11 Iowa opinions name it 2 courts 1918–2024 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Iowa courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Milesgreen2 sentences1989When deciding the second component of a claim of ineffective assistance, we have required the person making the claim to show that counsel’s failure to perform an essential duty worked to the client’s actual and substantial disadvantage, thereby constituting “a denial of the accused’s due process right to a fair trial, a fundamental miscarriage of justice, or an equivalent constitutional deprivation.” State v. Miles, 344 N.W.2d 231, 234 (Iowa 1984). 1988When deciding the second component of a claim of ineffective assistance, we have required the person making the claim to show that counsel’s failure to perform an essential duty worked to the client’s actual and substantial disadvantage, thereby constituting “a denial of the accused’s due process right to a fair trial, a fundamental miscarriage of justice, or an equivalent constitutional deprivation.” State v. Miles, 344 N.W.2d 231, 234 (Iowa 1984). | 6 | 6 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Iowa. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Voss v. State, Iowa Department of Transportation
green
2 sentences2017Id. at 881 . 2015A person making a claim under the tort claims act must be the real party in interest—“the one to whom the State would be liable if it were sued in court as a private person.” Voss, 553 N.W.2d at 880 . | 3 | 2015–2017 |
Strickland v. Washington
green
2 sentences1989The crux of the prejudice component rests on whether the defendant has shown “that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694 , 104 S.Ct. at 2069 , 80 L.Ed. at 698. 1989The crux of the prejudice component rests on whether the defendant has shown “that there is a reasonable probability that, but for counsel’s unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.” Strickland, 466 U.S. at 694 , 104 S.Ct. at 2069 , 80 L.Ed. at 698. | 2 | 1988–1989 |
Deborah E. McFadden, Individually and as Administrator of the Estate of Charles Walter McFadden, Jr. v. Department of Transportation, State of Iowa
green
1 sentence2024For instance, rule 1.3 requires claims to state “the name, address, telephone number, and age of the person making the claim.” McFadden, 877 N.W.2d at 123 (quoting Iowa Admin. | 1 | 2024–2024 |
State v. Halstead
green
1 sentence1986Halstead, 362 N.W.2d at 508 . *234 In determining whether defendant was prejudiced by his counsel’s performance, we require the person making the claim to show counsel’s failure to perform an essential duty worked to the client’s actual and substantial disadvantage. | 1 | 1986–1986 |
Bank of Bushnell v. Buck Bros.
neutral
1 sentence1918They cite Bank of Bushnell v. Buck Bros., 161 Iowa 362 ; Merchants Nat. | 1 | 1918–1918 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.