86 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1974–2021 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Evansgreen2 sentences2021The second ‘exceptional circumstance’ may arise where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitu- tional right and a fair trial.’’ (Citation omitted.) State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973); see State v. Vars, 154 Conn. 255 , 269–72, 224 A.2d 744 (1966) (holding that new constitutional claims need not be preserved at trial to be raised on appeal but not addressing whether such claims must be raised in initial brief on appeal). 2021The second ‘exceptional circumstance’ may arise where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitu- tional right and a fair trial.’’ (Citation omitted.) State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973); see State v. Vars, 154 Conn. 255 , 269–72, 224 A.2d 744 (1966) (holding that new constitutional claims need not be preserved at trial to be raised on appeal but not addressing whether such claims must be raised in initial brief on appeal). | 2 | 67 |
State v. Preyergreen2 sentences1986This court reaches the merits of issues not raised below only where the trial court has committed plain error; Practice Book § 3063; where “a new constitutional right not readily foreseeable has arisen between the time of trial and appeal”; State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973); or where “the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” Id.; see State v. Preyer, 198 Conn. 190 , 502 A.2d 858 (1985). 1986This court reaches the merits of issues not raised below only where the trial court has committed plain error; Practice Book § 3063; where “a new constitutional right not readily foreseeable has arisen between the time of trial and appeal”; State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973); or where “the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” Id.; see State v. Preyer, 198 Conn. 190 , 502 A.2d 858 (1985). | 2 | 3 |
State v. Goldinggreen2 sentences2011See State v. Golding, supra, 213 Conn. at 238-39 , 567 A.2d 823 (explaining "exceptional" circumstance presented by unpreserved claim of constitutional violation if record sufficient for review); see also State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973) (predecessor to Golding identified "`exceptional circumstance'" that arises when "the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial"). 2011See State v. Golding, supra, 213 Conn. at 238-39 , 567 A.2d 823 (explaining "exceptional" circumstance presented by unpreserved claim of constitutional violation if record sufficient for review); see also State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973) (predecessor to Golding identified "`exceptional circumstance'" that arises when "the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial"). | 1 | 5 |
State v. Varsgreen2 sentences2021The second ‘exceptional circumstance’ may arise where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitu- tional right and a fair trial.’’ (Citation omitted.) State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973); see State v. Vars, 154 Conn. 255 , 269–72, 224 A.2d 744 (1966) (holding that new constitutional claims need not be preserved at trial to be raised on appeal but not addressing whether such claims must be raised in initial brief on appeal). 2021The second ‘exceptional circumstance’ may arise where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitu- tional right and a fair trial.’’ (Citation omitted.) State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973); see State v. Vars, 154 Conn. 255 , 269–72, 224 A.2d 744 (1966) (holding that new constitutional claims need not be preserved at trial to be raised on appeal but not addressing whether such claims must be raised in initial brief on appeal). | 1 | 4 |
State v. Plourdegreen2 sentences1989While we do not ordinarily review claims not raised below, we have recognized an exception “where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973); see State v. Plourde, 208 Conn. 455, 462 , 545 A.2d 1071 (1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1034 , 109 S. Ct. 847 , 102 L. 1989While we do not ordinarily review claims not raised below, we have recognized an exception “where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973); see State v. Plourde, 208 Conn. 455, 462 , 545 A.2d 1071 (1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1034 , 109 S. Ct. 847 , 102 L. | 1 | 1 |
Connecticut v. Plourdegreen1 sentence1989While we do not ordinarily review claims not raised below, we have recognized an exception “where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973); see State v. Plourde, 208 Conn. 455, 462 , 545 A.2d 1071 (1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1034 , 109 S. Ct. 847 , 102 L. | 1 | 1 |
California v. Radkegreen1 sentence1989While we do not ordinarily review claims not raised below, we have recognized an exception “where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973); see State v. Plourde, 208 Conn. 455, 462 , 545 A.2d 1071 (1988), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 1034 , 109 S. Ct. 847 , 102 L. | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Vinalgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Briggsgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Rodriguezgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Crawfordgreen | 1 | 1 |
| State v. Malleygreen | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Torrence
green
