record adequately supports claim (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

record adequately supports claim in Connecticut

86 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1974–2021 1 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (12)

CaseFollowedCited
State v. Evansgreen
conn · 1973 · cited in 67 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1974–2021
2 sentences

2021The second ‘exceptional circumstance’ may arise where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitu- tional right and a fair trial.’’ (Citation omitted.) State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973); see State v. Vars, 154 Conn. 255 , 269–72, 224 A.2d 744 (1966) (holding that new constitutional claims need not be preserved at trial to be raised on appeal but not addressing whether such claims must be raised in initial brief on appeal).

2021The second ‘exceptional circumstance’ may arise where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitu- tional right and a fair trial.’’ (Citation omitted.) State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973); see State v. Vars, 154 Conn. 255 , 269–72, 224 A.2d 744 (1966) (holding that new constitutional claims need not be preserved at trial to be raised on appeal but not addressing whether such claims must be raised in initial brief on appeal).

267
State v. Preyergreen
conn · 1985 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1986–1990
2 sentences

1986This court reaches the merits of issues not raised below only where the trial court has committed plain error; Practice Book § 3063; where “a new constitutional right not readily foreseeable has arisen between the time of trial and appeal”; State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973); or where “the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” Id.; see State v. Preyer, 198 Conn. 190 , 502 A.2d 858 (1985).

1986This court reaches the merits of issues not raised below only where the trial court has committed plain error; Practice Book § 3063; where “a new constitutional right not readily foreseeable has arisen between the time of trial and appeal”; State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973); or where “the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” Id.; see State v. Preyer, 198 Conn. 190 , 502 A.2d 858 (1985).

23
State v. Goldinggreen
conn · 1989 · cited in 5 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1990–2011
2 sentences

2011See State v. Golding, supra, 213 Conn. at 238-39 , 567 A.2d 823 (explaining "exceptional" circumstance presented by unpreserved claim of constitutional violation if record sufficient for review); see also State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973) (predecessor to Golding identified "`exceptional circumstance'" that arises when "the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial").

2011See State v. Golding, supra, 213 Conn. at 238-39 , 567 A.2d 823 (explaining "exceptional" circumstance presented by unpreserved claim of constitutional violation if record sufficient for review); see also State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973) (predecessor to Golding identified "`exceptional circumstance'" that arises when "the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial").

15
State v. Varsgreen
conn · 1966 · cited in 4 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1976–2021
2 sentences

2021The second ‘exceptional circumstance’ may arise where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitu- tional right and a fair trial.’’ (Citation omitted.) State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973); see State v. Vars, 154 Conn. 255 , 269–72, 224 A.2d 744 (1966) (holding that new constitutional claims need not be preserved at trial to be raised on appeal but not addressing whether such claims must be raised in initial brief on appeal).

2021The second ‘exceptional circumstance’ may arise where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitu- tional right and a fair trial.’’ (Citation omitted.) State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973); see State v. Vars, 154 Conn. 255 , 269–72, 224 A.2d 744 (1966) (holding that new constitutional claims need not be preserved at trial to be raised on appeal but not addressing whether such claims must be raised in initial brief on appeal).

14
State v. Plourdegreen
conn · 1988 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1989–1989
2 sentences

1989While we do not ordinarily review claims not raised below, we have recognized an exception “where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973); see State v. Plourde, 208 Conn. 455, 462 , 545 A.2d 1071 (1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1034 , 109 S. Ct. 847 , 102 L.

1989While we do not ordinarily review claims not raised below, we have recognized an exception “where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973); see State v. Plourde, 208 Conn. 455, 462 , 545 A.2d 1071 (1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1034 , 109 S. Ct. 847 , 102 L.

11
Connecticut v. Plourdegreen
scotus · 1989 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1989–1989
1 sentence

1989While we do not ordinarily review claims not raised below, we have recognized an exception “where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973); see State v. Plourde, 208 Conn. 455, 462 , 545 A.2d 1071 (1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1034 , 109 S. Ct. 847 , 102 L.

