6 Missouri opinions name it 2 courts 2004–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Missouri courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Hansengreen2 sentences2007Corp., 785 S.W.2d at 112, and to compel arbitration or stay pending court proceedings. 2004Corp., 785 S.W.2d at 112 , and to compel arbitration or stay pending court proceedings. | 1 | 3 |
Deiab v. Shawgreen2 sentences2008Deiab v. Shaw, 138 S.W.3d 741, 743 (Mo.App. 2006Id. | 1 | 2 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Missouri. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Preston v. Ferrer
green
2 sentences2016And when parties commit to arbitrate contractual disputes, it is a mainstay of the Act’s substantive law that attacks on the validity of the contract, as distinct from attacks on the validity of the arbitration clause itself are to be resolved “by the arbitrator in the fírst instance, not by a federal or state court.” Preston v. Ferrer, 552 U.S. 346, 349 , 128 S.Ct. 978 , 169 L.Ed.2d 917 (2008); see also Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. 2016And when parties commit to arbitrate contractual disputes, it is a mainstay of the Act’s substantive law that attacks on the validity of the contract, as distinct from attacks on the validity of the arbitration clause itself are to be resolved “by the arbitrator in the fírst instance, not by a federal or state court.” Preston v. Ferrer, 552 U.S. 346, 349 , 128 S.Ct. 978 , 169 L.Ed.2d 917 (2008); see also Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.
green
2 sentences2016Co., 388 U.S. 395 ; 87 S.Ct. 1801 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1270 (1967). 2016Co., 388 U.S. 395 ; 87 S.Ct. 1801 , 18 L.Ed.2d 1270 (1967). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.