fifteen year requirement (Connecticut) · Go Syfert
← Connecticut issues

fifteen year requirement in Connecticut

11 Connecticut opinions name it 3 courts 1995–2025 5 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Connecticut courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (4)

CaseFollowedCited
Smith v. Chapingreen
conn · 1863 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2006–2024
2 sentences

2024Such a posses- sion is not to be made out by inference, but by clear and positive proof.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Dowling v. Heirs of Bond, 345 Conn. 119, 143 , 282 A.3d 1201 (2022). ‘‘It is sufficient if there is an adverse possession con- tinued uninterruptedly for fifteen years whether by one or more persons. . . . [T]he possession [however] must be connected and continuous . . . .’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Har v. Boreiko, 118 Conn. App. 787, 799 , 986 A.2d 1072 (2010). ‘‘If one party’s period of use or possession is insufficient to satisfy the fifteen year requirem

2011Smith v. Chapin, 31 Conn. 530, 531-32 (1863) . . . .” (Citations omitted; internal quotation marks omitted.) McBurney v. Cirillo, 276 Conn. 782, 813 , 889 A.2d 759 (2006), overruled on other grounds by Batte-Holmgren v. Commissioner of Public Health, 281 Conn. 277, 284-89 , 914 A.2d 996 (2007).

23
Caminis v. Troygreen
conn · 2011 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2018–2024
2 sentences

2024Such a posses- sion is not to be made out by inference, but by clear and positive proof.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Dowling v. Heirs of Bond, 345 Conn. 119, 143 , 282 A.3d 1201 (2022). ‘‘It is sufficient if there is an adverse possession con- tinued uninterruptedly for fifteen years whether by one or more persons. . . . [T]he possession [however] must be connected and continuous . . . .’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Har v. Boreiko, 118 Conn. App. 787, 799 , 986 A.2d 1072 (2010). ‘‘If one party’s period of use or possession is insufficient to satisfy the fifteen year requirem

2024Such a posses- sion is not to be made out by inference, but by clear and positive proof.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Dowling v. Heirs of Bond, 345 Conn. 119, 143 , 282 A.3d 1201 (2022). ‘‘It is sufficient if there is an adverse possession con- tinued uninterruptedly for fifteen years whether by one or more persons. . . . [T]he possession [however] must be connected and continuous . . . .’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Har v. Boreiko, 118 Conn. App. 787, 799 , 986 A.2d 1072 (2010). ‘‘If one party’s period of use or possession is insufficient to satisfy the fifteen year requirem

13
McBurney v. Cirillogreen
conn · 2006 · cited in 3 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2009–2024
2 sentences

2009The defendant makes no claim on appeal with respect to that finding. 2 General Statutes § 47-37 provides: “No person may acquire a right-of-way or any other easement from, in, upon or over the land of another, by *192 the adverse use or enjoyment thereof, unless the use has been continued uninterrupted for fifteen years.” 3 We note that “[i]f one party’s period of use or possession is insufficient to satisfy the fifteen year requirement, that party may ‘tack on’ the period of use or possession of someone who is in privity with the party, a relationship that may be established by showing a tran

2009The defendant makes no claim on appeal with respect to that finding. 2 General Statutes § 47-37 provides: “No person may acquire a right-of-way or any other easement from, in, upon or over the land of another, by *192 the adverse use or enjoyment thereof, unless the use has been continued uninterrupted for fifteen years.” 3 We note that “[i]f one party’s period of use or possession is insufficient to satisfy the fifteen year requirement, that party may ‘tack on’ the period of use or possession of someone who is in privity with the party, a relationship that may be established by showing a tran

13
Batte-Holmgren v. Commissioner of Public Healthgreen
conn · 2007 · cited in 2 Connecticut opinions naming this issue, 2011–2024
2 sentences

2024See McBurney v. Cirillo, 276 Conn. 782, 813 , 889 A.2d 759 (2006), overruled on other grounds by Batte-Holmgren v. Commissioner of Public Health, 281 Conn. 277 , 914 A.2d 996 (2007).

2024See McBurney v. Cirillo, 276 Conn. 782, 813 , 889 A.2d 759 (2006), overruled on other grounds by Batte-Holmgren v. Commissioner of Public Health, 281 Conn. 277 , 914 A.2d 996 (2007).