11
California v. Radkegreen
scotus · 1989 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1989–1989
1 sentence

1989While we do not ordinarily review claims not raised below, we have recognized an exception “where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973); see State v. Plourde, 208 Conn. 455, 462 , 545 A.2d 1071 (1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1034 , 109 S. Ct. 847 , 102 L.

11
State v. Vinalgreen
conn · 1986 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1986–1986
11
State v. Briggsgreen
conn · 1979 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1985–1985
11
State v. Rodriguezgreen
conn · 1980 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1983–1983
11
State v. Crawfordgreen
conn · 1976 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1977–1977
11
State v. Malleygreen
conn · 1974 · cited in 1 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 1976–1976
11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (53)

CaseCitedYears
State v. Torrence green
conn · 1985
2 sentences

1987Rather, “[o]nce it has been established that the record adequately supports a claim that a defendant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial . . . the merits of the claim must be determined.” (Emphasis added.) State v. Torrence, 196 Conn. 430, 435 , 493 A.2d 865 (1985).

1987Rather, “[o]nce it has been established that the record adequately supports a claim that a defendant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial . . . the merits of the claim must be determined.” (Emphasis added.) State v. Torrence, 196 Conn. 430, 435 , 493 A.2d 865 (1985).

31985–1987
State v. Smith green
conn · 1986
2 sentences

1989State v. Smith, 200 Conn. 465, 475 , 512 A.2d 189 (1986); State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973).” State v. Chung, 202 Conn. 39, 47 , 519 A.2d 1175 (1987).

1989State v. Smith, 200 Conn. 465, 475 , 512 A.2d 189 (1986); State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973).” State v. Chung, 202 Conn. 39, 47 , 519 A.2d 1175 (1987).

21987–1989
State v. Kurvin green
conn · 1982
2 sentences

1986State v. Kurvin, 186 Conn. 555, 558 , 442 A.2d 1327 (1982); State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973).

1986State v. Kurvin, 186 Conn. 555, 558 , 442 A.2d 1327 (1982); State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973).

21985–1986
Wainwright v. Sykes green
scotus · 1977
2 sentences

1981It appears that some new vitality may have been breathed into our contemporaneous objection rule by a more recent holding that failure to comply with such a rule, even where the issue is one of constitutional nature, such as the admissibility of an incriminating statement in claimed violation of Miranda , precludes federal habeas corpus intervention “absent a showing of cause for the non-compliance and some showing of actual prejudice resulting from the alleged constitutional violation.” Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72, 84 , 97 S. Ct. 2497 , 53 L.

1981It appears that some new vitality may have been breathed into our contemporaneous objection rule by a more recent holding that failure to comply with such a rule, even where the issue is one of constitutional nature, such as the admissibility of an incriminating statement in claimed violation of Miranda , precludes federal habeas corpus intervention “absent a showing of cause for the non-compliance and some showing of actual prejudice resulting from the alleged constitutional violation.” Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72, 84 , 97 S. Ct. 2497 , 53 L.

21981–1981
State v. Simms green
conn · 1976
2 sentences

1978If the plaintiff’s claim is to be considered, it must come within the second category of “exceptional circumstances.” State v. Simms, 170 Conn. 206, 208 , 365 A.2d 821 .

1978If the plaintiff’s claim is to be considered, it must come within the second category of “exceptional circumstances.” State v. Simms, 170 Conn. 206, 208 , 365 A.2d 821 .

21976–1978
State v. Rice green
conn · 1976
2 sentences

1977Even if the exception were not adequate, however, the circumstances of this case warrant a review of the claimed error, because “the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973); State v. Rice, 172 Conn. 94, 101 , 374 A.2d 128 (1976). *99 Troynack was found guilty of manslaughter in the second degree.

1977Even if the exception were not adequate, however, the circumstances of this case warrant a review of the claimed error, because “the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973); State v. Rice, 172 Conn. 94, 101 , 374 A.2d 128 (1976). *99 Troynack was found guilty of manslaughter in the second degree.

