12 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2001–2015 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Seamster v. Stategreen2 sentences2015See Seamster v. State, 344 S.W.3d 592, 594 (Tex.App.-- Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, pet. ref’d); My Thi Tieu v. State, 299 S.W.3d 216, 225 (Tex.App.-- Houston [14th Dist.] 2009, pet. ref’d)(it is unnecessary to determine whether trial counsel’s representation was deficient if appellant cannot satisfy the second Strickland prong), citing Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697 , 104 S.Ct. at 2069-70 . 2015See Seamster v. State, 344 S.W.3d 592, 594 (Tex.App.-- Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, pet. ref’d); My Thi Tieu v. State, 299 S.W.3d 216, 225 (Tex.App.-- Houston [14th Dist.] 2009, pet. ref’d)(it is unnecessary to determine whether trial counsel’s representation was deficient if appellant cannot satisfy the second Strickland prong), citing Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697 , 104 S.Ct. at 2069-70 . | 4 | 4 |
My Thi Tieu v. Stategreen2 sentences2015See Seamster v. State, 344 S.W.3d 592, 594 (Tex.App.-- Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, pet. ref’d); My Thi Tieu v. State, 299 S.W.3d 216, 225 (Tex.App.-- Houston [14th Dist.] 2009, pet. ref’d)(it is unnecessary to determine whether trial counsel’s representation was deficient if appellant cannot satisfy the second Strickland prong), citing Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697 , 104 S.Ct. at 2069-70 . 2015See Seamster v. State, 344 S.W.3d 592, 594 (Tex.App.-- Houston [14th Dist.] 2011, pet. ref’d); My Thi Tieu v. State, 299 S.W.3d 216, 225 (Tex.App.-- Houston [14th Dist.] 2009, pet. ref’d)(it is unnecessary to determine whether trial counsel’s representation was deficient if appellant cannot satisfy the second Strickland prong), citing Strickland, 466 U.S. at 697 , 104 S.Ct. at 2069-70 . | 4 | 4 |
Alabama v. Sheltongreen2 sentences2008P. 44.2(a). [29] 41 S.W.3d 228, 235-36 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). [30] Id. at 234 . [31] Id. at 235 . [32] Id. [33] Id. [34] Id. at 236 . [35] Id. [36] Id. [37] Williams, 194 S.W.3d at 578-79 . [38] See Cordova v. Baca, 346 F.3d 924, 926-27 (9th Cir.2003) (discussing the difference between a defective Faretta colloquy and an ineffective waiver of the right to trial counsel and noting the potential application of a harmless error analysis to a defective Faretta colloquy to find an effective waiver); see also United States v. Virgil, 444 F.3d 447, 456-47 (5th Cir.2006) (recognizing 2008P. 44.2(a). [29] 41 S.W.3d 228, 235-36 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). [30] Id. at 234 . [31] Id. at 235 . [32] Id. [33] Id. [34] Id. at 236 . [35] Id. [36] Id. [37] Williams, 194 S.W.3d at 578-79 . [38] See Cordova v. Baca, 346 F.3d 924, 926-27 (9th Cir.2003) (discussing the difference between a defective Faretta colloquy and an ineffective waiver of the right to trial counsel and noting the potential application of a harmless error analysis to a defective Faretta colloquy to find an effective waiver); see also United States v. Virgil, 444 F.3d 447, 456-47 (5th Cir.2006) (recognizing | 3 | 3 |
Cordova v. Bacagreen2 sentences2008P. 44.2(a). [29] 41 S.W.3d 228, 235-36 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). [30] Id. at 234 . [31] Id. at 235 . [32] Id. [33] Id. [34] Id. at 236 . [35] Id. [36] Id. [37] Williams, 194 S.W.3d at 578-79 . [38] See Cordova v. Baca, 346 F.3d 924, 926-27 (9th Cir.2003) (discussing the difference between a defective Faretta colloquy and an ineffective waiver of the right to trial counsel and noting the potential application of a harmless error analysis to a defective Faretta colloquy to find an effective waiver); see also United States v. Virgil, 444 F.3d 447, 456-47 (5th Cir.2006) (recognizing 2008See Cordova v. Baca, 346 F.3d 924, 926-27 (9th Cir.2003) (discussing the difference between a defective Faretta colloquy and an ineffective waiver of the right to trial counsel and noting the potential application of a harmless error analysis to a defective Faretta colloquy to find an effective waiver); see also United States v. Virgil, 444 F.3d 447, 456-47 (5th Cir.2006) (recognizing that a defective waiver colloquy, as opposed to a defective waiver, may be subject to a harmless error analysis). 39 .See Alabama v. Shelton, 535 U.S. 654, 658 , 122 S.Ct. 1764 , 152 L.Ed.2d 888 (2002). 40 . | 3 | 3 |