2 sentences1987Rather, “[o]nce it has been established that the record adequately supports a claim that a defendant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial . . . the merits of the claim must be determined.” (Emphasis added.) State v. Torrence, 196 Conn. 430, 435 , 493 A.2d 865 (1985). 1987Rather, “[o]nce it has been established that the record adequately supports a claim that a defendant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial . . . the merits of the claim must be determined.” (Emphasis added.) State v. Torrence, 196 Conn. 430, 435 , 493 A.2d 865 (1985). | 3 | 1985–1987 |
State v. Smith
green
2 sentences1989State v. Smith, 200 Conn. 465, 475 , 512 A.2d 189 (1986); State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973).” State v. Chung, 202 Conn. 39, 47 , 519 A.2d 1175 (1987). 1989State v. Smith, 200 Conn. 465, 475 , 512 A.2d 189 (1986); State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973).” State v. Chung, 202 Conn. 39, 47 , 519 A.2d 1175 (1987). | 2 | 1987–1989 |
State v. Kurvin
green
2 sentences1986State v. Kurvin, 186 Conn. 555, 558 , 442 A.2d 1327 (1982); State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973). 1986State v. Kurvin, 186 Conn. 555, 558 , 442 A.2d 1327 (1982); State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973). | 2 | 1985–1986 |
Wainwright v. Sykes
green
2 sentences1981It appears that some new vitality may have been breathed into our contemporaneous objection rule by a more recent holding that failure to comply with such a rule, even where the issue is one of constitutional nature, such as the admissibility of an incriminating statement in claimed violation of Miranda , precludes federal habeas corpus intervention “absent a showing of cause for the non-compliance and some showing of actual prejudice resulting from the alleged constitutional violation.” Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72, 84 , 97 S. Ct. 2497 , 53 L. 1981It appears that some new vitality may have been breathed into our contemporaneous objection rule by a more recent holding that failure to comply with such a rule, even where the issue is one of constitutional nature, such as the admissibility of an incriminating statement in claimed violation of Miranda , precludes federal habeas corpus intervention “absent a showing of cause for the non-compliance and some showing of actual prejudice resulting from the alleged constitutional violation.” Wainwright v. Sykes, 433 U.S. 72, 84 , 97 S. Ct. 2497 , 53 L. | 2 | 1981–1981 |
State v. Simms
green
2 sentences1978If the plaintiff’s claim is to be considered, it must come within the second category of “exceptional circumstances.” State v. Simms, 170 Conn. 206, 208 , 365 A.2d 821 . 1978If the plaintiff’s claim is to be considered, it must come within the second category of “exceptional circumstances.” State v. Simms, 170 Conn. 206, 208 , 365 A.2d 821 . | 2 | 1976–1978 |
State v. Rice
green
2 sentences1977Even if the exception were not adequate, however, the circumstances of this case warrant a review of the claimed error, because “the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973); State v. Rice, 172 Conn. 94, 101 , 374 A.2d 128 (1976). *99 Troynack was found guilty of manslaughter in the second degree. 1977Even if the exception were not adequate, however, the circumstances of this case warrant a review of the claimed error, because “the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973); State v. Rice, 172 Conn. 94, 101 , 374 A.2d 128 (1976). *99 Troynack was found guilty of manslaughter in the second degree. | 2 | 1977–1977 |
State v. Buteau
green
2 sentences1976Exceptions are made in capital cases; State v. Davis, 158 Conn. 341 , 345 ; State v. Davies, 146 Conn. 137 , 145 ; State v. Walters, 145 Conn. 60 , 65 ; State v. Buteau, 136 Conn. 113 , 125 ; in cases where a new constitutional right not readily foreseeable has developed between the time of trial and that of appeal; State v. Vars, 154 Conn. 255 , 271-72 ; and in cases where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial. 1976Exceptions are made in capital cases; State v. Davis, 158 Conn. 341, 345 ; State v. Davies, 146 Conn. 137, 145 ; State v. Walters, 145 Conn. 60, 65 ; State v. Buteau, 136 Conn. 113, 125 ; in cases where a new constitutional right not readily foreseeable has developed between the time of trial and that of appeal; State v. Vars, 154 Conn. 255, 271-72 ; and in eases where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial. | 2 | 1976–1976 |
State v. Walters
green
2 sentences1976Exceptions are made in capital cases; State v. Davis, 158 Conn. 341 , 345 ; State v. Davies, 146 Conn. 137 , 145 ; State v. Walters, 145 Conn. 60 , 65 ; State v. Buteau, 136 Conn. 113 , 125 ; in cases where a new constitutional right not readily foreseeable has developed between the time of trial and that of appeal; State v. Vars, 154 Conn. 255 , 271-72 ; and in cases where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial. 1976Exceptions are made in capital cases; State v. Davis, 158 Conn. 341, 345 ; State v. Davies, 146 Conn. 137, 145 ; State v. Walters, 145 Conn. 60, 65 ; State v. Buteau, 136 Conn. 113, 125 ; in cases where a new constitutional right not readily foreseeable has developed between the time of trial and that of appeal; State v. Vars, 154 Conn. 255, 271-72 ; and in eases where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial. | 2 | 1976–1976 |
State v. Davies
green