21977–1977
State v. Buteau green
conn · 1949
2 sentences

1976Exceptions are made in capital cases; State v. Davis, 158 Conn. 341 , 345 ; State v. Davies, 146 Conn. 137 , 145 ; State v. Walters, 145 Conn. 60 , 65 ; State v. Buteau, 136 Conn. 113 , 125 ; in cases where a new constitutional right not readily foreseeable has developed between the time of trial and that of appeal; State v. Vars, 154 Conn. 255 , 271-72 ; and in cases where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.

1976Exceptions are made in capital cases; State v. Davis, 158 Conn. 341, 345 ; State v. Davies, 146 Conn. 137, 145 ; State v. Walters, 145 Conn. 60, 65 ; State v. Buteau, 136 Conn. 113, 125 ; in cases where a new constitutional right not readily foreseeable has developed between the time of trial and that of appeal; State v. Vars, 154 Conn. 255, 271-72 ; and in eases where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.

21976–1976
State v. Walters green
conn · 1958
2 sentences

1976Exceptions are made in capital cases; State v. Davis, 158 Conn. 341 , 345 ; State v. Davies, 146 Conn. 137 , 145 ; State v. Walters, 145 Conn. 60 , 65 ; State v. Buteau, 136 Conn. 113 , 125 ; in cases where a new constitutional right not readily foreseeable has developed between the time of trial and that of appeal; State v. Vars, 154 Conn. 255 , 271-72 ; and in cases where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.

1976Exceptions are made in capital cases; State v. Davis, 158 Conn. 341, 345 ; State v. Davies, 146 Conn. 137, 145 ; State v. Walters, 145 Conn. 60, 65 ; State v. Buteau, 136 Conn. 113, 125 ; in cases where a new constitutional right not readily foreseeable has developed between the time of trial and that of appeal; State v. Vars, 154 Conn. 255, 271-72 ; and in eases where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.

21976–1976
State v. Davies green
conn · 1959
2 sentences

1976Exceptions are made in capital cases; State v. Davis, 158 Conn. 341 , 345 ; State v. Davies, 146 Conn. 137 , 145 ; State v. Walters, 145 Conn. 60 , 65 ; State v. Buteau, 136 Conn. 113 , 125 ; in cases where a new constitutional right not readily foreseeable has developed between the time of trial and that of appeal; State v. Vars, 154 Conn. 255 , 271-72 ; and in cases where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.

1976Exceptions are made in capital cases; State v. Davis, 158 Conn. 341, 345 ; State v. Davies, 146 Conn. 137, 145 ; State v. Walters, 145 Conn. 60, 65 ; State v. Buteau, 136 Conn. 113, 125 ; in cases where a new constitutional right not readily foreseeable has developed between the time of trial and that of appeal; State v. Vars, 154 Conn. 255, 271-72 ; and in eases where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.

21976–1976
State v. Davis green
conn · 1969
2 sentences

1976Exceptions are made in capital cases; State v. Davis, 158 Conn. 341 , 345 ; State v. Davies, 146 Conn. 137 , 145 ; State v. Walters, 145 Conn. 60 , 65 ; State v. Buteau, 136 Conn. 113 , 125 ; in cases where a new constitutional right not readily foreseeable has developed between the time of trial and that of appeal; State v. Vars, 154 Conn. 255 , 271-72 ; and in cases where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.

1976Exceptions are made in capital cases; State v. Davis, 158 Conn. 341, 345 ; State v. Davies, 146 Conn. 137, 145 ; State v. Walters, 145 Conn. 60, 65 ; State v. Buteau, 136 Conn. 113, 125 ; in cases where a new constitutional right not readily foreseeable has developed between the time of trial and that of appeal; State v. Vars, 154 Conn. 255, 271-72 ; and in eases where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.

