if the state law does not so specifically state. | 1 | 1993–1993 |
State v. Seymour
green
2 sentences1914In the case of Oxier v. United States, 1 Ind. Ter. 91, 38 S. W. 332 , Judge Lewis says: “The later and the sounder and better rule is believed to be that which makes the presumption, arising from the possession of recently stolen property, not a presumption of law, but of fact; in other words, an inference to be drawn or not, as the jury may determine in the light of all the evidence. ’ ’ ’ ‘ ‘ This court cites with approval in this connection the ease of Blair v. Territory, 15 Old. 550, 82 Pac. 653 , and holds: ‘The instruction complained of was upon the weight of the evidence, which is for t 1914In the case of Oxier v. United States, 1 Ind. Ter. 91, 38 S. W. 332 , Judge Lewis says: “The later and the sounder and better rule is believed to be that which makes the presumption, arising from the possession of recently stolen property, not a presumption of law, but of fact; in other words, an inference to be drawn or not, as the jury may determine in the light of all the evidence. ’ ’ ’ ‘ ‘ This court cites with approval in this connection the ease of Blair v. Territory, 15 Old. 550, 82 Pac. 653 , and holds: ‘The instruction complained of was upon the weight of the evidence, which is for t | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Blair v. Territory of Oklahoma
green
1 sentence1914In the case of Oxier v. United States, 1 Ind. Ter. 91, 38 S. W. 332 , Judge Lewis says: “The later and the sounder and better rule is believed to be that which makes the presumption, arising from the possession of recently stolen property, not a presumption of law, but of fact; in other words, an inference to be drawn or not, as the jury may determine in the light of all the evidence. ’ ’ ’ ‘ ‘ This court cites with approval in this connection the ease of Blair v. Territory, 15 Old. 550, 82 Pac. 653 , and holds: ‘The instruction complained of was upon the weight of the evidence, which is for t | 1 | 1914–1914 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.