11 Illinois opinions name it 1 courts 2004–2022 1 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Illinois courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. Cardegnagreen2 sentences2011Buckeye, 546 U.S. at 445-46 , 126 S.Ct. 1204 . 2011Buckeye, 546 U.S. at 445-46 . 28 What Buckeye Check Cashing does not address is what happens if the challenge is to both the contract as a whole and the validity of the arbitration clause. | 2 | 4 |
In re the Arbitration between Teleserve Systems, Inc. & MCI Telecommunications Corp.green2 sentences2005See also In re Arbitration Between Teleserve Systems, Inc. & MCI Telecommunications Corp. , 230 A.D.2d 585, 592 , 659 N.Y.S.2d 659, 664 (1997) ("under either Federal or New York law, to the extent that petitioner challenges the arbitration clauses themselves or their inclusion in the agreements, those challenges are for the court to determine"). 2005See also In re Arbitration Between Teleserve Systems, Inc. & MCI Telecommunications Corp. , 230 A.D.2d 585, 592 , 659 N.Y.S.2d 659, 664 (1997) ("under either Federal or New York law, to the extent that petitioner challenges the arbitration clauses themselves or their inclusion in the agreements, those challenges are for the court to determine"). | 2 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Illinois. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Bank of Lyons v. Schultz
green
2 sentences2005This is not a case where a wrongful injunction resulted in restricted access to a party's assets or a seizure of his property rights, as was displayed in Bank of Lyons v. Schultz , 78 Ill. 2d 235 , 399 N.E.2d 1286 (1980) (the wrongful issuance of a preliminary injunction prevented the plaintiff from using life insurance proceeds for more than nine years). 2005This is not a case where a wrongful injunction resulted in restricted access to a party's assets or a seizure of his property rights, as was displayed in Bank of Lyons v. Schultz , 78 Ill. 2d 235 , 399 N.E.2d 1286 (1980) (the wrongful issuance of a preliminary injunction prevented the plaintiff from using life insurance proceeds for more than nine years). | 2 | 2005–2005 |
Frank H. Boomer, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. At & T Corporation, a New York Corporation
green
2 sentences2004Boomer , 309 F.3d at 417 . 2004Boomer, 309 F.3d at 417 . | 2 | 2004–2004 |
Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson
green
2 sentences2022In Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. Jackson, the Court explained that “[t]he delegation provision is an agreement to arbitrate threshold issues concerning the arbitration agreement.” Rent-A-Center, 561 U.S. at 68 . 7 ¶ 21 At issue in Rent-A-Center was whether the delegation of the validity of the arbitration clause to an arbitrator, pursuant to the terms of the arbitration agreement, was enforceable. 2022Id. at 72 . | 1 | 2022–2022 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.