United States v. Virgilgreen2 sentences2008P. 44.2(a). [29] 41 S.W.3d 228, 235-36 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). [30] Id. at 234 . [31] Id. at 235 . [32] Id. [33] Id. [34] Id. at 236 . [35] Id. [36] Id. [37] Williams, 194 S.W.3d at 578-79 . [38] See Cordova v. Baca, 346 F.3d 924, 926-27 (9th Cir.2003) (discussing the difference between a defective Faretta colloquy and an ineffective waiver of the right to trial counsel and noting the potential application of a harmless error analysis to a defective Faretta colloquy to find an effective waiver); see also United States v. Virgil, 444 F.3d 447, 456-47 (5th Cir.2006) (recognizing 2008See Cordova v. Baca, 346 F.3d 924, 926-27 (9th Cir.2003) (discussing the difference between a defective Faretta colloquy and an ineffective waiver of the right to trial counsel and noting the potential application of a harmless error analysis to a defective Faretta colloquy to find an effective waiver); see also United States v. Virgil, 444 F.3d 447, 456-47 (5th Cir.2006) (recognizing that a defective waiver colloquy, as opposed to a defective waiver, may be subject to a harmless error analysis). 39 .See Alabama v. Shelton, 535 U.S. 654, 658 , 122 S.Ct. 1764 , 152 L.Ed.2d 888 (2002). 40 . | 3 | 3 |
Johnson v. Zerbstgreen2 sentences2008P. 44.2(a). [29] 41 S.W.3d 228, 235-36 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). [30] Id. at 234 . [31] Id. at 235 . [32] Id. [33] Id. [34] Id. at 236 . [35] Id. [36] Id. [37] Williams, 194 S.W.3d at 578-79 . [38] See Cordova v. Baca, 346 F.3d 924, 926-27 (9th Cir.2003) (discussing the difference between a defective Faretta colloquy and an ineffective waiver of the right to trial counsel and noting the potential application of a harmless error analysis to a defective Faretta colloquy to find an effective waiver); see also United States v. Virgil, 444 F.3d 447, 456-47 (5th Cir.2006) (recognizing 2008P. 44.2(a). [29] 41 S.W.3d 228, 235-36 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). [30] Id. at 234 . [31] Id. at 235 . [32] Id. [33] Id. [34] Id. at 236 . [35] Id. [36] Id. [37] Williams, 194 S.W.3d at 578-79 . [38] See Cordova v. Baca, 346 F.3d 924, 926-27 (9th Cir.2003) (discussing the difference between a defective Faretta colloquy and an ineffective waiver of the right to trial counsel and noting the potential application of a harmless error analysis to a defective Faretta colloquy to find an effective waiver); see also United States v. Virgil, 444 F.3d 447, 456-47 (5th Cir.2006) (recognizing | 2 | 3 |
Gideon v. Wainwrightgreen2 sentences2008P. 44.2(a). [29] 41 S.W.3d 228, 235-36 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). [30] Id. at 234 . [31] Id. at 235 . [32] Id. [33] Id. [34] Id. at 236 . [35] Id. [36] Id. [37] Williams, 194 S.W.3d at 578-79 . [38] See Cordova v. Baca, 346 F.3d 924, 926-27 (9th Cir.2003) (discussing the difference between a defective Faretta colloquy and an ineffective waiver of the right to trial counsel and noting the potential application of a harmless error analysis to a defective Faretta colloquy to find an effective waiver); see also United States v. Virgil, 444 F.3d 447, 456-47 (5th Cir.2006) (recognizing 2008P. 44.2(a). [29] 41 S.W.3d 228, 235-36 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). [30] Id. at 234 . [31] Id. at 235 . [32] Id. [33] Id. [34] Id. at 236 . [35] Id. [36] Id. [37] Williams, 194 S.W.3d at 578-79 . [38] See Cordova v. Baca, 346 F.3d 924, 926-27 (9th Cir.2003) (discussing the difference between a defective Faretta colloquy and an ineffective waiver of the right to trial counsel and noting the potential application of a harmless error analysis to a defective Faretta colloquy to find an effective waiver); see also United States v. Virgil, 444 F.3d 447, 456-47 (5th Cir.2006) (recognizing | 2 | 2 |
