11 Indiana opinions name it 2 courts 1974–2014 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Indiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Games v. Stategreen2 sentences1998Rejecting this different outcome or “but for” test, we held that the defendant “must convince this Court that there is no evidence presented which supported a murder conviction and that, as a whole, the evidence leads unerringly and unmistakably to a decision that his conviction for murder was unfair and unreliable.” Games , 684 N.E.2d at 469 (footnote omitted). 1997Rejecting this different outcome or “but for” test, we held that the defendant “must convince this Court that there is no evidence presented which supported a murder conviction and that, as a whole, the evidence leads unerringly and unmistakably to a decision that his conviction for murder was unfair and unreliable.” Games, 684 N.E.2d at 469 (footnote omitted). | 2 | 2 |
Vanzandt v. Stategreen1 sentence2014Id. against [the victim] was that exerted to accomplish the robbery.” 731 N.E.2d 450, 455 (Ind. Ct. App. 2000), trans. denied. | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Indiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Miller v. State
green
2 sentences2014Id. 2014Id. | 2 | 2014–2014 |
Berry v. State
neutral
2 sentences2012In rejecting this argument, our supreme court held that “[t]he court may permit the jury to take with them to their room, when they retire for deliberation, the pleadings in the cause, including all of the counts of the indictment or affidavit, even though the prosecutor may have elected to stand on parts of the counts only.” Id., 148 N.E. at 145 . 2012In rejecting this argument, our supreme court held that “[t]he court may permit the jury to take with them to their room, when they retire for deliberation, the pleadings in the cause, including all of the counts of the indictment or affidavit, even though the prosecutor may have elected to stand on parts of the counts only.” Id., 148 N.E. at 145 . | 2 | 2012–2012 |
Small v. State
green
2 sentences2011In Small v. State, 736 N.E.2d 742 (Ind.2000), the defendant claimed error in admitting and providing the jury with copies of transcripts of the defendant's recorded statement to police. 2011This Court noted pri- or case law to the effect that a transcript normally should be used "only to assist the jury as it listens to the tape," but that there may be a need for transcripts due to *507 "inaudibility of portions of the tape," and that the jury should be instructed to "rely on what they hear rather than on what they read when there is a difference." Id. at 748 . | 1 | 2011–2011 |
Jones v. State
green
1 sentence1992This issue was dealt with in Jones v. State (1988), Ind., 517 N.E.2d 405 , when the defendant claimed error in the judge’s denial of his instruction informing the jury that if two conclusions could be reasonably drawn from the evidence, and one of those conclusions favored his innocence, then the jury must find him not guilty. | 1 | 1992–1992 |
State v. Obrigewitch
green
1 sentence1985In holding the trial court's action was not erroneous, the supreme court said: "By so concluding we intend to further the policy of avoiding waste of time and money that would result in requiring manual signing of every record certified from the Drivers License Division." 356 N.W.2d at 108 . | 1 | 1985–1985 |
Whitacre v. State
green
1 sentence1980In Whitacre v. State, (1980) Ind., 412 N.E.2d 1202 the defendant claimed error in the court’s refusal of his tendered instruction on guilty knowledge. | 1 | 1980–1980 |
Koerner v. State
green
1 sentence1974Koerner, supra, in no way mandated the giving of an instruction similar to that requested in the instant case. | 1 | 1974–1974 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.