2 sentences1976Exceptions are made in capital cases; State v. Davis, 158 Conn. 341 , 345 ; State v. Davies, 146 Conn. 137 , 145 ; State v. Walters, 145 Conn. 60 , 65 ; State v. Buteau, 136 Conn. 113 , 125 ; in cases where a new constitutional right not readily foreseeable has developed between the time of trial and that of appeal; State v. Vars, 154 Conn. 255 , 271-72 ; and in cases where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial. 1976Exceptions are made in capital cases; State v. Davis, 158 Conn. 341, 345 ; State v. Davies, 146 Conn. 137, 145 ; State v. Walters, 145 Conn. 60, 65 ; State v. Buteau, 136 Conn. 113, 125 ; in cases where a new constitutional right not readily foreseeable has developed between the time of trial and that of appeal; State v. Vars, 154 Conn. 255, 271-72 ; and in eases where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial. | 2 | 1976–1976 |
State v. Davis
green
2 sentences1976Exceptions are made in capital cases; State v. Davis, 158 Conn. 341 , 345 ; State v. Davies, 146 Conn. 137 , 145 ; State v. Walters, 145 Conn. 60 , 65 ; State v. Buteau, 136 Conn. 113 , 125 ; in cases where a new constitutional right not readily foreseeable has developed between the time of trial and that of appeal; State v. Vars, 154 Conn. 255 , 271-72 ; and in cases where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial. 1976Exceptions are made in capital cases; State v. Davis, 158 Conn. 341, 345 ; State v. Davies, 146 Conn. 137, 145 ; State v. Walters, 145 Conn. 60, 65 ; State v. Buteau, 136 Conn. 113, 125 ; in cases where a new constitutional right not readily foreseeable has developed between the time of trial and that of appeal; State v. Vars, 154 Conn. 255, 271-72 ; and in eases where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial. | 2 | 1976–1976 |
Burnham v. Administrator
green
2 sentences1991While the standard for review of administrative proceedings must allow for judicial scrutiny of some claims of constitutional error, see Burnham v. Administrator, 184 Conn. 317 , 322 , 439 A.2d 1008 (1981), this can only be in cases where the alleged constitutional violation is fundamental and the record adequately supports the claim. 1991While the standard for review of administrative proceedings must allow for judicial scrutiny of some claims of constitutional error, see Burnham v. Administrator, 184 Conn. 317 , 322 , 439 A.2d 1008 (1981), this can only be in cases where the alleged constitutional violation is fundamental and the record adequately supports the claim. | 1 | 1991–1991 |
State v. Anderson
green
2 sentences1990“A claim not raised at trial is reviewable only if the record adequately supports a claim that the defendant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” State v. Anderson, 212 Conn. 31, 36 , 561 A.2d 897 (1989); State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 239 , 567 A.2d 823 (1989). 1990“A claim not raised at trial is reviewable only if the record adequately supports a claim that the defendant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” State v. Anderson, 212 Conn. 31, 36 , 561 A.2d 897 (1989); State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 239 , 567 A.2d 823 (1989). | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Cazimovski
green
2 sentences1990Review may be appropriate . . . where the record adequately supports a claim that the defend ant has been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” (Citation omitted.) State v. Cazimovski, 20 Conn. App. 190, 191 , 565 A.2d 254 (1989); see also Practice Book § 4185. “[A] defendant can prevail on a claim of constitutional error not preserved at trial only if all of the following conditions are met: (1) the record is adequate to review the alleged claim of error; (2) the claim is of constitutional magnitude alleging the violation of a fundamental right; (3) the alleged con 1990Review may be appropriate . . . where the record adequately supports a claim that the defend ant has been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” (Citation omitted.) State v. Cazimovski, 20 Conn. App. 190, 191 , 565 A.2d 254 (1989); see also Practice Book § 4185. “[A] defendant can prevail on a claim of constitutional error not preserved at trial only if all of the following conditions are met: (1) the record is adequate to review the alleged claim of error; (2) the claim is of constitutional magnitude alleging the violation of a fundamental right; (3) the alleged con | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Collins
green
1 sentence1990In State v. Collins, 176 Conn. 7 (1978) the Court at pages 9 and 10 stated in part as follows: In order for a plea of guilty to be constitutionally valid, it must be "equally voluntary and knowing . . . . it cannot be truly voluntary unless the defendant possesses an understanding of the law in relation to the facts." McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 466 , 89 S.Ct. 1166 , 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969); Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 242 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); State v. Marra, 174 Conn. 338 , 340 , 387 A.2d 550 (1978); Consiglio v. Warden, 160 Conn. 151 , CT Page 673 162, 2 | 1 | 1990–1990 |
McCarthy v. United States
green
