11 Washington opinions name it 2 courts 1938–2016 0 in the last five years
The cases below were cited by Washington courts in a sentence that names this issue. Sides come from how each citing opinion treated the case (Syfertize flag on that citation), so a case can appear on both: that is where the law is contested. A red or yellow chip is the case's own overall treatment.
| Case | Followed | Cited |
|---|---|---|
Gardner v. Loomis Armored, Inc.green2 sentences2011See Gardner, 128 Wash.2d at 943 , 913 P.2d 377 . 2011See Gardner, 128 Wash.2d at 943 , 913 P.2d 377 . | 2 | 4 |
Ellis v. City of Seattlegreen2 sentences2011We held that “the jeopardy prong of the Gardner test may be established if an employee has an objectively reasonable belief the law may be violated in the absence of his or her action.” Id. at 461. 2011We held that “the jeopardy prong of the Gardner test may be established if an employee has an objectively reasonable belief the law may be violated in the absence of his or her action.” Id. at 461. | 2 | 2 |
Gardner v. Loomis Armored Inc.green2 sentences2011See Gardner, 128 Wash.2d at 943 , 913 P.2d 377 . 2011See Gardner, 128 Wash.2d at 943 , 913 P.2d 377 . | 1 | 2 |
Roberts v. Dudleygreen1 sentence2001Id. at 69-70, 64-65 (retaining the four-element Gardner test). | 1 | 1 |
| Case | Negative | Cited |
|---|---|---|
| No negative-treatment citations attached to this issue in Washington. Read the followed side critically anyway. | ||
| Case | Cited | Years |
|---|---|---|
Ellis v. City of Seattle
green
2 sentences2011We held that "the jeopardy prong of the Gardner test may be established if an employee has an objectively reasonable belief the law may be violated in the absence of his or her action." Id. at 461, 13 P.3d 1065 . 2011We held that "the jeopardy prong of the Gardner test may be established if an employee has an objectively reasonable belief the law may be violated in the absence of his or her action." Id. at 461, 13 P.3d 1065 . | 2 | 2008–2011 |
Dicomes v. State
green
2 sentences2001Dicomes, 113 Wn.2d at 617 . 2001Dicomes, 113 Wn.2d at 617 . | 2 | 2001–2001 |
State v. Riley
red
1 sentence2016State v. Riley, 69 Wn. | 1 | 2016–2016 |
State v. Berlin
green
2 sentences2016Contrary to Gardner’s claim on appeal, a track record of providing reliable information by a citizen informant is not required to establish the informant’s credibility “because a citizen who is an eyewitness or a victim lacks the opportunity to establish a record of previous reliability.” State v. Berlin, 46 Wn. 2016App. 587, 590 , 731 P.2d 548 (1987). | 1 | 2016–2016 |
Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of Bellevue
green
1 sentence2013In addition, “[a] trial court may consider whether the new claim is futile or untimely.” Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of Bellevue, 132 Wn.2d 103, 142 , 937 P.2d 154 (1997).z ¶40 Here, the trial court denied Gardner’s motion for leave to amend after concluding that Gardner could not prove damages and that the motion was untimely because he filed it together with his summary judgment response. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of Bellevue
green
1 sentence2013In addition, “[a] trial court may consider whether the new claim is futile or untimely.” Ino Ino, Inc. v. City of Bellevue, 132 Wn.2d 103, 142 , 937 P.2d 154 (1997).z ¶40 Here, the trial court denied Gardner’s motion for leave to amend after concluding that Gardner could not prove damages and that the motion was untimely because he filed it together with his summary judgment response. | 1 | 2013–2013 |
Roberts v. Dudley
green
1 sentence2001Id. at 69-70, 64-65, 993 P.2d 901 (retaining the four-element Gardner test). | 1 | 2001–2001 |
Birkel v. Chandler
green
2 sentences1938In Birkel v. Chandler, 26 Wash. 241 , 66 Pac. 406 , plaintiff sought recovery against three separate defendants, the owner of the building where the accident happened, and two other persons who were performing the work which resulted in the accident. 1938In Birkel v. Chandler, 26 Wash. 241 , 66 Pac. 406 , plaintiff sought recovery against three separate defendants, the owner of the building where the accident happened, and two other persons who were performing the work which resulted in the accident. | 1 | 1938–1938 |
Counted by distinct opinions that both name this issue and are annotated to the section; sections every opinion cites regardless of issue are not filtered here, so read the counts against the total above.
Opinions by the citing court's state. A doctrine retained in one state and abandoned in another shows up here as a year span that stalls.