21976–1976
Burnham v. Administrator green
conn · 1981
2 sentences

1991While the standard for review of administrative proceedings must allow for judicial scrutiny of some claims of constitutional error, see Burnham v. Administrator, 184 Conn. 317 , 322 , 439 A.2d 1008 (1981), this can only be in cases where the alleged constitutional violation is fundamental and the record adequately supports the claim.

1991While the standard for review of administrative proceedings must allow for judicial scrutiny of some claims of constitutional error, see Burnham v. Administrator, 184 Conn. 317 , 322 , 439 A.2d 1008 (1981), this can only be in cases where the alleged constitutional violation is fundamental and the record adequately supports the claim.

11991–1991
State v. Anderson green
conn · 1989
2 sentences

1990“A claim not raised at trial is reviewable only if the record adequately supports a claim that the defendant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” State v. Anderson, 212 Conn. 31, 36 , 561 A.2d 897 (1989); State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 239 , 567 A.2d 823 (1989).

1990“A claim not raised at trial is reviewable only if the record adequately supports a claim that the defendant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” State v. Anderson, 212 Conn. 31, 36 , 561 A.2d 897 (1989); State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 239 , 567 A.2d 823 (1989).

11990–1990
State v. Cazimovski green
connappct · 1989
2 sentences

1990Review may be appropriate . . . where the record adequately supports a claim that the defend ant has been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” (Citation omitted.) State v. Cazimovski, 20 Conn. App. 190, 191 , 565 A.2d 254 (1989); see also Practice Book § 4185. “[A] defendant can prevail on a claim of constitutional error not preserved at trial only if all of the following conditions are met: (1) the record is adequate to review the alleged claim of error; (2) the claim is of constitutional magnitude alleging the violation of a fundamental right; (3) the alleged con

1990Review may be appropriate . . . where the record adequately supports a claim that the defend ant has been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” (Citation omitted.) State v. Cazimovski, 20 Conn. App. 190, 191 , 565 A.2d 254 (1989); see also Practice Book § 4185. “[A] defendant can prevail on a claim of constitutional error not preserved at trial only if all of the following conditions are met: (1) the record is adequate to review the alleged claim of error; (2) the claim is of constitutional magnitude alleging the violation of a fundamental right; (3) the alleged con

11990–1990
State v. Collins green
conn · 1978
1 sentence

1990In State v. Collins, 176 Conn. 7 (1978) the Court at pages 9 and 10 stated in part as follows: In order for a plea of guilty to be constitutionally valid, it must be "equally voluntary and knowing . . . . it cannot be truly voluntary unless the defendant possesses an understanding of the law in relation to the facts." McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 466 , 89 S.Ct. 1166 , 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969); Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 242 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); State v. Marra, 174 Conn. 338 , 340 , 387 A.2d 550 (1978); Consiglio v. Warden, 160 Conn. 151 , CT Page 673 162, 2

11990–1990
McCarthy v. United States green
scotus · 1969
2 sentences

1990In State v. Collins, 176 Conn. 7 (1978) the Court at pages 9 and 10 stated in part as follows: In order for a plea of guilty to be constitutionally valid, it must be "equally voluntary and knowing . . . . it cannot be truly voluntary unless the defendant possesses an understanding of the law in relation to the facts." McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 466 , 89 S.Ct. 1166 , 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969); Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 242 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); State v. Marra, 174 Conn. 338 , 340 , 387 A.2d 550 (1978); Consiglio v. Warden, 160 Conn. 151 , CT Page 673 162, 2

1990In State v. Collins, 176 Conn. 7 (1978) the Court at pages 9 and 10 stated in part as follows: In order for a plea of guilty to be constitutionally valid, it must be "equally voluntary and knowing . . . . it cannot be truly voluntary unless the defendant possesses an understanding of the law in relation to the facts." McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 466 , 89 S.Ct. 1166 , 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969); Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 242 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); State v. Marra, 174 Conn. 338 , 340 , 387 A.2d 550 (1978); Consiglio v. Warden, 160 Conn. 151 , CT Page 673 162, 2

