12 Wisconsin opinions name it 2 courts 2007–2026 8 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Wisconsin courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Jorgensengreen2 sentences2026Instead, “‘the existence of plain error will turn on the facts of the particular case.’” State v. Jorgensen, 2008 WI 60, ¶22 , 310 Wis. 2d 138 , 754 N.W.2d 77 (quoting Mayo, 301 Wis. 2d 642, ¶29 ). 2026Instead, “‘the existence of plain error will turn on the facts of the particular case.’” State v. Jorgensen, 2008 WI 60, ¶22 , 310 Wis. 2d 138 , 754 N.W.2d 77 (quoting Mayo, 301 Wis. 2d 642, ¶29 ). | 3 | 7 |
State v. Mayogreen2 sentences2026Instead, “‘the existence of plain error will turn on the facts of the particular case.’” State v. Jorgensen, 2008 WI 60, ¶22 , 310 Wis. 2d 138 , 754 N.W.2d 77 (quoting Mayo, 301 Wis. 2d 642, ¶29 ). 2025Instead, “the existence of plain error will turn on the facts of the particular case.” State v. Jorgensen, 2008 WI 60, ¶22 , 310 Wis. 2d 138 , 754 N.W.2d 77 (quoting Mayo, 301 Wis. 2d 642, ¶29 ). | 1 | 7 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Wisconsin. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Virgil v. State
green
2 sentences2008Id. (citing Virgil v. State, 84 Wis.2d 166, 195 , 267 N.W.2d 852 (1978)) (Beilfuss, C.J., concurring); "Wisconsin courts have consistently used this constitutional error standard in determining whether to invoke the plain error rule." State v. King, 205 Wis.2d 81, 91 , 555 N.W.2d 189 (Ct.App.1996) (citing to a number of Wisconsin cases applying the plain error doctrine). ¶ 22 However, "`the existence of plain error will turn on the facts of the particular case.'" Mayo, 301 Wis.2d 642, ¶ 29 , 734 N.W.2d 115 (citing Virgil, 84 Wis.2d at 190-91 , 267 N.W.2d 852 ). 2008Id. (citing Virgil v. State, 84 Wis.2d 166, 195 , 267 N.W.2d 852 (1978)) (Beilfuss, C.J., concurring); "Wisconsin courts have consistently used this constitutional error standard in determining whether to invoke the plain error rule." State v. King, 205 Wis.2d 81, 91 , 555 N.W.2d 189 (Ct.App.1996) (citing to a number of Wisconsin cases applying the plain error doctrine). ¶ 22 However, "`the existence of plain error will turn on the facts of the particular case.'" Mayo, 301 Wis.2d 642, ¶ 29 , 734 N.W.2d 115 (citing Virgil, 84 Wis.2d at 190-91 , 267 N.W.2d 852 ). | 4 | 2007–2011 |
State v. King
green
2 sentences2008Id. (citing Virgil v. State, 84 Wis.2d 166, 195 , 267 N.W.2d 852 (1978)) (Beilfuss, C.J., concurring); "Wisconsin courts have consistently used this constitutional error standard in determining whether to invoke the plain error rule." State v. King, 205 Wis.2d 81, 91 , 555 N.W.2d 189 (Ct.App.1996) (citing to a number of Wisconsin cases applying the plain error doctrine). ¶ 22 However, "`the existence of plain error will turn on the facts of the particular case.'" Mayo, 301 Wis.2d 642, ¶ 29 , 734 N.W.2d 115 (citing Virgil, 84 Wis.2d at 190-91 , 267 N.W.2d 852 ). 2008Id. (citing Virgil v. State, 84 Wis.2d 166, 195 , 267 N.W.2d 852 (1978)) (Beilfuss, C.J., concurring); "Wisconsin courts have consistently used this constitutional error standard in determining whether to invoke the plain error rule." State v. King, 205 Wis.2d 81, 91 , 555 N.W.2d 189 (Ct.App.1996) (citing to a number of Wisconsin cases applying the plain error doctrine). ¶ 22 However, "`the existence of plain error will turn on the facts of the particular case.'" Mayo, 301 Wis.2d 642, ¶ 29 , 734 N.W.2d 115 (citing Virgil, 84 Wis.2d at 190-91 , 267 N.W.2d 852 ). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
State v. Sonnenberg
green
1 sentence2008Id. (citing Virgil v. State, 84 Wis.2d 166, 195 , 267 N.W.2d 852 (1978)) (Beilfuss, C.J., concurring); "Wisconsin courts have consistently used this constitutional error standard in determining whether to invoke the plain error rule." State v. King, 205 Wis.2d 81, 91 , 555 N.W.2d 189 (Ct.App.1996) (citing to a number of Wisconsin cases applying the plain error doctrine). ¶ 22 However, "`the existence of plain error will turn on the facts of the particular case.'" Mayo, 301 Wis.2d 642, ¶ 29 , 734 N.W.2d 115 (citing Virgil, 84 Wis.2d at 190-91 , 267 N.W.2d 852 ). | 1 | 2008–2008 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.