Oliver v. Stategreen2 sentences2008P. 44.2(a). [29] 41 S.W.3d 228, 235-36 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). [30] Id. at 234 . [31] Id. at 235 . [32] Id. [33] Id. [34] Id. at 236 . [35] Id. [36] Id. [37] Williams, 194 S.W.3d at 578-79 . [38] See Cordova v. Baca, 346 F.3d 924, 926-27 (9th Cir.2003) (discussing the difference between a defective Faretta colloquy and an ineffective waiver of the right to trial counsel and noting the potential application of a harmless error analysis to a defective Faretta colloquy to find an effective waiver); see also United States v. Virgil, 444 F.3d 447, 456-47 (5th Cir.2006) (recognizing 2008Gideon, 372 U.S. at 340, 83 S.Ct. 792 (citing Zerbst, 304 U.S. at 465 , 58 S.Ct. 1019 ); Oliver v. State, 872 S.W.2d 713, 715-16 (Tex.Crim.App.1994). 41 . | 2 | 2 |
Miranda v. Arizonagreen2 sentences2008P. 44.2(a). [29] 41 S.W.3d 228, 235-36 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). [30] Id. at 234 . [31] Id. at 235 . [32] Id. [33] Id. [34] Id. at 236 . [35] Id. [36] Id. [37] Williams, 194 S.W.3d at 578-79 . [38] See Cordova v. Baca, 346 F.3d 924, 926-27 (9th Cir.2003) (discussing the difference between a defective Faretta colloquy and an ineffective waiver of the right to trial counsel and noting the potential application of a harmless error analysis to a defective Faretta colloquy to find an effective waiver); see also United States v. Virgil, 444 F.3d 447, 456-47 (5th Cir.2006) (recognizing 2008P. 44.2(a). [29] 41 S.W.3d 228, 235-36 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). [30] Id. at 234 . [31] Id. at 235 . [32] Id. [33] Id. [34] Id. at 236 . [35] Id. [36] Id. [37] Williams, 194 S.W.3d at 578-79 . [38] See Cordova v. Baca, 346 F.3d 924, 926-27 (9th Cir.2003) (discussing the difference between a defective Faretta colloquy and an ineffective waiver of the right to trial counsel and noting the potential application of a harmless error analysis to a defective Faretta colloquy to find an effective waiver); see also United States v. Virgil, 444 F.3d 447, 456-47 (5th Cir.2006) (recognizing | 1 | 2 |
Ayiba Queendalyn Chinyere & Suleman Nelson Ilodigwe and All Other Occupants of 13523 Bonilla Lane, Houston Texas 77083 v. Wells Fargo Bankgreen1 sentence2015See 440 S.W.3d 80, 85 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2012, no pet.). | 1 | 1 |
Fulbright v. Stategreen2 sentences2008P. 44.2(a). [29] 41 S.W.3d 228, 235-36 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). [30] Id. at 234 . [31] Id. at 235 . [32] Id. [33] Id. [34] Id. at 236 . [35] Id. [36] Id. [37] Williams, 194 S.W.3d at 578-79 . [38] See Cordova v. Baca, 346 F.3d 924, 926-27 (9th Cir.2003) (discussing the difference between a defective Faretta colloquy and an ineffective waiver of the right to trial counsel and noting the potential application of a harmless error analysis to a defective Faretta colloquy to find an effective waiver); see also United States v. Virgil, 444 F.3d 447, 456-47 (5th Cir.2006) (recognizing 2008P. 44.2(a). [29] 41 S.W.3d 228, 235-36 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). [30] Id. at 234 . [31] Id. at 235 . [32] Id. [33] Id. [34] Id. at 236 . [35] Id. [36] Id. [37] Williams, 194 S.W.3d at 578-79 . [38] See Cordova v. Baca, 346 F.3d 924, 926-27 (9th Cir.2003) (discussing the difference between a defective Faretta colloquy and an ineffective waiver of the right to trial counsel and noting the potential application of a harmless error analysis to a defective Faretta colloquy to find an effective waiver); see also United States v. Virgil, 444 F.3d 447, 456-47 (5th Cir.2006) (recognizing | 1 | 1 |
