adheres principle in South Carolina

6 South Carolina opinions name it 1 courts 1929–1985 0 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by South Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (0)

Case	Followed	Cited
No positive-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina.

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

Case	Negative	Cited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in South Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (6)

Case	Cited	Years
Elam v. Elam green sc · 1980 2 sentences 1985"While this court adheres to the principle of stare decisis , it should not be applied to `effect a petrifying rigidity' in common law." Elam v. Elam , 275 S.C. 132, 137 , 268 S.E. (2d) 109 (1980). 1985“While this court adheres to the principle of stare decisis, it should not be applied to ‘effect a petrifying rigidity’ in common law.” Elam v. Elam, 275 S. C. 132, 137, 268 S. E. (2d) 109 (1980).	2	1985–1985
Brown Ex Rel. Estate of Brown v. Anderson County Hospital Ass'n green sc · 1977 2 sentences 1980Id. at 486 , 234 S.E. (2d) 873 . 1980Id. at 486 , 234 S.E. (2d) 873 .	1	1980–1980
Wade v. Gore green sc · 1930 1 sentence 1935The Court adheres to the rule laid down in the case of Wade v. Gore et al., 154 S. C,. 262, 151 S. E., 470 .	1	1935–1935
Furman v. A. C. Tuxbury Land & Timber Co. green · 1919 1 sentence 1932Tuxbury Land & Timber Co., 112 S. C., 71, 99 S. E., 111, 113 , wherein the Court held that “the allegation of the greater *55 wrong includes the lesser.” The Court adheres to the principle stated in the above-mentioned case, Furman v. Tuxbury.	1	1932–1932
Mull v. Touchberry green sc · 1919 2 sentences 1929“The appellant argues that the rule we have stated shuts the defendant up to confine his defense to- an express warranty; but the defendant shut himself up when he alleged the parties made, a particular agreement.” Mull v. Touchberry, 112 S. C., at page 424, 100 S. E., 152 ; Again, in 1921, in a unanimous opinion, this Court adheres to the rule laid down in the Mull v. Touchberry case, supra. “* * * The exceptions shall not be long or argumentative in form. 1929“But, waiving such objections, they cannot, be sustained, for the reason that an action cannot be maintained both upon an express and an implied warranty (Mull v. Touchberry, 112 S. C., 422, 100 S. E., 152 ).” Simmons et al. v. Roanoke City Mills, 116 S. C., 432, 107 S. E., 903 , at page 904.	1	1929–1929
Simmons v. Roanoke City Mills green sc · 1921 1 sentence 1929“But, waiving such objections, they cannot, be sustained, for the reason that an action cannot be maintained both upon an express and an implied warranty (Mull v. Touchberry, 112 S. C., 422, 100 S. E., 152 ).” Simmons et al. v. Roanoke City Mills, 116 S. C., 432, 107 S. E., 903 , at page 904.	1	1929–1929

Where else courts name it

AL 13 (1922–2014) ID 12 (1914–2019) OK 11 (1909–1988) OH 11 (1998–2008) MT 9 (1963–2012) NE 8 (1948–1998) KS 8 (1935–2012) FL 8 (2002–2014) KY 7 (1893–1973) IL 7 (1962–2022) WI 6 (1962–2007) SC 6 (1929–1985) WA 5 (1917–1984) WY 5 (2004–2011) IN 5 (1971–1999) CT 4 (1973–1990) AR 4 (1927–2007) PA 4 (1910–2025) MS 3 (1964–1966) OR 3 (1910–1995) MI 3 (1988–1997) NY 3 (1936–1984) RI 3 (2008–2011) ME 3 (2014–2022) NJ 3 (1949–1990) TN 2 (1977–1993) TX 2 (1935–1982) UT 2 (1938–2004) DC 2 (2002–2004) MD 2 (2000–2011) WV 2 (1997–2017)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check