11990–1990
Boykin v. Alabama green
scotus · 1969
2 sentences

1990In State v. Collins, 176 Conn. 7 (1978) the Court at pages 9 and 10 stated in part as follows: In order for a plea of guilty to be constitutionally valid, it must be "equally voluntary and knowing . . . . it cannot be truly voluntary unless the defendant possesses an understanding of the law in relation to the facts." McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 466 , 89 S.Ct. 1166 , 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969); Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 242 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); State v. Marra, 174 Conn. 338 , 340 , 387 A.2d 550 (1978); Consiglio v. Warden, 160 Conn. 151 , CT Page 673 162, 2

1990In State v. Collins, 176 Conn. 7 (1978) the Court at pages 9 and 10 stated in part as follows: In order for a plea of guilty to be constitutionally valid, it must be "equally voluntary and knowing . . . . it cannot be truly voluntary unless the defendant possesses an understanding of the law in relation to the facts." McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 466 , 89 S.Ct. 1166 , 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969); Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 242 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); State v. Marra, 174 Conn. 338 , 340 , 387 A.2d 550 (1978); Consiglio v. Warden, 160 Conn. 151 , CT Page 673 162, 2

11990–1990
Consiglio v. Warden, Connecticut State Prison green
conn · 1970
2 sentences

1990In State v. Collins, 176 Conn. 7 (1978) the Court at pages 9 and 10 stated in part as follows: In order for a plea of guilty to be constitutionally valid, it must be "equally voluntary and knowing . . . . it cannot be truly voluntary unless the defendant possesses an understanding of the law in relation to the facts." McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 466 , 89 S.Ct. 1166 , 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969); Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 242 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); State v. Marra, 174 Conn. 338 , 340 , 387 A.2d 550 (1978); Consiglio v. Warden, 160 Conn. 151 , CT Page 673 162, 2

1990In State v. Collins, 176 Conn. 7 (1978) the Court at pages 9 and 10 stated in part as follows: In order for a plea of guilty to be constitutionally valid, it must be "equally voluntary and knowing . . . . it cannot be truly voluntary unless the defendant possesses an understanding of the law in relation to the facts." McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 466 , 89 S.Ct. 1166 , 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969); Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 242 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); State v. Marra, 174 Conn. 338 , 340 , 387 A.2d 550 (1978); Consiglio v. Warden, 160 Conn. 151 , CT Page 673 162, 2

11990–1990
State v. Marra green
conn · 1978
2 sentences

1990In State v. Collins, 176 Conn. 7 (1978) the Court at pages 9 and 10 stated in part as follows: In order for a plea of guilty to be constitutionally valid, it must be "equally voluntary and knowing . . . . it cannot be truly voluntary unless the defendant possesses an understanding of the law in relation to the facts." McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 466 , 89 S.Ct. 1166 , 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969); Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 242 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); State v. Marra, 174 Conn. 338 , 340 , 387 A.2d 550 (1978); Consiglio v. Warden, 160 Conn. 151 , CT Page 673 162, 2

1990In State v. Collins, 176 Conn. 7 (1978) the Court at pages 9 and 10 stated in part as follows: In order for a plea of guilty to be constitutionally valid, it must be "equally voluntary and knowing . . . . it cannot be truly voluntary unless the defendant possesses an understanding of the law in relation to the facts." McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 466 , 89 S.Ct. 1166 , 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969); Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 242 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); State v. Marra, 174 Conn. 338 , 340 , 387 A.2d 550 (1978); Consiglio v. Warden, 160 Conn. 151 , CT Page 673 162, 2

11990–1990
State v. Chong Chung green
conn · 1987
2 sentences

1989State v. Smith, 200 Conn. 465, 475 , 512 A.2d 189 (1986); State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973).” State v. Chung, 202 Conn. 39, 47 , 519 A.2d 1175 (1987).

1989State v. Smith, 200 Conn. 465, 475 , 512 A.2d 189 (1986); State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973).” State v. Chung, 202 Conn. 39, 47 , 519 A.2d 1175 (1987).

