Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
505 Texas opinions name it 4 courts 1941–2026 104 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Anders v. Californiagreen2 sentences2026Woods’s appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw, along with a supporting brief, stating the record presents no reversible error and requesting permission to withdraw from his representation of Woods under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). 2026Woods’s appointed counsel filed a motion to withdraw, along with a supporting brief, stating the record presents no reversible error and requesting permission to withdraw from his representation of Woods under Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). | 484 | 494 |
High v. Stategreen2 sentences2026In compliance with High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978), counsel has discussed why, under the controlling authorities, the record presents no reversible error. 2026In compliance with High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807, 813 (Tex. Crim. App. [Panel Op.] 1978), counsel has discussed why, under the controlling authorities, the record presents no reversible error. | 12 | 12 |
In re D.A.S.green2 sentences2024See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); In re D.A.S., 973 S.W.2d 296, 299 (Tex. 1998) (holding that Anders procedures apply to juvenile appeals). 2024See Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); see also In re D.A.S., 973 S.W.2d 296, 299 (Tex. 1998) (holding Anders procedures apply to juvenile appeals). | 2 | 2 |
In Re Schulmangreen1 sentence2023See Anders, 386 U.S. at 741–42; In re Schulman, 252 S.W.3d 403, 406 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Bledsoe v. Stategreen1 sentence2009See Bledsoe v. State , 178 S.W.3d 824 , 826–27 (Tex. Crim. | 1 | 1 |
Ramirez v. Ackergreen2 sentences1941See Ramirez v. Acker, 134 Texas 647 , 138 S. W. (2d) 1054 . 4 Counsel for Moneada further contend that the Court of Civil Appeals erred in holding that the record failed to show that the question of insurance was injected into the trial, either through the Houston Post publication or through the conduct of Snyder’s counsel; because the argument of Snyder’s counsel, coupled with the article which was published in the Houston Post on the morning the case was submitted to the jury, together with the amount of damages awarded to Snyder for the injuries received by him, when considered with the ans 1941See Ramirez v. Acker, 134 Texas 647 , 138 S. W. (2d) 1054 . 4 Counsel for Moneada further contend that the Court of Civil Appeals erred in holding that the record failed to show that the question of insurance was injected into the trial, either through the Houston Post publication or through the conduct of Snyder’s counsel; because the argument of Snyder’s counsel, coupled with the article which was published in the Houston Post on the morning the case was submitted to the jury, together with the amount of damages awarded to Snyder for the injuries received by him, when considered with the ans | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.