12

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Connecticut. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (10)

CaseCitedYears
Mulle v. McCauley green
connappct · 2007
2 sentences

2025If one party’s period of use or possession is insufficient to satisfy the fifteen year requirement, that party may tack on the period of use or possession of someone who is in privity with the party, a relationship that may be established by showing a transfer of possession rights.’’ (Citation omitted; inter- nal quotation marks omitted.) Supronowicz v. Eaton, 224 Conn. App. 66, 75 , 312 A.3d 100 , cert. denied, 349 Conn. 904 , 312 A.3d 1057 (2024). ‘‘It is well established that one claiming title to real property by adverse possession must prove by clear and positive evidence each element of

2025If one party’s period of use or possession is insufficient to satisfy the fifteen year requirement, that party may tack on the period of use or possession of someone who is in privity with the party, a relationship that may be established by showing a transfer of possession rights.’’ (Citation omitted; inter- nal quotation marks omitted.) Supronowicz v. Eaton, 224 Conn. App. 66, 75 , 312 A.3d 100 , cert. denied, 349 Conn. 904 , 312 A.3d 1057 (2024). ‘‘It is well established that one claiming title to real property by adverse possession must prove by clear and positive evidence each element of

22025–2025
Lisiewski v. Seidel green
connappct · 2006
2 sentences

2025If one party’s period of use or possession is insufficient to satisfy the fifteen year requirement, that party may tack on the period of use or possession of someone who is in privity with the party, a relationship that may be established by showing a transfer of possession rights.’’ (Citation omitted; inter- nal quotation marks omitted.) Supronowicz v. Eaton, 224 Conn. App. 66, 75 , 312 A.3d 100 , cert. denied, 349 Conn. 904 , 312 A.3d 1057 (2024). ‘‘It is well established that one claiming title to real property by adverse possession must prove by clear and positive evidence each element of

2025If one party’s period of use or possession is insufficient to satisfy the fifteen year requirement, that party may tack on the period of use or possession of someone who is in privity with the party, a relationship that may be established by showing a transfer of possession rights.’’ (Citation omitted; inter- nal quotation marks omitted.) Supronowicz v. Eaton, 224 Conn. App. 66, 75 , 312 A.3d 100 , cert. denied, 349 Conn. 904 , 312 A.3d 1057 (2024). ‘‘It is well established that one claiming title to real property by adverse possession must prove by clear and positive evidence each element of

22025–2025
Mitchell v. Medical Inter-Insurance Exchange green
conn · 2007
2 sentences

2025If one party’s period of use or possession is insufficient to satisfy the fifteen year requirement, that party may tack on the period of use or possession of someone who is in privity with the party, a relationship that may be established by showing a transfer of possession rights.’’ (Citation omitted; inter- nal quotation marks omitted.) Supronowicz v. Eaton, 224 Conn. App. 66, 75 , 312 A.3d 100 , cert. denied, 349 Conn. 904 , 312 A.3d 1057 (2024). ‘‘It is well established that one claiming title to real property by adverse possession must prove by clear and positive evidence each element of

2025If one party’s period of use or possession is insufficient to satisfy the fifteen year requirement, that party may tack on the period of use or possession of someone who is in privity with the party, a relationship that may be established by showing a transfer of possession rights.’’ (Citation omitted; inter- nal quotation marks omitted.) Supronowicz v. Eaton, 224 Conn. App. 66, 75 , 312 A.3d 100 , cert. denied, 349 Conn. 904 , 312 A.3d 1057 (2024). ‘‘It is well established that one claiming title to real property by adverse possession must prove by clear and positive evidence each element of

22025–2025
Mulle v. McCauley green
conn · 2007
2 sentences

2025If one party’s period of use or possession is insufficient to satisfy the fifteen year requirement, that party may tack on the period of use or possession of someone who is in privity with the party, a relationship that may be established by showing a transfer of possession rights.’’ (Citation omitted; inter- nal quotation marks omitted.) Supronowicz v. Eaton, 224 Conn. App. 66, 75 , 312 A.3d 100 , cert. denied, 349 Conn. 904 , 312 A.3d 1057 (2024). ‘‘It is well established that one claiming title to real property by adverse possession must prove by clear and positive evidence each element of

2025If one party’s period of use or possession is insufficient to satisfy the fifteen year requirement, that party may tack on the period of use or possession of someone who is in privity with the party, a relationship that may be established by showing a transfer of possession rights.’’ (Citation omitted; inter- nal quotation marks omitted.) Supronowicz v. Eaton, 224 Conn. App. 66, 75 , 312 A.3d 100 , cert. denied, 349 Conn. 904 , 312 A.3d 1057 (2024). ‘‘It is well established that one claiming title to real property by adverse possession must prove by clear and positive evidence each element of

22025–2025
Supronowicz v. Eaton green
connappct · 2024
2 sentences

2025If one party’s period of use or possession is insufficient to satisfy the fifteen year requirement, that party may tack on the period of use or possession of someone who is in privity with the party, a relationship that may be established by showing a transfer of possession rights.’’ (Citation omitted; inter- nal quotation marks omitted.) Supronowicz v. Eaton, 224 Conn. App. 66, 75 , 312 A.3d 100 , cert. denied, 349 Conn. 904 , 312 A.3d 1057 (2024). ‘‘It is well established that one claiming title to real property by adverse possession must prove by clear and positive evidence each element of