11989–1989
State v. Uretek, Inc. green
conn · 1988
2 sentences

1989On that basis he claims that the issue is reviewable under the exception established in State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973), “where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” In State v. Uretek, Inc., 207 Conn. 706, 713 , 543 A.2d 709 (1988), we summarily rejected a claim that the lack of extrinsic corroboration of an admission that was vital to proving an element of the offense implicated a fundamental constitutional right and, therefore, concluded that such a claim did not qualif

1989On that basis he claims that the issue is reviewable under the exception established in State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973), “where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” In State v. Uretek, Inc., 207 Conn. 706, 713 , 543 A.2d 709 (1988), we summarily rejected a claim that the lack of extrinsic corroboration of an admission that was vital to proving an element of the offense implicated a fundamental constitutional right and, therefore, concluded that such a claim did not qualif

11989–1989
State v. Smith green
conn · 1988
2 sentences

1989The second “exceptional circumstance” may arise where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.’ (Emphasis added.) Id., 70 .” State v. Smith, 209 Conn. 423, 425 , 551 A.2d 742 (1988).

1989The second “exceptional circumstance” may arise where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.’ (Emphasis added.) Id., 70 .” State v. Smith, 209 Conn. 423, 425 , 551 A.2d 742 (1988).

11989–1989
State v. Hull green
conn · 1989
2 sentences

1989“Belated appellate scrutiny is warranted only for egregious errors that undermine the fairness of a trial and cast doubt on the integrity of judicial proceedings.” State v. Hull, 210 Conn. 481, 485 , 556 A.2d 154 (1989).

1989“Belated appellate scrutiny is warranted only for egregious errors that undermine the fairness of a trial and cast doubt on the integrity of judicial proceedings.” State v. Hull, 210 Conn. 481, 485 , 556 A.2d 154 (1989).

11989–1989
State v. Bailey green
conn · 1988
2 sentences

1989Where a criminal defendant has failed in the trial court to preserve a claim of error for appellate review, review under State v. Evans, supra, is appropriate “ ‘where the record adequately supports a claim that the defendant has been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.’ ” State v. Bailey, 209 Conn. 322, 329 , 551 A.2d 1206 (1988).

1989Where a criminal defendant has failed in the trial court to preserve a claim of error for appellate review, review under State v. Evans, supra, is appropriate “ ‘where the record adequately supports a claim that the defendant has been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.’ ” State v. Bailey, 209 Conn. 322, 329 , 551 A.2d 1206 (1988).

11989–1989
State v. Robinson green
conn · 1987
11988–1988
State v. Williams green
conn · 1987
11988–1988
McLaughlin v. Bronson green
conn · 1988
11988–1988
State v. Gonzalez green
conn · 1987
11988–1988
Payne v. Robinson green
conn · 1988
11988–1988
Doyle v. Ohio green
scotus · 1976
11988–1988
State v. Miller green
conn · 1982
11988–1988
Plyler v. Evatt green
scotus · 1988
11988–1988
Ochoa-Ochoa v. United States green
scotus · 1988
11988–1988
State v. Tyler-Barcomb green
conn · 1985
11987–1987
State v. Loyd neutral
connappct · 1986
11987–1987
Cahill v. Board of Education green
conn · 1982
11987–1987
Ballard v. United States green
scotus · 1986
11987–1987
Matchett v. Chicago Council of Lawyers green
scotus · 1986
11987–1987
O'Mahony v. Chicago Transit Authority green
scotus · 1986
11987–1987
State v. Hinckley green
conn · 1985
11986–1986
State v. Liebowitz green
connappct · 1986
11986–1986

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-54a (15) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-134 (13) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-3 (9) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-59 (8) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-48 (7) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-70 (7) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-119 (6) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-123 (6) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-35a (6) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-49 (6) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-122 (5) CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 53a-54c (5)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

Where else courts name it

CT 86 (1974–2021) UT 2 (2022–2022)

Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check