2 sentences1990In State v. Collins, 176 Conn. 7 (1978) the Court at pages 9 and 10 stated in part as follows: In order for a plea of guilty to be constitutionally valid, it must be "equally voluntary and knowing . . . . it cannot be truly voluntary unless the defendant possesses an understanding of the law in relation to the facts." McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 466 , 89 S.Ct. 1166 , 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969); Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 242 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); State v. Marra, 174 Conn. 338 , 340 , 387 A.2d 550 (1978); Consiglio v. Warden, 160 Conn. 151 , CT Page 673 162, 2 1990In State v. Collins, 176 Conn. 7 (1978) the Court at pages 9 and 10 stated in part as follows: In order for a plea of guilty to be constitutionally valid, it must be "equally voluntary and knowing . . . . it cannot be truly voluntary unless the defendant possesses an understanding of the law in relation to the facts." McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 466 , 89 S.Ct. 1166 , 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969); Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 242 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); State v. Marra, 174 Conn. 338 , 340 , 387 A.2d 550 (1978); Consiglio v. Warden, 160 Conn. 151 , CT Page 673 162, 2 | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Boykin v. Alabama
green
2 sentences1990In State v. Collins, 176 Conn. 7 (1978) the Court at pages 9 and 10 stated in part as follows: In order for a plea of guilty to be constitutionally valid, it must be "equally voluntary and knowing . . . . it cannot be truly voluntary unless the defendant possesses an understanding of the law in relation to the facts." McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 466 , 89 S.Ct. 1166 , 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969); Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 242 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); State v. Marra, 174 Conn. 338 , 340 , 387 A.2d 550 (1978); Consiglio v. Warden, 160 Conn. 151 , CT Page 673 162, 2 1990In State v. Collins, 176 Conn. 7 (1978) the Court at pages 9 and 10 stated in part as follows: In order for a plea of guilty to be constitutionally valid, it must be "equally voluntary and knowing . . . . it cannot be truly voluntary unless the defendant possesses an understanding of the law in relation to the facts." McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 466 , 89 S.Ct. 1166 , 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969); Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 242 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); State v. Marra, 174 Conn. 338 , 340 , 387 A.2d 550 (1978); Consiglio v. Warden, 160 Conn. 151 , CT Page 673 162, 2 | 1 | 1990–1990 |
Consiglio v. Warden, Connecticut State Prison
green
2 sentences1990In State v. Collins, 176 Conn. 7 (1978) the Court at pages 9 and 10 stated in part as follows: In order for a plea of guilty to be constitutionally valid, it must be "equally voluntary and knowing . . . . it cannot be truly voluntary unless the defendant possesses an understanding of the law in relation to the facts." McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 466 , 89 S.Ct. 1166 , 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969); Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 242 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); State v. Marra, 174 Conn. 338 , 340 , 387 A.2d 550 (1978); Consiglio v. Warden, 160 Conn. 151 , CT Page 673 162, 2 1990In State v. Collins, 176 Conn. 7 (1978) the Court at pages 9 and 10 stated in part as follows: In order for a plea of guilty to be constitutionally valid, it must be "equally voluntary and knowing . . . . it cannot be truly voluntary unless the defendant possesses an understanding of the law in relation to the facts." McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 466 , 89 S.Ct. 1166 , 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969); Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 242 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); State v. Marra, 174 Conn. 338 , 340 , 387 A.2d 550 (1978); Consiglio v. Warden, 160 Conn. 151 , CT Page 673 162, 2 | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Marra
green
2 sentences1990In State v. Collins, 176 Conn. 7 (1978) the Court at pages 9 and 10 stated in part as follows: In order for a plea of guilty to be constitutionally valid, it must be "equally voluntary and knowing . . . . it cannot be truly voluntary unless the defendant possesses an understanding of the law in relation to the facts." McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 466 , 89 S.Ct. 1166 , 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969); Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 242 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); State v. Marra, 174 Conn. 338 , 340 , 387 A.2d 550 (1978); Consiglio v. Warden, 160 Conn. 151 , CT Page 673 162, 2 1990In State v. Collins, 176 Conn. 7 (1978) the Court at pages 9 and 10 stated in part as follows: In order for a plea of guilty to be constitutionally valid, it must be "equally voluntary and knowing . . . . it cannot be truly voluntary unless the defendant possesses an understanding of the law in relation to the facts." McCarthy v. United States, 394 U.S. 459 , 466 , 89 S.Ct. 1166 , 22 L.Ed.2d 418 (1969); Boykin v. Alabama, 395 U.S. 238 , 242 , 89 S.Ct. 1709 , 23 L.Ed.2d 274 (1969); State v. Marra, 174 Conn. 338 , 340 , 387 A.2d 550 (1978); Consiglio v. Warden, 160 Conn. 151 , CT Page 673 162, 2 | 1 | 1990–1990 |
State v. Chong Chung
green
2 sentences1989State v. Smith, 200 Conn. 465, 475 , 512 A.2d 189 (1986); State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973).” State v. Chung, 202 Conn. 39, 47 , 519 A.2d 1175 (1987). 1989State v. Smith, 200 Conn. 465, 475 , 512 A.2d 189 (1986); State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973).” State v. Chung, 202 Conn. 39, 47 , 519 A.2d 1175 (1987). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
State v. Uretek, Inc.