2025If one party’s period of use or possession is insufficient to satisfy the fifteen year requirement, that party may tack on the period of use or possession of someone who is in privity with the party, a relationship that may be established by showing a transfer of possession rights.’’ (Citation omitted; inter- nal quotation marks omitted.) Supronowicz v. Eaton, 224 Conn. App. 66, 75 , 312 A.3d 100 , cert. denied, 349 Conn. 904 , 312 A.3d 1057 (2024). ‘‘It is well established that one claiming title to real property by adverse possession must prove by clear and positive evidence each element of

22025–2025
Marquis v. Drost green
conn · 1967
2 sentences

1997Marquis v. Dros , 155 Conn. 327 , 231 A.2d 527 (1967).

1997Marquis v. Dros , 155 Conn. 327 , 231 A.2d 527 (1967).

21995–1997
Har v. Boreiko green
connappct · 2010
2 sentences

2024Such a posses- sion is not to be made out by inference, but by clear and positive proof.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Dowling v. Heirs of Bond, 345 Conn. 119, 143 , 282 A.3d 1201 (2022). ‘‘It is sufficient if there is an adverse possession con- tinued uninterruptedly for fifteen years whether by one or more persons. . . . [T]he possession [however] must be connected and continuous . . . .’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Har v. Boreiko, 118 Conn. App. 787, 799 , 986 A.2d 1072 (2010). ‘‘If one party’s period of use or possession is insufficient to satisfy the fifteen year requirem

2024Such a posses- sion is not to be made out by inference, but by clear and positive proof.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Dowling v. Heirs of Bond, 345 Conn. 119, 143 , 282 A.3d 1201 (2022). ‘‘It is sufficient if there is an adverse possession con- tinued uninterruptedly for fifteen years whether by one or more persons. . . . [T]he possession [however] must be connected and continuous . . . .’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Har v. Boreiko, 118 Conn. App. 787, 799 , 986 A.2d 1072 (2010). ‘‘If one party’s period of use or possession is insufficient to satisfy the fifteen year requirem

12024–2024
Dowling v. Heirs of Bond green
conn · 2022
1 sentence

2024Such a posses- sion is not to be made out by inference, but by clear and positive proof.’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Dowling v. Heirs of Bond, 345 Conn. 119, 143 , 282 A.3d 1201 (2022). ‘‘It is sufficient if there is an adverse possession con- tinued uninterruptedly for fifteen years whether by one or more persons. . . . [T]he possession [however] must be connected and continuous . . . .’’ (Internal quotation marks omitted.) Har v. Boreiko, 118 Conn. App. 787, 799 , 986 A.2d 1072 (2010). ‘‘If one party’s period of use or possession is insufficient to satisfy the fifteen year requirem

12024–2024
American Trading Real Estate Properties, Inc. v. Town of Trumbull green
conn · 1990
2 sentences

2011“It is well established that ‘[t]itle to realty held in fee by a state or any of its subdivisions for a public use cannot be acquired by adverse possession.’ ” American Trading Real Estate Properties, Inc. v. Trumbull, 215 Conn. 68, 77 , 574 A.2d 796 (1990). 14 Because the defendants did not purchase the property until 1991, they must “tack on” their adverse possession of the contested littoral area with that of Morgan, their predecessor in title, in order to satisfy the fifteen year requirement set forth in § 52-575.

2011“It is well established that ‘[t]itle to realty held in fee by a state or any of its subdivisions for a public use cannot be acquired by adverse possession.’ ” American Trading Real Estate Properties, Inc. v. Trumbull, 215 Conn. 68, 77 , 574 A.2d 796 (1990). 14 Because the defendants did not purchase the property until 1991, they must “tack on” their adverse possession of the contested littoral area with that of Morgan, their predecessor in title, in order to satisfy the fifteen year requirement set forth in § 52-575.

12011–2011
Swenson v. Dittner green
conn · 1981
2 sentences

2009The essential elements are a use which is open, visible, continuous and uninterrupted for fifteen years and made under a claim of right.” (Citations omitted.) Swenson v. Dittner, 183 Conn. 289, 294 , 439 A.2d 334 (1981).

2009The essential elements are a use which is open, visible, continuous and uninterrupted for fifteen years and made under a claim of right.” (Citations omitted.) Swenson v. Dittner, 183 Conn. 289, 294 , 439 A.2d 334 (1981).

12009–2009

Statutes the citing opinions construe

CT § Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-575 (5)

Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check