11 Louisiana opinions name it 2 courts 1978–2010 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Louisiana courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
State v. Langloisgreen1 sentence1994See State v. Langlois, supra (ordering the trial court to make funds available for defense expenses "for the purpose set forth in the in chambers showing made in the trial court"); State v. Benoit, 576 So.2d 41 (La.1991) (per curiam) (granting defendant's request for an ex parte hearing on her application for funds for expert assistance); State v. Larson, 548 So.2d 945 (La. 1989) (per curiam) (reversing a trial court's ruling to unseal the record of an in camera ex parte hearing on defendant's application for funds for expert assistance); State v. Madison, supra, (positing that problems of rev | 1 | 1 |
State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Smithgreen2 sentences1993Stephan v. Smith, 242 Kan. 336 , 747 P.2d 816 (1986) ("the emerging view is that the responsibility to provide ... [for indigent defense] is a public responsibility that is not to be borne entirely by the private bar"). 1993Stephan v. Smith, 242 Kan. 336 , 747 P.2d 816 (1986) ("the emerging view is that the responsibility to provide ... [for indigent defense] is a public responsibility that is not to be borne entirely by the private bar"). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Louisiana. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
State v. Wigley
green
2 sentences2010Moreover, the court instructed that “[i]f the district judge determines that funds are not available to reimburse appointed counsel, he should not appoint members of the private bar to represent indigents.” Id. 2009Moreover, the court instructed that “[i]f the district judge determines that funds are not available to reimburse appointed counsel, he should not appoint members of the private bar to represent indigents.” Id. | 7 | 1999–2010 |
State v. Madison
green
1 sentence1994See State v. Langlois, supra (ordering the trial court to make funds available for defense expenses "for the purpose set forth in the in chambers showing made in the trial court"); State v. Benoit, 576 So.2d 41 (La.1991) (per curiam) (granting defendant's request for an ex parte hearing on her application for funds for expert assistance); State v. Larson, 548 So.2d 945 (La. 1989) (per curiam) (reversing a trial court's ruling to unseal the record of an in camera ex parte hearing on defendant's application for funds for expert assistance); State v. Madison, supra, (positing that problems of rev | 1 | 1994–1994 |
State v. Larson
neutral
1 sentence1994See State v. Langlois, supra (ordering the trial court to make funds available for defense expenses "for the purpose set forth in the in chambers showing made in the trial court"); State v. Benoit, 576 So.2d 41 (La.1991) (per curiam) (granting defendant's request for an ex parte hearing on her application for funds for expert assistance); State v. Larson, 548 So.2d 945 (La. 1989) (per curiam) (reversing a trial court's ruling to unseal the record of an in camera ex parte hearing on defendant's application for funds for expert assistance); State v. Madison, supra, (positing that problems of rev | 1 | 1994–1994 |
State ex rel. Green v. Whitley
neutral
1 sentence1994See State v. Langlois, supra (ordering the trial court to make funds available for defense expenses "for the purpose set forth in the in chambers showing made in the trial court"); State v. Benoit, 576 So.2d 41 (La.1991) (per curiam) (granting defendant's request for an ex parte hearing on her application for funds for expert assistance); State v. Larson, 548 So.2d 945 (La. 1989) (per curiam) (reversing a trial court's ruling to unseal the record of an in camera ex parte hearing on defendant's application for funds for expert assistance); State v. Madison, supra, (positing that problems of rev | 1 | 1994–1994 |
In re Investigation of Alleged Violation of the Code of Governmental Ethics by Theriot
neutral
1 sentence1984In In Re Theriot, 257 So.2d 770 (La.App. 1st Cir.1972), this court clearly set forth the distinction between investigations and hearings. 7 Investigations are “carried out by the Commission personnel” and contemplate hearsay results, while hearings contemplate proceedings held by the Commission to receive “primary evidence, testimonial or otherwise, rather than the hearsay results” of investigations. | 1 | 1984–1984 |
Oliver v. Shreveport Municipal Fire & Police Civil Service Board
neutral
2 sentences1978Oliver v. Shreveport Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board, 227 La. 1067 , 81 So.2d 398 (1954). 1978Oliver v. Shreveport Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board, 227 La. 1067 , 81 So.2d 398 (1954). | 1 | 1978–1978 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.