Already have an account? Sign in instead.
You stay signed in for 30 days on this browser.
Continue with Google Continue with MicrosoftNo account yet? Create a free one.
We sent a six-digit code.
It expires in ten minutes, works once, and only in this browser. Five wrong tries void it. Send another code.
Your account is live and the Cloudflare checks are off for this browser.
7 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 1987–2006 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Peters v. Kiffgreen2 sentences1987The court rejected this contention, stating: “[WJhen a grand or petit jury has been selected on an impermissible basis, the existence of a constitutional violation does not depend on the circumstances of the person making the claim,” and “whatever his race, a criminal defendant has standing to challenge the system used to select his grand or petit jury, on the ground that it arbitrarily excludes from service the members of any race, and thereby denies him due process of law.” (Emphasis added.) 407 U.S. 493 , 498, 504, 33 L. 1987The court rejected this contention, stating: “[WJhen a grand or petit jury has been selected on an impermissible basis, the existence of a constitutional violation does not depend on the circumstances of the person making the claim,” and “whatever his race, a criminal defendant has standing to challenge the system used to select his grand or petit jury, on the ground that it arbitrarily excludes from service the members of any race, and thereby denies him due process of law.” (Emphasis added.) 407 U.S. 493 , 498, 504, 33 L. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Pyle v. Murphy
green
2 sentences2006Pyle, 180 Ill. 2006Pyle, 180 Ill.App. at 26 . | 3 | 2006–2006 |
United States v. Robert J. Rippee
green
2 sentences2002Defendant maintains that he never sought to gain something of value in impersonating a police officer but, at most, engaged in mere "puffing." Defendant cites a federal case, United States v. Rippee , 961 F.2d 677 (7th Cir. 1992), in support of this argument. 2002Defendant maintains that he never sought to gain something of value in impersonating a police officer but, at most, engaged in mere “puffing.” Defendant cites a federal case, United States v. Rippee, 961 F.2d 677 (7th Cir. 1992), in support of this argument. | 2 | 2002–2002 |
Kunkel v. Walton
green
2 sentences2002Lastly, Dempsey addresses the plaintiffs argument at the trial level that the Illinois Supreme Court, in Kunkel v. Walton, 179 Ill. 2d 519 (1997), held that even a person making a claim for bodily injury or disease still has the right to privacy. 2002In Kunkel, the court declared section 2 — 1103(a) of the Illinois Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2—1103(a) (West 1996)) to be unconstitutional for mandating that “[a]ny party who by pleading alleges any claim for bodily injury or disease, including mental health injury or disease, shall be deemed to waive any privilege between the injured person and each health care provider who has furnished care at any time to the injured person.” (Emphasis added.) The court found that “ ‘[a] person has a reasonable expectation that he will not be forced to submit to a close scrutiny of his personal cha | 1 | 2002–2002 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.