11 Texas opinions name it 2 courts 2008–2026 5 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
In Re General Electric Capital Corporationgreen2 sentences2011Implied waiver of a party's right that is remediable by mandamus, as the Texas Supreme Court has emphasized in decisions since Rivercenter , is not a function of the passage of time in and of itself, though the passage of time may be relevant, but more generally of facts and circumstances that "clearly demonstrate[]" the party's intent to waive its right through "either the intentional relinquishment of a known right" or intentional conduct "unequivocally inconsistent with claiming a known right." In re Gen'l Electric Capital Corp. , 203 S.W.3d 314 , 316 (Tex. 2006) (orig. proceeding) (citatio 2011Implied waiver of a party’s right that is remediable by mandamus, as the Texas Supreme Court has emphasized in decisions since Rivercenter, is not a function of the passage of time in and of itself, though the passage of time may be relevant, but more generally of facts and circumstances that “clearly demonstrate! ]” the party’s intent to waive its right through “either the intentional relinquishment of a known right” or intentional conduct “unequivocally inconsistent with claiming a known right.” In re Gen’l Electric Capital Corp., 203 S.W.3d 314, 316 (Tex.2006) (orig. proceeding) (citations | 2 | 3 |
In re Lonestar Logo & Signs, LLCgreen2 sentences2026See In re LoneStar Logo, 552 S.W.3d at 353 (granting mandamus relief in derivative suit and collecting cases of courts doing the same). 2026See In re LoneStar Logo, 552 S.W.3d at 353 (granting mandamus relief in derivative suit and collecting cases of courts doing the same). | 2 | 2 |
In Re Dana Corp.green2 sentences2024See In re Dana Corp., 138 S.W.3d 298, 301 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding) (“If an appellate court cannot remedy a trial court’s discovery error, then an adequate appellate remedy does not exist.”). 2024See In re Dana Corp., 138 S.W.3d 298, 301 (Tex. 2004) (orig. proceeding) (“If an appellate court cannot remedy a trial court’s discovery error, then an adequate appellate remedy does not exist.”). | 2 | 2 |
In Re Nancegreen2 sentences2008See, e.g., In re Nance, 143 S.W.3d at 510 ; In re Highland Pines Nursing Home, Ltd., No. 12-03-00050-CV, 2003 WL 22682356 , at *6 (Tex. App.–Tyler Nov. 13, 2003, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). 2008See, e.g., In re Nance , 143 S.W.3d at 510 ; In re Highland Pines Nursing Home, Ltd. , No. 12-03-00050-CV, 2003 WL 22682356 , at *6 (Tex. App.-Tyler Nov. 13, 2003, orig. proceeding) (mem. op.). | 2 | 2 |
A. A. Spurlin, Surviving Parent of Douglas J. Spurlin, a Minor, Deceased v. General Motors Corporationgreen1 sentence2014See Spurlin v. General Motors Corp., 528 F.2d 612, 620 (5th Cir. 1976). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Brown v. De La Cruz
green
1 sentence2025While HSG, though not Texas, claims that Brown v. De La Cruz, 156 S.W.3d 560 (Tex. 2004) settled the question, that is simply not true. | 1 | 2025–2025 |
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.