Penson v. Ohiogreen2 sentences2008P. 44.2(a). [29] 41 S.W.3d 228, 235-36 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). [30] Id. at 234 . [31] Id. at 235 . [32] Id. [33] Id. [34] Id. at 236 . [35] Id. [36] Id. [37] Williams, 194 S.W.3d at 578-79 . [38] See Cordova v. Baca, 346 F.3d 924, 926-27 (9th Cir.2003) (discussing the difference between a defective Faretta colloquy and an ineffective waiver of the right to trial counsel and noting the potential application of a harmless error analysis to a defective Faretta colloquy to find an effective waiver); see also United States v. Virgil, 444 F.3d 447, 456-47 (5th Cir.2006) (recognizing 2008P. 44.2(a). [29] 41 S.W.3d 228, 235-36 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). [30] Id. at 234 . [31] Id. at 235 . [32] Id. [33] Id. [34] Id. at 236 . [35] Id. [36] Id. [37] Williams, 194 S.W.3d at 578-79 . [38] See Cordova v. Baca, 346 F.3d 924, 926-27 (9th Cir.2003) (discussing the difference between a defective Faretta colloquy and an ineffective waiver of the right to trial counsel and noting the potential application of a harmless error analysis to a defective Faretta colloquy to find an effective waiver); see also United States v. Virgil, 444 F.3d 447, 456-47 (5th Cir.2006) (recognizing | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences2001“Failure to make the required showing of either deficient performance or sufficient prejudice defeats the ineffective claim.” Id. at 700 . 2001"Failure to make the required showing of either deficient performance or sufficient prejudice defeats the ineffective claim." Id. at 700 . | 6 | 2001–2015 |
Thompson v. State
green
2 sentences2015Thompson, 9 S.W.3d at 813-14 . 4. 2015Thompson, 9 S.W.3d at 813-14 . 4. | 2 | 2015–2015 |
Iowa v. Tovar
green
2 sentences2008P. 44.2(a). [29] 41 S.W.3d 228, 235-36 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). [30] Id. at 234 . [31] Id. at 235 . [32] Id. [33] Id. [34] Id. at 236 . [35] Id. [36] Id. [37] Williams, 194 S.W.3d at 578-79 . [38] See Cordova v. Baca, 346 F.3d 924, 926-27 (9th Cir.2003) (discussing the difference between a defective Faretta colloquy and an ineffective waiver of the right to trial counsel and noting the potential application of a harmless error analysis to a defective Faretta colloquy to find an effective waiver); see also United States v. Virgil, 444 F.3d 447, 456-47 (5th Cir.2006) (recognizing 2008P. 44.2(a). [29] 41 S.W.3d 228, 235-36 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). [30] Id. at 234 . [31] Id. at 235 . [32] Id. [33] Id. [34] Id. at 236 . [35] Id. [36] Id. [37] Williams, 194 S.W.3d at 578-79 . [38] See Cordova v. Baca, 346 F.3d 924, 926-27 (9th Cir.2003) (discussing the difference between a defective Faretta colloquy and an ineffective waiver of the right to trial counsel and noting the potential application of a harmless error analysis to a defective Faretta colloquy to find an effective waiver); see also United States v. Virgil, 444 F.3d 447, 456-47 (5th Cir.2006) (recognizing | 2 | 2008–2008 |
Patterson v. Illinois
green
2 sentences2008P. 44.2(a). [29] 41 S.W.3d 228, 235-36 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). [30] Id. at 234 . [31] Id. at 235 . [32] Id. [33] Id. [34] Id. at 236 . [35] Id. [36] Id. [37] Williams, 194 S.W.3d at 578-79 . [38] See Cordova v. Baca, 346 F.3d 924, 926-27 (9th Cir.2003) (discussing the difference between a defective Faretta colloquy and an ineffective waiver of the right to trial counsel and noting the potential application of a harmless error analysis to a defective Faretta colloquy to find an effective waiver); see also United States v. Virgil, 444 F.3d 447, 456-47 (5th Cir.2006) (recognizing 2008P. 44.2(a). [29] 41 S.W.3d 228, 235-36 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). [30] Id. at 234 . [31] Id. at 235 . [32] Id. [33] Id. [34] Id. at 236 . [35] Id. [36] Id. [37] Williams, 194 S.W.3d at 578-79 . [38] See Cordova v. Baca, 346 F.3d 924, 926-27 (9th Cir.2003) (discussing the difference between a defective Faretta colloquy and an ineffective waiver of the right to trial counsel and noting the potential application of a harmless error analysis to a defective Faretta colloquy to find an effective waiver); see also United States v. Virgil, 444 F.3d 447, 456-47 (5th Cir.2006) (recognizing | 2 | 2008–2008 |
