Rohrmoos factors (Texas) · Go Syfert
← Texas issues

Rohrmoos factors in Texas

11 Texas opinions name it 3 courts 2015–2026 7 in the last five years

The cases below were cited by Texas courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.

Followed or applied (3)

CaseFollowedCited
Rohrmoos Venture, Eric Langford, Dan Basso, and Tobin Grove v. Utsw DVA Healthcare, Llpgreen
tex · 2019 · cited in 7 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2020–2024
2 sentences

2020The Rohrmoos presumption applies only if the party seeking fees provides sufficient evidence of the reasonable hours worked and the reasonable hourly rate of those who did the work. 578 S.W.3d at 498–99.

2020The Rohrmoos presumption applies only if the party seeking fees provides sufficient evidence of the reasonable hours worked and the reasonable hourly rate of those who did the work. 578 S.W.3d at 498–99.

67
Davidow v. Inwood North Professional Group—Phase Igreen
tex · 1988 · cited in 2 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2015–2019
2 sentences

2019The court of appeals withdrew its opinion, vacated its judgment, and published a new opinion with the following language: Rohrmoos's motion for reconsideration improperly now argues that we should ignore the answers to Questions One through Three [of the jury charge] because the right to terminate a commercial lease for failure to make repairs exists only with respect to a breach of the implied warranty of suitability that the Supreme Court established in Davidow v. Inwood North Professional Group-Phase I , 747 S.W.2d 373 , 376-77 (Tex. 1988) and does not exist for a prior material breach of a

2015Three, Rohrmoos’s motion for reconsideration improperly now argues that we should ignore the answers to Questions One through Three because the right to terminate a commercial lease for failure to make repairs exists only with respect to a breach of the implied warranty of suitability that the supreme court established in Davidow v. Inwood North Professional Group- Phase 1, 747 S.W.2d 373, 376-77 (Tex. 1988) and does not exist for a prior material breach of an express duty repair contained in the lease.

12
Virginia O. Kinsel, as Attorney-In-Fact for J. Frank Kinsel, J. Frank Kinsel, Jr., Carole K. Edwards, and Catherine K. Collins v. Jane O. Lindsey, Individually and as Co-Trustee of the Lesey B. Kinsel Trust, Robert N. Oliver, Keith Branyon and Jackson Walker, Llpgreen
tex · 2017 · cited in 1 Texas opinions naming this issue, 2024–2024
2 sentences

2024Salinas further argues that the City failed to segregate its attorney’s fees. “[A] claimant must segregate legal fees accrued for those claims for which attorney[’]s fees are recoverable from those that are not.” Kinsel v. Lindsey, 526 S.W.3d 411, 427 (Tex. 2017).

2024Salinas further argues that the City failed to segregate its attorney’s fees. “[A] claimant must segregate legal fees accrued for those claims for which attorney[’]s fees are recoverable from those that are not.” Kinsel v. Lindsey, 526 S.W.3d 411, 427 (Tex. 2017).

11

Distinguished, questioned or overruled (0)

CaseNegativeCited
No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Texas. Read the followed side critically anyway.

Also cited on this issue (1)

CaseCitedYears
Rahul K. Nath, M.D. v. Texas Children's Hospital and Baylor College of Medicine green
tex · 2019
2 sentences

2026Nath, 576 S.W.3d at 709–10; see also QJD Peking Duck Rest., Inc. v. TCP Spectrum Partners, Ltd., No. 01-22-00545-CV, 2023 WL 5436907 , at *4 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Aug. 24, 2023, no pet.) (mem. op.) (finding the trial court did not abuse its discretion by awarding trial 8 attorney’s fees when party requesting fees presented evidence meeting the Rohrmoos standard and the evidence was uncontroverted).

2026Nath, 576 S.W.3d at 709–10; see also QJD Peking Duck Rest., Inc. v. TCP Spectrum Partners, Ltd., No. 01-22-00545-CV, 2023 WL 5436907 , at *4 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] Aug. 24, 2023, no pet.) (mem. op.) (finding the trial court did not abuse its discretion by awarding trial 8 attorney’s fees when party requesting fees presented evidence meeting the Rohrmoos standard and the evidence was uncontroverted).

12026–2026

← Caselaw search · G Cite Topics · Brief Check