green
2 sentences1989On that basis he claims that the issue is reviewable under the exception established in State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973), “where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” In State v. Uretek, Inc., 207 Conn. 706, 713 , 543 A.2d 709 (1988), we summarily rejected a claim that the lack of extrinsic corroboration of an admission that was vital to proving an element of the offense implicated a fundamental constitutional right and, therefore, concluded that such a claim did not qualif 1989On that basis he claims that the issue is reviewable under the exception established in State v. Evans, 165 Conn. 61, 70 , 327 A.2d 576 (1973), “where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.” In State v. Uretek, Inc., 207 Conn. 706, 713 , 543 A.2d 709 (1988), we summarily rejected a claim that the lack of extrinsic corroboration of an admission that was vital to proving an element of the offense implicated a fundamental constitutional right and, therefore, concluded that such a claim did not qualif | 1 | 1989–1989 |
State v. Smith
green
2 sentences1989The second “exceptional circumstance” may arise where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.’ (Emphasis added.) Id., 70 .” State v. Smith, 209 Conn. 423, 425 , 551 A.2d 742 (1988). 1989The second “exceptional circumstance” may arise where the record adequately supports a claim that a litigant has clearly been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.’ (Emphasis added.) Id., 70 .” State v. Smith, 209 Conn. 423, 425 , 551 A.2d 742 (1988). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
State v. Hull
green
2 sentences1989“Belated appellate scrutiny is warranted only for egregious errors that undermine the fairness of a trial and cast doubt on the integrity of judicial proceedings.” State v. Hull, 210 Conn. 481, 485 , 556 A.2d 154 (1989). 1989“Belated appellate scrutiny is warranted only for egregious errors that undermine the fairness of a trial and cast doubt on the integrity of judicial proceedings.” State v. Hull, 210 Conn. 481, 485 , 556 A.2d 154 (1989). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
State v. Bailey
green
2 sentences1989Where a criminal defendant has failed in the trial court to preserve a claim of error for appellate review, review under State v. Evans, supra, is appropriate “ ‘where the record adequately supports a claim that the defendant has been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.’ ” State v. Bailey, 209 Conn. 322, 329 , 551 A.2d 1206 (1988). 1989Where a criminal defendant has failed in the trial court to preserve a claim of error for appellate review, review under State v. Evans, supra, is appropriate “ ‘where the record adequately supports a claim that the defendant has been deprived of a fundamental constitutional right and a fair trial.’ ” State v. Bailey, 209 Conn. 322, 329 , 551 A.2d 1206 (1988). | 1 | 1989–1989 |
| State v. Robinson green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| State v. Williams green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| McLaughlin v. Bronson green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| State v. Gonzalez green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| Payne v. Robinson green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| Doyle v. Ohio green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| State v. Miller green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| Plyler v. Evatt green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| Ochoa-Ochoa v. United States green | 1 | 1988–1988 |
| State v. Tyler-Barcomb green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| State v. Loyd neutral | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| Cahill v. Board of Education green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| Ballard v. United States green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| Matchett v. Chicago Council of Lawyers green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| O'Mahony v. Chicago Transit Authority green | 1 | 1987–1987 |
| State v. Hinckley green | 1 | 1986–1986 |
| State v. Liebowitz green | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.