12 North Carolina opinions name it 2 courts 1984–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by North Carolina courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Thorpe v. Perry-Riddickgreen2 sentences2007Moreover, when examining a trial court’s decision to award attorney fees, this Court require [s] more than “[m]ere recitation by the trial court that it has considered all Washington factors.” Thorpe v. Perry-Riddick, *160 144 N.C. 2004Thus, when we examine a trial court’s decision concerning whether to award attorney’s fees, we require more than “[m]ere recitation by the trial court that it has considered all Washington factors.” Thorpe v. Perry-Riddick, 144 N.C. | 2 | 5 |
Tew v. Westgreen2 sentences2014Rather, the trial court must merely make findings as to "those facts matching those Washington factors apposite to the instant case." Id., 132 N.C. 2004While a “[m]ere recitation by the trial court that it has considered all [the] Washington factors” without making additional findings of fact is inadequate, id. at 572, 551 S.E.2d at 857 , “the trial court is not required to make detailed findings for each factor.” Id. (citing Tew v. West, 143 N.C. | 1 | 3 |
Messina v. Bellgreen2 sentences2014App. 111, 115 , 581 S.E.2d 80, 84 (2003) (“From the findings, it is clear that the trial court exercised its discretion by considering the whole record and in applying the Washington factors. 2014App. 111, 115 , 581 S.E.2d 80, 84 (2003) (“From the findings, it is clear that the trial court exercised its discretion by considering the whole record and in applying the Washington factors. | 1 | 1 |
In Re the Appeal From the Civil Penaltygreen2 sentences2006The trial court set forth extensive findings addressing the Washington factors and in consideration thereof reasoned that "Plaintiff should recover attorney's fees in the amount of $500.00." Reviewing the trial court's plenary findings and following the mandate of Whiteside, see In the Matter of Appeal from Civil Penalty, 324 N.C. 373, 384 , 379 S.E.2d 30, 37 (1989) ("a panel of the Court of Appeals is bound by a prior decision of another panel of the same court addressing the same question, but in a different case, unless overturned by an intervening decision from a higher court"), I cannot s 2006The trial court set forth extensive findings addressing the Washington factors and in consideration thereof reasoned that "Plaintiff should recover attorney's fees in the amount of $500.00." Reviewing the trial court's plenary findings and following the mandate of Whiteside, see In the Matter of Appeal from Civil Penalty, 324 N.C. 373, 384 , 379 S.E.2d 30, 37 (1989) ("a panel of the Court of Appeals is bound by a prior decision of another panel of the same court addressing the same question, but in a different case, unless overturned by an intervening decision from a higher court"), I cannot s | 1 | 1 |
Robinson v. Shuegreen2 sentences2003See id. 2003See id. | 1 | 1 |
Hicks v. Albertsongreen2 sentences2000See Hicks v. Albertson, 18 N.C. 2000See Hicks v. Albertson, 18 N.C. | 1 | 1 |
In Re the Marriage of Browngreen2 sentences1986Accord In re Marriage of Brown, 100 Wash.2d 729 , 675 P.2d 1207 (1984) ( en banc, overturning ninety-two-year-old Washington rule that personal injury recoveries are community property). 1986Accord In re Marriage of Brown, 100 Wash.2d 729 , 675 P.2d 1207 (1984) ( en banc, overturning ninety-two-year-old Washington rule that personal injury recoveries are community property). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in North Carolina. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Corum v. University of North Carolina
green
1 sentence2024Corum made the point most clearly, mooring this Court’s power to craft remedies to “the nature of constitutional government.” Corum, 330 N.C. at 788 . | 1 | 2024–2024 |
Washington v. Horton
green
2 sentences2014In its order awarding attorneys’ fees to plaintiff, the trial court made findings of fact that: defendant’s insurance carrier denied liability for the accident prior to litigation; defendant did not make an offer of judgment to plaintiff; at mediation, plaintiff refused to settle for less than $35,000.00 and defendant’s insurance carrier offered $5,500.00 to settle the case before an impasse was declared; a jury awarded plaintiff $6,600.00; defendant’s insurance carrier did not -6- exercise superior bargaining power; and “[t]he Court recalls the trial of this case and the issues involved, and 2014Rather, the trial court must merely make findings as to "those facts matching those Washington factors apposite to the instant case." Id., 132 N.C. | 1 | 2014–2014 |
McNeal v. Allen
green
2 sentences1984In McNeal v. Allen, 95 Wash.2d 265 , 621 P.2d 1285 (1980), the Supreme Court of Washington rejected the notion that a doctor could sue in defamation for a violation of Washington's rule against stating the amount of damages sought in a malpractice action. 1984In McNeal v. Allen, 95 Wash.2d 265 , 621 P.2d 1285 (1980), the Supreme Court of Washington rejected the notion that a doctor could sue in defamation for a violation of Washington's rule against stating the amount of damages sought in a malpractice action. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.