12 Virginia opinions name it 1 courts 1998–2019 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Virginia courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Rusty's Welding Service, Inc. v. Gibsongreen2 sentences2019Issue preclusion, or collateral estoppel, is a species of res judicata, AKAK Corp. v. Commonwealth, 38 Va. App. 634, 638-39 (2002), and “[t]he doctrine of res judicata is applicable to decisions of deputy commissioners and the full [C]ommission,” Tyco Elecs. v. Vanpelt, 62 Va. App. 160, 170 (2013) (quoting Rusty’s Welding Serv., Inc. v. Gibson, 29 Va. App. 119, 128 (1999) (en banc)). 2013“The doctrine of res judicata is applicable to decisions of deputy commissioners and the full commission.” *171 Rusty’s Welding Serv., Inc. v. Gibson, 29 Va.App. 119, 128 , 510 S.E.2d 255, 259 (1999) (en banc) (citing K & L Trucking Co., Inc. v. Thurber, 1 Va.App. 213, 219 , 337 S.E.2d 299, 302 (1985)). | 7 | 8 |
K & L TRUCKING, INC. v. Thurbergreen2 sentences2013“The doctrine of res judicata is applicable to decisions of deputy commissioners and the full commission.” *171 Rusty’s Welding Serv., Inc. v. Gibson, 29 Va.App. 119, 128 , 510 S.E.2d 255, 259 (1999) (en banc) (citing K & L Trucking Co., Inc. v. Thurber, 1 Va.App. 213, 219 , 337 S.E.2d 299, 302 (1985)). 2013“The doctrine of res judicata is applicable to decisions of deputy commissioners and the full commission.” *171 Rusty’s Welding Serv., Inc. v. Gibson, 29 Va.App. 119, 128 , 510 S.E.2d 255, 259 (1999) (en banc) (citing K & L Trucking Co., Inc. v. Thurber, 1 Va.App. 213, 219 , 337 S.E.2d 299, 302 (1985)). | 7 | 7 |
Gottlieb v. Gottliebgreen2 sentences2005“The doctrine of res judicata is applicable to decisions of deputy commissioners and the full commission---- [and] ‘precludes the re-litigation of a claim or issue once a final determination on the merits has been reached.’ ” Rusty’s Welding Serv., Inc. v. Gibson, 29 Va.App. 119, 128 , 510 S.E.2d 255, 259 (1999) (en banc) (quoting Gottlieb v. Gottlieb, 19 Va.App. 77, 81 , 448 S.E.2d 666, 669 (1994)). 2005“The doctrine of res judicata is applicable to decisions of deputy commissioners and the full commission---- [and] ‘precludes the re-litigation of a claim or issue once a final determination on the merits has been reached.’ ” Rusty’s Welding Serv., Inc. v. Gibson, 29 Va.App. 119, 128 , 510 S.E.2d 255, 259 (1999) (en banc) (quoting Gottlieb v. Gottlieb, 19 Va.App. 77, 81 , 448 S.E.2d 666, 669 (1994)). | 4 | 4 |
Pruden v. Plasser American Corp.green2 sentences2015“The doctrine of res judicata is applicable to decisions of deputy commissioners and the full [C]ommission. . . . [and] precludes the re-litigation of a claim or issue once a final determination on the merits has been reached.” Pruden, 45 Va. App. at 573 , 612 S.E.2d at 742 (quoting Rusty’s Welding Serv. 2015“The doctrine of res judicata is applicable to decisions of deputy commissioners and the full [C]ommission. . . . [and] precludes the re-litigation of a claim or issue once a final determination on the merits has been reached.” Pruden, 45 Va. App. at 573 , 612 S.E.2d at 742 (quoting Rusty’s Welding Serv. | 2 | 3 |
Sinclair v. Shelter Construction Corp.green2 sentences1999Corp., 23 Va.App. 154, 156-57 , 474 S.E.2d 856, 857-58 (1996). *128 The doctrine of res judicata is applicable to decisions of deputy commissioners and the full commission. 1999Corp., 23 Va.App. 154, 156-57 , 474 S.E.2d 856, 857-58 (1996). *128 The doctrine of res judicata is applicable to decisions of deputy commissioners and the full commission. | 2 | 2 |
Akak, Corp. v. Commonwealthgreen1 sentence2019Issue preclusion, or collateral estoppel, is a species of res judicata, AKAK Corp. v. Commonwealth, 38 Va. App. 634, 638-39 (2002), and “[t]he doctrine of res judicata is applicable to decisions of deputy commissioners and the full [C]ommission,” Tyco Elecs. v. Vanpelt, 62 Va. App. 160, 170 (2013) (quoting Rusty’s Welding Serv., Inc. v. Gibson, 29 Va. App. 119, 128 (1999) (en banc)). | 1 | 1 |
Debra Levy v. Wegmans Food Markets, Inc.green1 sentence2019“The doctrine of res judicata is applicable to decisions of deputy commissioners and the full commission. . . . [and] precludes the re-litigation of a claim or issue once a final determination on the merits has been reached.” Levy v. Wegmans Food Markets, Inc., 68 Va. App. 575, 579 (2018) (quoting Pruden v. Plasser Am. | 1 | 1 |
Tyco Electronics and Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania v. Tony Alvin VanPeltgreen1 sentence2019Issue preclusion, or collateral estoppel, is a species of res judicata, AKAK Corp. v. Commonwealth, 38 Va. App. 634, 638-39 (2002), and “[t]he doctrine of res judicata is applicable to decisions of deputy commissioners and the full [C]ommission,” Tyco Elecs. v. Vanpelt, 62 Va. App. 160, 170 (2013) (quoting Rusty’s Welding Serv., Inc. v. Gibson, 29 Va. App. 119, 128 (1999) (en banc)). | 1 | 1 |
Starbucks Coffee Company and American Zurich Insurance Company v. Kristin Shygreen1 sentence2019“Issue preclusion bars ‘successive litigation of an issue of -7- fact or law actually litigated and resolved in a valid court determination essential to the prior judgment,’ even if the issue recurs in the context of a different claim.” Starbucks Coffee Co. v. Shy, 61 Va. App. 229, 241 (2012) (quoting Brock v. Voith Siemens Hydro Power Generation, 59 Va. App. 39, 45 (2011)). | 1 | 1 |
Brock v. Voith Siemens Hydro Power Generationgreen1 sentence2019“Issue preclusion bars ‘successive litigation of an issue of -7- fact or law actually litigated and resolved in a valid court determination essential to the prior judgment,’ even if the issue recurs in the context of a different claim.” Starbucks Coffee Co. v. Shy, 61 Va. App. 229, 241 (2012) (quoting Brock v. Voith Siemens Hydro Power Generation, 59 Va. App. 39, 45 (2011)). | 1 | 1 |
City of Waynesboro Sheriff's Department v. Hartergreen2 sentences1998Corp., 23 Va. App. 154, 156-57 , 474 S.E.2d 856, 857-58 (1996) (citing City of Waynesboro v. Harter, 1 Va. App. 265, 269 , 337 S.E.2d 901, 903 (1985)). -5- The doctrine of res judicata is applicable to decisions of deputy commissioners and the full commission. 1998Corp., 23 Va. App. 154, 156-57 , 474 S.E.2d 856, 857-58 (1996) (citing City of Waynesboro v. Harter, 1 Va. App. 265, 269 , 337 S.E.2d 901, 903 (1985)). -5- The doctrine of res judicata is applicable to decisions of deputy commissioners and the full commission. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Virginia. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.