Arizona v. Fulminante
green
2 sentences2008P. 44.2(a). [29] 41 S.W.3d 228, 235-36 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). [30] Id. at 234 . [31] Id. at 235 . [32] Id. [33] Id. [34] Id. at 236 . [35] Id. [36] Id. [37] Williams, 194 S.W.3d at 578-79 . [38] See Cordova v. Baca, 346 F.3d 924, 926-27 (9th Cir.2003) (discussing the difference between a defective Faretta colloquy and an ineffective waiver of the right to trial counsel and noting the potential application of a harmless error analysis to a defective Faretta colloquy to find an effective waiver); see also United States v. Virgil, 444 F.3d 447, 456-47 (5th Cir.2006) (recognizing 2008P. 44.2(a). [29] 41 S.W.3d 228, 235-36 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). [30] Id. at 234 . [31] Id. at 235 . [32] Id. [33] Id. [34] Id. at 236 . [35] Id. [36] Id. [37] Williams, 194 S.W.3d at 578-79 . [38] See Cordova v. Baca, 346 F.3d 924, 926-27 (9th Cir.2003) (discussing the difference between a defective Faretta colloquy and an ineffective waiver of the right to trial counsel and noting the potential application of a harmless error analysis to a defective Faretta colloquy to find an effective waiver); see also United States v. Virgil, 444 F.3d 447, 456-47 (5th Cir.2006) (recognizing | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Williams v. State
green
2 sentences2008P. 44.2(a). [29] 41 S.W.3d 228, 235-36 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). [30] Id. at 234 . [31] Id. at 235 . [32] Id. [33] Id. [34] Id. at 236 . [35] Id. [36] Id. [37] Williams, 194 S.W.3d at 578-79 . [38] See Cordova v. Baca, 346 F.3d 924, 926-27 (9th Cir.2003) (discussing the difference between a defective Faretta colloquy and an ineffective waiver of the right to trial counsel and noting the potential application of a harmless error analysis to a defective Faretta colloquy to find an effective waiver); see also United States v. Virgil, 444 F.3d 447, 456-47 (5th Cir.2006) (recognizing 2008P. 44.2(a). [29] 41 S.W.3d 228, 235-36 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). [30] Id. at 234 . [31] Id. at 235 . [32] Id. [33] Id. [34] Id. at 236 . [35] Id. [36] Id. [37] Williams, 194 S.W.3d at 578-79 . [38] See Cordova v. Baca, 346 F.3d 924, 926-27 (9th Cir.2003) (discussing the difference between a defective Faretta colloquy and an ineffective waiver of the right to trial counsel and noting the potential application of a harmless error analysis to a defective Faretta colloquy to find an effective waiver); see also United States v. Virgil, 444 F.3d 447, 456-47 (5th Cir.2006) (recognizing | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Satterwhite v. Texas
green
2 sentences2008P. 44.2(a). [29] 41 S.W.3d 228, 235-36 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). [30] Id. at 234 . [31] Id. at 235 . [32] Id. [33] Id. [34] Id. at 236 . [35] Id. [36] Id. [37] Williams, 194 S.W.3d at 578-79 . [38] See Cordova v. Baca, 346 F.3d 924, 926-27 (9th Cir.2003) (discussing the difference between a defective Faretta colloquy and an ineffective waiver of the right to trial counsel and noting the potential application of a harmless error analysis to a defective Faretta colloquy to find an effective waiver); see also United States v. Virgil, 444 F.3d 447, 456-47 (5th Cir.2006) (recognizing 2008P. 44.2(a). [29] 41 S.W.3d 228, 235-36 (Tex.App.-Fort Worth 2001, pet. ref'd). [30] Id. at 234 . [31] Id. at 235 . [32] Id. [33] Id. [34] Id. at 236 . [35] Id. [36] Id. [37] Williams, 194 S.W.3d at 578-79 . [38] See Cordova v. Baca, 346 F.3d 924, 926-27 (9th Cir.2003) (discussing the difference between a defective Faretta colloquy and an ineffective waiver of the right to trial counsel and noting the potential application of a harmless error analysis to a defective Faretta colloquy to find an effective waiver); see also United States v. Virgil, 444 F.3d 447, 456-47 (5th Cir.2006) (recognizing | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.